Literature DB >> 33413583

Hemodynamic and anti-inflammatory effects of early esmolol use in hyperkinetic septic shock: a pilot study.

Bruno Levy1,2,3,4, Caroline Fritz5,6,7, Caroline Piona5,6,7, Kevin Duarte8, Andrea Morelli8,9, Philippe Guerci10, Antoine Kimmoun5,6,7, Nicolas Girerd8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that heart rate control with selective beta-1 blockers in septic shock is safe. In these trials, esmolol was administered 24 h after onset of septic shock in patients who remained tachycardic. While an earlier use of beta-blockers might be beneficial, such use remains challenging due to the difficulty in distinguishing between compensatory and non-compensatory tachycardia. Therefore, the Esmosepsis study was designed to study the effects of esmolol aimed at reducing the heart rate by 20% after the initial resuscitation process in hyperkinetic septic shock patients on (1) cardiac index and (2) systemic and regional hemodynamics as well as inflammatory patterns.
METHODS: Nine consecutive stabilized tachycardic hyperkinetic septic shock patients treated with norepinephrine for a minimum of 6 h were included. Esmolol was infused during 6 h in order to decrease the heart rate by 20%. The following data were recorded at hours H0 (before esmolol administration), H1-H6 (esmolol administration) and 1 h after esmolol cessation (H7): systolic arterial pressure, diastolic arterial pressure, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, heart rate, PICCO transpulmonary thermodilution, sublingual and musculo-cutaneous microcirculation, indocyanine green clearance and echocardiographic parameters, diuresis, lactate, and arterial and venous blood gases.
RESULTS: Esmolol was infused 9 (6.4-11.6) hours after norepinephrine introduction. Esmolol was ceased early in 3 out of 9 patients due to a marked increase in norepinephrine requirement associated with a picture of persistent cardiac failure at the lowest esmolol dose. For the global group, during esmolol infusion, norepinephrine infusion increased from 0.49 (0.34-0.83) to 0.78 (0.3-1.11) µg/min/kg. The use of esmolol was associated with a significant decrease in heart rate from 115 (110-125) to 100 (92-103) beats/min and a decrease in cardiac index from 4.2 (3.1-4.4) to 2.9 (2.5-3.7) l/min/m-2. Indexed stroke volume remained unchanged. Cardiac function index and global ejection fraction also markedly decreased. Using echocardiography, systolic, diastolic as well as left and right ventricular function parameters worsened. After esmolol cessation, all parameters returned to baseline values. Lactate and microcirculatory parameters did not change while the majority of pro-inflammatory proteins decreased in all patients.
CONCLUSION: In the very early phase of septic shock, heart rate reduction using fast esmolol titration is associated with an increased risk of hypotension and decreased cardiac index despite maintained adequate tissue perfusion (NCT02068287).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beta-blockers; Inflammation; Norepinephrine; Septic shock

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33413583      PMCID: PMC7791811          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03445-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


  16 in total

Review 1.  Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Paul Marik; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Beta-blocker use in severe sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review.

Authors:  Filippo Sanfilippo; Cristina Santonocito; Andrea Morelli; Pierre Foex
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.580

3.  Beta-blockers in septic shock to optimize hemodynamics? We are not sure.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Djillali Annane
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Systolic-dicrotic notch pressure difference can identify tachycardic patients with septic shock at risk of cardiovascular decompensation following pharmacological heart rate reduction.

Authors:  Andrea Morelli; Salvatore M Romano; Filippo Sanfilippo; Cristina Santonocito; Giacomo Frati; Marco Chiostri; Felice E Agrò; Christian Ertmer; Sebastian W Rehberg; Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 5.  Monitoring the microcirculation in the critically ill patient: current methods and future approaches.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Gustavo Ospina-Tascon; Diamantino Salgado; Raphaël Favory; Jacques Creteur; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Inotropes and vasopressors use in cardiogenic shock: when, which and how much?

Authors:  Bruno Levy; Julie Buzon; Antoine Kimmoun
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.687

7.  Microvascular effects of heart rate control with esmolol in patients with septic shock: a pilot study.

Authors:  Andrea Morelli; Abele Donati; Christian Ertmer; Sebastian Rehberg; Tim Kampmeier; Alessandra Orecchioni; Annalia D'Egidio; Valeria Cecchini; Giovanni Landoni; Paolo Pietropaoli; Martin Westphal; Mario Venditti; Alexandre Mebazaa; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Relationship between norepinephrine dose, tachycardia and outcome in septic shock: A multicentre evaluation.

Authors:  Roberta Domizi; Sara Calcinaro; Steve Harris; Christian Beilstein; Christiaan Boerma; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Annalia D'Egidio; Elisa Damiani; Abele Donati; Peter M Koetsier; Mary P Madden; Daniel F McAuley; Andrea Morelli; Paolo Pelaia; Patrick Royer; Manu Shankar-Hari; Nadine Wickboldt; Parjam Zolfaghari; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.425

9.  Effect of heart rate control with esmolol on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Andrea Morelli; Christian Ertmer; Martin Westphal; Sebastian Rehberg; Tim Kampmeier; Sandra Ligges; Alessandra Orecchioni; Annalia D'Egidio; Fiorella D'Ippoliti; Cristina Raffone; Mario Venditti; Fabio Guarracino; Massimo Girardis; Luigi Tritapepe; Paolo Pietropaoli; Alexander Mebazaa; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.

Authors:  R P Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes; Djillali Annane; Herwig Gerlach; Steven M Opal; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Ivor S Douglas; Roman Jaeschke; Tiffany M Osborn; Mark E Nunnally; Sean R Townsend; Konrad Reinhart; Ruth M Kleinpell; Derek C Angus; Clifford S Deutschman; Flavia R Machado; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Steven Webb; Richard J Beale; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rui Moreno
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 17.440

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Current practice and evolving concepts in septic shock resuscitation.

Authors:  Jan Bakker; Eduardo Kattan; Djillali Annane; Ricardo Castro; Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Arnaldo Dubin; Laura Evans; Michelle Ng Gong; Olfa Hamzaoui; Can Ince; Bruno Levy; Xavier Monnet; Gustavo A Ospina Tascón; Marlies Ostermann; Michael R Pinsky; James A Russell; Bernd Saugel; Thomas W L Scheeren; Jean-Louis Teboul; Antoine Vieillard Baron; Jean-Louis Vincent; Fernando G Zampieri; Glenn Hernandez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  The autonomic nervous system in septic shock and its role as a future therapeutic target: a narrative review.

Authors:  Marta Carrara; Manuela Ferrario; Bernardo Bollen Pinto; Antoine Herpain
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.925

3.  β1-blocker in sepsis.

Authors:  Daisuke Hasegawa; Ryota Sato; Osamu Nishida
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2021-05-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.