BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have been shown to be effective in migraine prevention. Eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumb have shown efficacy in clinical trials along with favorable safety and tolerability profiles. Although erenumab is a human mAb and the others have been humanized to varying degrees, they all have the capacity to provoke immune reactions. The present review article aims to discuss the current relationship between mAbs targeting the CGRP pathway (CGRP mAbs) and immunogenicity and their potential clinical implications. FINDINGS: The incidence of patients developing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), their titer, and clinical significance are highly variable and depend on a variety of different drug and patient factors. Neutralizing ADAs (NAbs) bind to and inhibit or reduce the pharmacologic activity of the biologic drug molecule, whereas non-neutralizing antibodies (Non-NAbs) bind to the biologic drug molecule without affecting pharmacologic activity in an in vitro test, although pharmacokinetics and drug clearance may be affected. A direct comparison of immunogenicity data across clinical trials with different biologics is not possible due to a lack of standardized assays. Several phase 2, phase 3, and long-term studies evaluating CGRP mAbs for migraine prevention have reported immunogenicity data (5 studies each for eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab). Across these studies, prevalence of ADAs varied, ranging from < 1% to ~ 18%. Neutralizing ADAs were slightly less common, with a prevalence ranging from 0 to 12%. Adverse events related to ADA formation were rare. CONCLUSIONS: As more CGRP mAb studies are conducted and more long-term follow-up data become available, evidence is increasing that immunogenicity rates of biologic therapies for migraine are low, and adverse events related to ADAs are rare. Taken together, these results add to the growing body of evidence for the safety and tolerability of this class of migraine medications.
BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have been shown to be effective in migraine prevention. Eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumb have shown efficacy in clinical trials along with favorable safety and tolerability profiles. Although erenumab is a human mAb and the others have been humanized to varying degrees, they all have the capacity to provoke immune reactions. The present review article aims to discuss the current relationship between mAbs targeting the CGRP pathway (CGRP mAbs) and immunogenicity and their potential clinical implications. FINDINGS: The incidence of patients developing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), their titer, and clinical significance are highly variable and depend on a variety of different drug and patient factors. Neutralizing ADAs (NAbs) bind to and inhibit or reduce the pharmacologic activity of the biologic drug molecule, whereas non-neutralizing antibodies (Non-NAbs) bind to the biologic drug molecule without affecting pharmacologic activity in an in vitro test, although pharmacokinetics and drug clearance may be affected. A direct comparison of immunogenicity data across clinical trials with different biologics is not possible due to a lack of standardized assays. Several phase 2, phase 3, and long-term studies evaluating CGRP mAbs for migraine prevention have reported immunogenicity data (5 studies each for eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab). Across these studies, prevalence of ADAs varied, ranging from < 1% to ~ 18%. Neutralizing ADAs were slightly less common, with a prevalence ranging from 0 to 12%. Adverse events related to ADA formation were rare. CONCLUSIONS: As more CGRP mAb studies are conducted and more long-term follow-up data become available, evidence is increasing that immunogenicity rates of biologic therapies for migraine are low, and adverse events related to ADAs are rare. Taken together, these results add to the growing body of evidence for the safety and tolerability of this class of migraine medications.
Authors: Ivo Van Walle; Yannick Gansemans; Paul W H I Parren; Philippe Stas; Ignace Lasters Journal: Expert Opin Biol Ther Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.388
Authors: David W Dodick; Peter J Goadsby; Egilius L H Spierings; Joel C Scherer; Steven P Sweeney; David S Grayzel Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2014-08-10 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Peter J Goadsby; Uwe Reuter; Yngve Hallström; Gregor Broessner; Jo H Bonner; Feng Zhang; Sandhya Sapra; Hernan Picard; Daniel D Mikol; Robert A Lenz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-11-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: G Shankar; S Arkin; L Cocea; V Devanarayan; S Kirshner; A Kromminga; V Quarmby; S Richards; C K Schneider; M Subramanyam; S Swanson; D Verthelyi; S Yim Journal: AAPS J Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Stewart J Tepper; Messoud Ashina; Uwe Reuter; Jan Lewis Brandes; David Doležil; Stephen D Silberstein; Paul Winner; Feng Zhang; Sunfa Cheng; Daniel D Mikol Journal: Cephalalgia Date: 2020-03-26 Impact factor: 6.292
Authors: Stewart Tepper; Messoud Ashina; Uwe Reuter; Jan L Brandes; David Doležil; Stephen Silberstein; Paul Winner; Dean Leonardi; Daniel Mikol; Robert Lenz Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: David W Dodick; Messoud Ashina; Jan Lewis Brandes; David Kudrow; Michel Lanteri-Minet; Vera Osipova; Kerry Palmer; Hernan Picard; Daniel D Mikol; Robert A Lenz Journal: Cephalalgia Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 6.292
Authors: Michael W Leach; James B Rottman; M Benjamin Hock; Deborah Finco; Jennifer L Rojko; Joseph C Beyer Journal: Toxicol Pathol Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 1.902
Authors: Susan Pederson; David M Biondi; Brent Allan; Roger Cady; Barbara Schaeffler; Brian Baker; John Latham Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-10-25 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Jaime Fernández-Bravo-Rodrigo; Carlos Pascual-Morena; Amparo Flor-García; Alicia Saz-Lara; Irene Sequí-Dominguez; Celia Álvarez-Bueno; Dolores Barreda-Hernández; Iván Cavero-Redondo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: George R Nissan; Richard Kim; Joshua M Cohen; Michael J Seminerio; Lynda J Krasenbaum; Karen Carr; Vincent Martin Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Marty Coyne; Amy Rinaldi; Katherine Brigham; James Hawthorne; Dimos Katsaros; Morgan Perich; Nicholas Carrara; Flore Pericaud; Chris Franzese; Graham Jones Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2022-09-19 Impact factor: 2.314
Authors: Luigi Francesco Iannone; Pierangelo Geppetti; Alberto Chiarugi; Francesco De Cesaris Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2021-06-12 Impact factor: 3.397