Literature DB >> 29171821

A Controlled Trial of Erenumab for Episodic Migraine.

Peter J Goadsby1, Uwe Reuter1, Yngve Hallström1, Gregor Broessner1, Jo H Bonner1, Feng Zhang1, Sandhya Sapra1, Hernan Picard1, Daniel D Mikol1, Robert A Lenz1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We tested erenumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, for the prevention of episodic migraine.
METHODS: We randomly assigned patients to receive a subcutaneous injection of either erenumab, at a dose of 70 mg or 140 mg, or placebo monthly for 6 months. The primary end point was the change from baseline to months 4 through 6 in the mean number of migraine days per month. Secondary end points were a 50% or greater reduction in mean migraine days per month, change in the number of days of use of acute migraine-specific medication, and change in scores on the physical-impairment and everyday-activities domains of the Migraine Physical Function Impact Diary (scale transformed to 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater migraine burden on functioning).
RESULTS: A total of 955 patients underwent randomization: 317 were assigned to the 70-mg erenumab group, 319 to the 140-mg erenumab group, and 319 to the placebo group. The mean number of migraine days per month at baseline was 8.3 in the overall population; by months 4 through 6, the number of days was reduced by 3.2 in the 70-mg erenumab group and by 3.7 in the 140-mg erenumab group, as compared with 1.8 days in the placebo group (P<0.001 for each dose vs. placebo). A 50% or greater reduction in the mean number of migraine days per month was achieved for 43.3% of patients in the 70-mg erenumab group and 50.0% of patients in the 140-mg erenumab group, as compared with 26.6% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for each dose vs. placebo), and the number of days of use of acute migraine-specific medication was reduced by 1.1 days in the 70-mg erenumab group and by 1.6 days in the 140-mg erenumab group, as compared with 0.2 days in the placebo group (P<0.001 for each dose vs. placebo). Physical-impairment scores improved by 4.2 and 4.8 points in the 70-mg and 140-mg erenumab groups, respectively, as compared with 2.4 points in the placebo group (P<0.001 for each dose vs. placebo), and everyday-activities scores improved by 5.5 and 5.9 points in the 70-mg and 140-mg erenumab groups, respectively, as compared with 3.3 points in the placebo group (P<0.001 for each dose vs. placebo). The rates of adverse events were similar between erenumab and placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: Erenumab administered subcutaneously at a monthly dose of 70 mg or 140 mg significantly reduced migraine frequency, the effects of migraines on daily activities, and the use of acute migraine-specific medication over a period of 6 months. The long-term safety and durability of the effect of erenumab require further study. (Funded by Amgen and Novartis; STRIVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02456740 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29171821     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  189 in total

Review 1.  G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Asthma Therapy: Pharmacology and Drug Action.

Authors:  Stacy Gelhaus Wendell; Hao Fan; Cheng Zhang
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 2.  CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies for the Preventative Treatment of Migraine.

Authors:  Heike Israel; Lars Neeb; Uwe Reuter
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2018-04-06

Review 3.  Menstrual migraine: what it is and does it matter?

Authors:  Letizia Maria Cupini; Ilenia Corbelli; Paola Sarchelli
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Recent Advances in Pharmacotherapy for Episodic Migraine.

Authors:  Calvin Chan; Peter J Goadsby
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP): role in migraine pathophysiology and therapeutic targeting.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Wattiez; Levi P Sowers; Andrew F Russo
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 6.902

Review 6.  From LBR-101 to Fremanezumab for Migraine.

Authors:  Marcelo E Bigal; Alan M Rapoport; Stephen D Silberstein; Sarah Walter; Richard J Hargreaves; Ernesto Aycardi
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.749

7.  RAMP3 determines rapid recycling of atypical chemokine receptor-3 for guided angiogenesis.

Authors:  Duncan I Mackie; Natalie R Nielsen; Matthew Harris; Smriti Singh; Reema B Davis; Danica Dy; Graham Ladds; Kathleen M Caron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Recent Advances in Pharmacotherapy for Migraine Prevention: From Pathophysiology to New Drugs.

Authors:  Jonathan Jia Yuan Ong; Diana Yi-Ting Wei; Peter J Goadsby
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Emerging Therapies for Patients With Difficult-to-Treat Migraine.

Authors:  Troy Kish
Journal:  P T       Date:  2018-10

Review 10.  A new era in headache treatment.

Authors:  Michail Vikelis; Konstantinos C Spingos; Alan M Rapoport
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.