Literature DB >> 33414553

Conservation of copy number profiles during engraftment and passaging of patient-derived cancer xenografts.

Xing Yi Woo1, Jessica Giordano2,3, Anuj Srivastava1, Zi-Ming Zhao1, Michael W Lloyd4, Roebi de Bruijn5, Yun-Suhk Suh6, Rajesh Patidar7, Li Chen7, Sandra Scherer8, Matthew H Bailey8,9, Chieh-Hsiang Yang8, Emilio Cortes-Sanchez8, Yuanxin Xi10, Jing Wang10, Jayamanna Wickramasinghe11, Andrew V Kossenkov11, Vito W Rebecca11, Hua Sun12, R Jay Mashl12, Sherri R Davies12, Ryan Jeon13, Christian Frech13, Jelena Randjelovic13, Jacqueline Rosains13, Francesco Galimi2,3, Andrea Bertotti2,3, Adam Lafferty14, Alice C O'Farrell14, Elodie Modave15,16, Diether Lambrechts15,16, Petra Ter Brugge5, Violeta Serra17, Elisabetta Marangoni18, Rania El Botty18, Hyunsoo Kim1, Jong-Il Kim6, Han-Kwang Yang6, Charles Lee1,19,20, Dennis A Dean13, Brandi Davis-Dusenbery13, Yvonne A Evrard7, James H Doroshow21, Alana L Welm8, Bryan E Welm8,22, Michael T Lewis23, Bingliang Fang24, Jack A Roth24, Funda Meric-Bernstam25, Meenhard Herlyn11, Michael A Davies26, Li Ding12, Shunqiang Li12, Ramaswamy Govindan12, Claudio Isella2,3, Jeffrey A Moscow27, Livio Trusolino2,3, Annette T Byrne14, Jos Jonkers5, Carol J Bult4, Enzo Medico28,29, Jeffrey H Chuang30.   

Abstract

Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are resected human tumors engrafted into mice for preclinical studies and therapeutic testing. It has been proposed that the mouse host affects tumor evolution during PDX engraftment and propagation, affecting the accuracy of PDX modeling of human cancer. Here, we exhaustively analyze copy number alterations (CNAs) in 1,451 PDX and matched patient tumor (PT) samples from 509 PDX models. CNA inferences based on DNA sequencing and microarray data displayed substantially higher resolution and dynamic range than gene expression-based inferences, and they also showed strong CNA conservation from PTs through late-passage PDXs. CNA recurrence analysis of 130 colorectal and breast PT/PDX-early/PDX-late trios confirmed high-resolution CNA retention. We observed no significant enrichment of cancer-related genes in PDX-specific CNAs across models. Moreover, CNA differences between patient and PDX tumors were comparable to variations in multiregion samples within patients. Our study demonstrates the lack of systematic copy number evolution driven by the PDX mouse host.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33414553      PMCID: PMC7808565          DOI: 10.1038/s41588-020-00750-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  72 in total

1.  Anticancer drug development: the grand challenges.

Authors:  William N Hait
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Humanized mice in translational biomedical research.

Authors:  Leonard D Shultz; Fumihiko Ishikawa; Dale L Greiner
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 53.106

3.  Tumor grafts derived from women with breast cancer authentically reflect tumor pathology, growth, metastasis and disease outcomes.

Authors:  Yoko S DeRose; Guoying Wang; Yi-Chun Lin; Philip S Bernard; Saundra S Buys; Mark T W Ebbert; Rachel Factor; Cindy Matsen; Brett A Milash; Edward Nelson; Leigh Neumayer; R Lor Randall; Inge J Stijleman; Bryan E Welm; Alana L Welm
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-10-23       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 4.  Genetically engineered mouse models in cancer research.

Authors:  Jessica C Walrath; Jessica J Hawes; Terry Van Dyke; Karlyne M Reilly
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.242

5.  Humanized mouse models to study human diseases.

Authors:  Michael A Brehm; Leonard D Shultz; Dale L Greiner
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.243

6.  [Sensitization to the influenza virus in a combined experimental infection].

Authors:  S Gönczi
Journal:  Biull Eksp Biol Med       Date:  1987-05

Review 7.  Patient-derived xenograft models: an emerging platform for translational cancer research.

Authors:  Manuel Hidalgo; Frederic Amant; Andrew V Biankin; Eva Budinská; Annette T Byrne; Carlos Caldas; Robert B Clarke; Steven de Jong; Jos Jonkers; Gunhild Mari Mælandsmo; Sergio Roman-Roman; Joan Seoane; Livio Trusolino; Alberto Villanueva
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 39.397

8.  Humanized mouse model of ovarian cancer recapitulates patient solid tumor progression, ascites formation, and metastasis.

Authors:  Richard B Bankert; Sathy V Balu-Iyer; Kunle Odunsi; Leonard D Shultz; Raymond J Kelleher; Jennifer L Barnas; Michelle Simpson-Abelson; Robert Parsons; Sandra J Yokota
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Biobank of Breast Cancer Explants with Preserved Intra-tumor Heterogeneity to Screen Anticancer Compounds.

Authors:  Alejandra Bruna; Oscar M Rueda; Wendy Greenwood; Ankita Sati Batra; Maurizio Callari; Rajbir Nath Batra; Katherine Pogrebniak; Jose Sandoval; John W Cassidy; Ana Tufegdzic-Vidakovic; Stephen-John Sammut; Linda Jones; Elena Provenzano; Richard Baird; Peter Eirew; James Hadfield; Matthew Eldridge; Anne McLaren-Douglas; Andrew Barthorpe; Howard Lightfoot; Mark J O'Connor; Joe Gray; Javier Cortes; Jose Baselga; Elisabetta Marangoni; Alana L Welm; Samuel Aparicio; Violeta Serra; Mathew J Garnett; Carlos Caldas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 10.  Patient-derived breast tumor xenografts facilitating personalized cancer therapy.

Authors:  Melissa D Landis; Brian D Lehmann; Jennifer A Pietenpol; Jenny C Chang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  37 in total

1.  Expanding the concept of patient-derived xenografts cohorts in head and neck cancer: current and future perspectives.

Authors:  Zhi Yuan Zhang; Shu Yang Sun
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2021-12-01

2.  Clonal populations of a human TNBC model display significant functional heterogeneity and divergent growth dynamics in distinct contexts.

Authors:  Hendrik J Kuiken; Sabin Dhakal; Laura M Selfors; Chandler M Friend; Tian Zhang; Maurizio Callari; Ron C J Schackmann; G Kenneth Gray; Jett Crowdis; Hyo-Eun C Bhang; Timour Baslan; Frank Stegmeier; Steven P Gygi; Carlos Caldas; Joan S Brugge
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 3.  Towards precision oncology with patient-derived xenografts.

Authors:  Eugenia R Zanella; Elena Grassi; Livio Trusolino
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 65.011

Review 4.  Computational estimation of quality and clinical relevance of cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Lucia Trastulla; Javad Noorbakhsh; Francisca Vazquez; James McFarland; Francesco Iorio
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 13.068

5.  Progress and potential: The Cancer Moonshot.

Authors:  Norman E Sharpless; Dinah S Singer
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 6.  Melanoma models for the next generation of therapies.

Authors:  E Elizabeth Patton; Kristen L Mueller; David J Adams; Niroshana Anandasabapathy; Andrew E Aplin; Corine Bertolotto; Marcus Bosenberg; Craig J Ceol; Christin E Burd; Ping Chi; Meenhard Herlyn; Sheri L Holmen; Florian A Karreth; Charles K Kaufman; Shaheen Khan; Sebastian Kobold; Eleonora Leucci; Carmit Levy; David B Lombard; Amanda W Lund; Kerrie L Marie; Jean-Christophe Marine; Richard Marais; Martin McMahon; Carla Daniela Robles-Espinoza; Ze'ev A Ronai; Yardena Samuels; Maria S Soengas; Jessie Villanueva; Ashani T Weeraratna; Richard M White; Iwei Yeh; Jiyue Zhu; Leonard I Zon; Marc S Hurlbert; Glenn Merlino
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 7.  Functional precision oncology: Testing tumors with drugs to identify vulnerabilities and novel combinations.

Authors:  Anthony Letai; Patrick Bhola; Alana L Welm
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Patient-Derived Xenografts to Study Cancer Metabolism: When Does X Mark the Spot?

Authors:  Christopher S Nabel; Matthew G Vander Heiden
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Comprehensive characterization of 536 patient-derived xenograft models prioritizes candidatesfor targeted treatment.

Authors:  Hua Sun; Song Cao; R Jay Mashl; Chia-Kuei Mo; Simone Zaccaria; Michael C Wendl; Sherri R Davies; Matthew H Bailey; Tina M Primeau; Jeremy Hoog; Jacqueline L Mudd; Dennis A Dean; Rajesh Patidar; Li Chen; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Reyka G Jayasinghe; Fernanda Martins Rodrigues; Nadezhda V Terekhanova; Yize Li; Kian-Huat Lim; Andrea Wang-Gillam; Brian A Van Tine; Cynthia X Ma; Rebecca Aft; Katherine C Fuh; Julie K Schwarz; Jose P Zevallos; Sidharth V Puram; John F Dipersio; Brandi Davis-Dusenbery; Matthew J Ellis; Michael T Lewis; Michael A Davies; Meenhard Herlyn; Bingliang Fang; Jack A Roth; Alana L Welm; Bryan E Welm; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Feng Chen; Ryan C Fields; Shunqiang Li; Ramaswamy Govindan; James H Doroshow; Jeffrey A Moscow; Yvonne A Evrard; Jeffrey H Chuang; Benjamin J Raphael; Li Ding
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 10.  Mapping lung squamous cell carcinoma pathogenesis through in vitro and in vivo models.

Authors:  Sandra Gómez-López; Zoe E Whiteman; Sam M Janes
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.