Literature DB >> 23873274

Microvascular effects of heart rate control with esmolol in patients with septic shock: a pilot study.

Andrea Morelli1, Abele Donati, Christian Ertmer, Sebastian Rehberg, Tim Kampmeier, Alessandra Orecchioni, Annalia D'Egidio, Valeria Cecchini, Giovanni Landoni, Paolo Pietropaoli, Martin Westphal, Mario Venditti, Alexandre Mebazaa, Mervyn Singer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: β-blocker therapy may control heart rate and attenuate the deleterious effects of β-stimulating catecholamines in septic shock. However, their negative chronotropy and inotropy may potentially lead to an inappropriately low cardiac output, with a subsequent compromise of microvascular blood flow. The purpose of the present pilot study was to investigate the effects of reducing heart rate to less than 95 beats per minute in patients with septic shock using the β-1 adrenoceptor blocker, esmolol, with specific focus on systemic hemodynamics and the microcirculation.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational clinical study.
SETTING: Multidisciplinary ICU at a university hospital.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After 24 hours of initial hemodynamic optimization, 25 septic shock patients with a heart rate greater than or equal to 95 beats per minute and requiring norepinephrine to maintain mean arterial pressure greater than or equal to 65 mm Hg received a titrated esmolol infusion to maintain heart rate less than 95 beats per minute. Sublingual microcirculatory blood flow was assessed by sidestream dark-field imaging. All measurements, including data from right heart catheterization and norepinephrine requirements, were obtained at baseline and 24 hours after esmolol administration. Heart rates targeted between 80 and 94 beats per minute were achieved in all patients. Whereas cardiac index decreased (4.0 [3.5; 5.3] vs 3.1 [2.6; 3.9] L/min/m; p<0.001), stroke volume remained unchanged (34 [37; 47] vs 40 [31; 46] mL/beat/m; p=0.32). Microcirculatory blood flow in small vessels increased (2.8 [2.6; 3.0] vs 3.0 [3.0; 3.0]; p=0.002), while the heterogeneity index decreased (median 0.06 [interquartile range 0; 0.21] vs 0 [0; 0]; p=0.002). PaO2 and pH increased while PaCO2 decreased (all p<0.05). Of note, norepinephrine requirements were significantly reduced by selective β-1 blocker therapy (0.53 [0.29; 0.96] vs 0.41 [0.22; 0.79] µg/kg/min; p=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated that heart rate control by a titrated esmolol infusion in septic shock patients was associated with maintenance of stroke volume, preserved microvascular blood flow, and a reduction in norepinephrine requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23873274     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a678d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  35 in total

1.  Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Treatments for Atrial Fibrillation During Sepsis: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Allan J Walkey; Stephen R Evans; Michael R Winter; Emelia J Benjamin
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Effect of heart rate on hospital mortality in critically ill patients may be modified by age: a retrospective observational study from large database.

Authors:  Dawei Zhou; Zhimin Li; Guangzhi Shi; Jianxin Zhou
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Outpatient beta-blockers and survival from sepsis: Results from a national cohort of Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Kathleen E Singer; Courtney E Collins; Julie M Flahive; Allison S Wyman; M Didem Ayturk; Heena P Santry
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  β2-agonists and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  G R Scott Budinger; Gökhan M Mutlu
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Beta-blockers in septic shock to optimize hemodynamics? Yes.

Authors:  Daniel A Reuter; James A Russell; Armand Mekontso Dessap
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Catecholamines for inflammatory shock: a Jekyll-and-Hyde conundrum.

Authors:  Davide Tommaso Andreis; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Vasoactive agents for the treatment of sepsis.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Kun Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-09

Review 8.  Endothelial Activation and Microcirculatory Disorders in Sepsis.

Authors:  Lisa Raia; Lara Zafrani
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-03

Review 9.  Neural pathways involved in infection-induced inflammation: recent insights and clinical implications.

Authors:  Marion Griton; Jan Pieter Konsman
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.435

10.  Clinical Effect of Shenfu Injection in Patients with Septic Shock: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zijun Mou; Zhengtao Lv; Yi Li; Meng Wang; Qun Xu; Xuezhong Yu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.