Bruno Levy1,2,3,4, Caroline Fritz5,6,7, Caroline Piona5,6,7, Kevin Duarte8, Andrea Morelli8,9, Philippe Guerci10, Antoine Kimmoun5,6,7, Nicolas Girerd8. 1. Service de Médecine Intensive Et Réanimation Brabois, CHRU Nancy, Pôle Cardio-Médico-Chirurgical, 54511, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. blevy5463@gmail.com. 2. INSERM U1116, Faculté de Médecine, 54511, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. blevy5463@gmail.com. 3. Université de Lorraine, 54000, Nancy, France. blevy5463@gmail.com. 4. Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Nancy, Brabois, Rue du Morvan, 54500, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. blevy5463@gmail.com. 5. Service de Médecine Intensive Et Réanimation Brabois, CHRU Nancy, Pôle Cardio-Médico-Chirurgical, 54511, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. 6. INSERM U1116, Faculté de Médecine, 54511, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. 7. Université de Lorraine, 54000, Nancy, France. 8. INSERM CIC1433, Nancy University Hospital, 54000, Nancy, France. 9. Department of Internal Clinical, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Rome, La Sapienza, Rome, Italy. 10. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Nancy, 54511, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that heart rate control with selective beta-1 blockers in septic shock is safe. In these trials, esmolol was administered 24 h after onset of septic shock in patients who remained tachycardic. While an earlier use of beta-blockers might be beneficial, such use remains challenging due to the difficulty in distinguishing between compensatory and non-compensatory tachycardia. Therefore, the Esmosepsis study was designed to study the effects of esmolol aimed at reducing the heart rate by 20% after the initial resuscitation process in hyperkinetic septic shock patients on (1) cardiac index and (2) systemic and regional hemodynamics as well as inflammatory patterns. METHODS: Nine consecutive stabilized tachycardic hyperkinetic septic shock patients treated with norepinephrine for a minimum of 6 h were included. Esmolol was infused during 6 h in order to decrease the heart rate by 20%. The following data were recorded at hours H0 (before esmolol administration), H1-H6 (esmolol administration) and 1 h after esmolol cessation (H7): systolic arterial pressure, diastolic arterial pressure, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, heart rate, PICCO transpulmonary thermodilution, sublingual and musculo-cutaneous microcirculation, indocyanine green clearance and echocardiographic parameters, diuresis, lactate, and arterial and venous blood gases. RESULTS: Esmolol was infused 9 (6.4-11.6) hours after norepinephrine introduction. Esmolol was ceased early in 3 out of 9 patients due to a marked increase in norepinephrine requirement associated with a picture of persistent cardiac failure at the lowest esmolol dose. For the global group, during esmolol infusion, norepinephrine infusion increased from 0.49 (0.34-0.83) to 0.78 (0.3-1.11) µg/min/kg. The use of esmolol was associated with a significant decrease in heart rate from 115 (110-125) to 100 (92-103) beats/min and a decrease in cardiac index from 4.2 (3.1-4.4) to 2.9 (2.5-3.7) l/min/m-2. Indexed stroke volume remained unchanged. Cardiac function index and global ejection fraction also markedly decreased. Using echocardiography, systolic, diastolic as well as left and right ventricular function parameters worsened. After esmolol cessation, all parameters returned to baseline values. Lactate and microcirculatory parameters did not change while the majority of pro-inflammatory proteins decreased in all patients. CONCLUSION: In the very early phase of septic shock, heart rate reduction using fast esmolol titration is associated with an increased risk of hypotension and decreased cardiac index despite maintained adequate tissue perfusion (NCT02068287).
BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that heart rate control with selective beta-1 blockers in septic shock is safe. In these trials, esmolol was administered 24 h after onset of septic shock in patients who remained tachycardic. While an earlier use of beta-blockers might be beneficial, such use remains challenging due to the difficulty in distinguishing between compensatory and non-compensatory tachycardia. Therefore, the Esmosepsis study was designed to study the effects of esmolol aimed at reducing the heart rate by 20% after the initial resuscitation process in hyperkinetic septic shockpatients on (1) cardiac index and (2) systemic and regional hemodynamics as well as inflammatory patterns. METHODS: Nine consecutive stabilized tachycardic hyperkinetic septic shockpatients treated with norepinephrine for a minimum of 6 h were included. Esmolol was infused during 6 h in order to decrease the heart rate by 20%. The following data were recorded at hours H0 (before esmolol administration), H1-H6 (esmolol administration) and 1 h after esmolol cessation (H7): systolic arterial pressure, diastolic arterial pressure, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, heart rate, PICCO transpulmonary thermodilution, sublingual and musculo-cutaneous microcirculation, indocyanine green clearance and echocardiographic parameters, diuresis, lactate, and arterial and venous blood gases. RESULTS:Esmolol was infused 9 (6.4-11.6) hours after norepinephrine introduction. Esmolol was ceased early in 3 out of 9 patients due to a marked increase in norepinephrine requirement associated with a picture of persistent cardiac failure at the lowest esmolol dose. For the global group, during esmolol infusion, norepinephrine infusion increased from 0.49 (0.34-0.83) to 0.78 (0.3-1.11) µg/min/kg. The use of esmolol was associated with a significant decrease in heart rate from 115 (110-125) to 100 (92-103) beats/min and a decrease in cardiac index from 4.2 (3.1-4.4) to 2.9 (2.5-3.7) l/min/m-2. Indexed stroke volume remained unchanged. Cardiac function index and global ejection fraction also markedly decreased. Using echocardiography, systolic, diastolic as well as left and right ventricular function parameters worsened. After esmolol cessation, all parameters returned to baseline values. Lactate and microcirculatory parameters did not change while the majority of pro-inflammatory proteins decreased in all patients. CONCLUSION: In the very early phase of septic shock, heart rate reduction using fast esmolol titration is associated with an increased risk of hypotension and decreased cardiac index despite maintained adequate tissue perfusion (NCT02068287).
Authors: Andrea Morelli; Salvatore M Romano; Filippo Sanfilippo; Cristina Santonocito; Giacomo Frati; Marco Chiostri; Felice E Agrò; Christian Ertmer; Sebastian W Rehberg; Antoine Vieillard-Baron Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2020-07-18 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Daniel De Backer; Gustavo Ospina-Tascon; Diamantino Salgado; Raphaël Favory; Jacques Creteur; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-08-06 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Andrea Morelli; Abele Donati; Christian Ertmer; Sebastian Rehberg; Tim Kampmeier; Alessandra Orecchioni; Annalia D'Egidio; Valeria Cecchini; Giovanni Landoni; Paolo Pietropaoli; Martin Westphal; Mario Venditti; Alexandre Mebazaa; Mervyn Singer Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Roberta Domizi; Sara Calcinaro; Steve Harris; Christian Beilstein; Christiaan Boerma; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Annalia D'Egidio; Elisa Damiani; Abele Donati; Peter M Koetsier; Mary P Madden; Daniel F McAuley; Andrea Morelli; Paolo Pelaia; Patrick Royer; Manu Shankar-Hari; Nadine Wickboldt; Parjam Zolfaghari; Mervyn Singer Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2020-02-28 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Andrea Morelli; Christian Ertmer; Martin Westphal; Sebastian Rehberg; Tim Kampmeier; Sandra Ligges; Alessandra Orecchioni; Annalia D'Egidio; Fiorella D'Ippoliti; Cristina Raffone; Mario Venditti; Fabio Guarracino; Massimo Girardis; Luigi Tritapepe; Paolo Pietropaoli; Alexander Mebazaa; Mervyn Singer Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: R P Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes; Djillali Annane; Herwig Gerlach; Steven M Opal; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Ivor S Douglas; Roman Jaeschke; Tiffany M Osborn; Mark E Nunnally; Sean R Townsend; Konrad Reinhart; Ruth M Kleinpell; Derek C Angus; Clifford S Deutschman; Flavia R Machado; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Steven Webb; Richard J Beale; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rui Moreno Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jan Bakker; Eduardo Kattan; Djillali Annane; Ricardo Castro; Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Arnaldo Dubin; Laura Evans; Michelle Ng Gong; Olfa Hamzaoui; Can Ince; Bruno Levy; Xavier Monnet; Gustavo A Ospina Tascón; Marlies Ostermann; Michael R Pinsky; James A Russell; Bernd Saugel; Thomas W L Scheeren; Jean-Louis Teboul; Antoine Vieillard Baron; Jean-Louis Vincent; Fernando G Zampieri; Glenn Hernandez Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2021-12-15 Impact factor: 17.440