Literature DB >> 28460892

Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial.

Stewart Tepper1, Messoud Ashina2, Uwe Reuter3, Jan L Brandes4, David Doležil5, Stephen Silberstein6, Paul Winner7, Dean Leonardi8, Daniel Mikol9, Robert Lenz9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway is important in migraine pathophysiology. We assessed the efficacy and safety of erenumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against the CGRP receptor, in patients with chronic migraine.
METHODS: This was a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study of erenumab for adults aged 18-65 years with chronic migraine, enrolled from 69 headache and clinical research centres in North America and Europe. Chronic migraine was defined as 15 or more headache days per month, of which eight or more were migraine days. Patients were randomly assigned (3:2:2) to subcutaneous placebo, erenumab 70 mg, or erenumab 140 mg, given every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. Randomisation was centrally executed using an interactive voice or web response system. Patients, study investigators, and study sponsor personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the change in monthly migraine days from baseline to the last 4 weeks of double-blind treatment (weeks 9-12). Safety endpoints were adverse events, clinical laboratory values, vital signs, and anti-erenumab antibodies. The efficacy analysis set included patients who received at least one dose of investigational product and completed at least one post-baseline monthly measurement. The safety analysis set included patients who received at least one dose of investigational product. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02066415.
FINDINGS: From April 3, 2014, to Dec 4, 2015, 667 patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=286), erenumab 70 mg (n=191), or erenumab 140 mg (n=190). Erenumab 70 mg and 140 mg reduced monthly migraine days versus placebo (both doses -6·6 days vs placebo -4·2 days; difference -2·5, 95% CI -3·5 to -1·4, p<0·0001). Adverse events were reported in 110 (39%) of 282 patients, 83 (44%) of 190 patients, and 88 (47%) of 188 patients in the placebo, 70 mg, and 140 mg groups, respectively. The most frequent adverse events were injection-site pain, upper respiratory tract infection, and nausea. Serious adverse events were reported by seven (2%), six (3%), and two (1%) patients, respectively; none were reported in more than one patient in any group or led to discontinuation. 11 patients in the 70 mg group and three in the 140 mg group had anti-erenumab binding antibodies; none had anti-erenumab neutralising antibodies. No clinically significant abnormalities in vital signs, laboratory results, or electrocardiogram findings were identified. Of 667 patients randomly assigned to treatment, 637 completed treatment. Four withdrew because of adverse events, two each in the placebo and 140 mg groups.
INTERPRETATION: In patients with chronic migraine, erenumab 70 mg and 140 mg reduced the number of monthly migraine days with a safety profile similar to placebo, providing evidence that erenumab could be a potential therapy for migraine prevention. Further research is needed to understand long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab, and the applicability of this study to real-world settings. FUNDING: Amgen.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28460892     DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30083-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  150 in total

1.  Erenumab for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine complicated with medication overuse headache: an observational, retrospective, 12-month real-life study.

Authors:  Maria Michela Cainazzo; Carlo Baraldi; Anna Ferrari; Flavia Lo Castro; Luca Pani; Simona Guerzoni
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 2.  CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies for the Preventative Treatment of Migraine.

Authors:  Heike Israel; Lars Neeb; Uwe Reuter
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2018-04-06

3.  Recent Advances in Pharmacotherapy for Episodic Migraine.

Authors:  Calvin Chan; Peter J Goadsby
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Treating chronic migraine in CADASIL with calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonism.

Authors:  Eric D Goldstein; Mohammed K Badi; James F Meschia
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2019-06

5.  Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP): role in migraine pathophysiology and therapeutic targeting.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Wattiez; Levi P Sowers; Andrew F Russo
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 6.902

6.  CSD-Induced Arterial Dilatation and Plasma Protein Extravasation Are Unaffected by Fremanezumab: Implications for CGRP's Role in Migraine with Aura.

Authors:  Aaron J Schain; Agustin Melo-Carrillo; Jennifer Stratton; Andrew M Strassman; Rami Burstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Recent Advances in Pharmacotherapy for Migraine Prevention: From Pathophysiology to New Drugs.

Authors:  Jonathan Jia Yuan Ong; Diana Yi-Ting Wei; Peter J Goadsby
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Emerging Therapies for Patients With Difficult-to-Treat Migraine.

Authors:  Troy Kish
Journal:  P T       Date:  2018-10

Review 9.  A new era in headache treatment.

Authors:  Michail Vikelis; Konstantinos C Spingos; Alan M Rapoport
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 10.  Treatment of the Patient with Refractory Headache.

Authors:  Alessandro S Zagami
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2018-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.