Literature DB >> 33411819

Motor control characteristics of upper limbs in response to assistive forces during bilateral tasks.

Yuanyuan Wang1, Ping Yeap Loh2, Satoshi Muraki2.   

Abstract

Most research on power assist suits (PASs) that concerned PAS-human interactions has used human physical reactions as criteria to evaluate the mechanical function, however, with minimal emphasis on human reactions in response to PASs. In this study, we focused on the physiological responses of the upper limbs including muscle activity of the biceps brachii and the triceps brachii, co-activation, force steadiness (CV) and rated perceived exertion (RPE) to various patterns of bilateral assistive force, such as unilateral assistance (L0% & R67% [% = percentage of workload force, L = left arm, R = right arm], L67% & R0%, L0% & R33%, L33% & R0%), symmetrical (L0% & R0%, L33% & R33%, L67% & R67%) and asymmetrical bilateral assistance (L33% & R67%, L67% & R33%), during bilateral isometric force-matching tasks. The results showed a similar muscular response of the two arms to bilateral assistive conditions, and the muscle activity of the arm that was being observed decreased only when the assistive force that applied on itself increased, indicating that both arms may have adopted similar but independent motor control mechanisms to acclimate to the bilateral assistive forces. Comparison between the two unilateral assistances (L0% & R33% and L33% & R0%) and the two asymmetrical bilateral assistances (L33% & R67%, L67% & R33%) showed no significant differences in muscular responses, CV and RPE, indicating that bilateral assistances with bilateral interchanged assistive levels may be equally effective regardless of which arm the higher assistive force is applied to. Comparison between unilateral and symmetrical assistive conditions that have similar overall workloads (L67% & R0%, L33% & R33%, L0% & R67%) showed a lower CV and RPE score at symmetrical assistance compared with unilateral assistance, suggesting that assisting both arms with the same level simultaneously improves task performances compared with applying the assistive force to only one arm.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33411819      PMCID: PMC7790287          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  33 in total

1.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; D Kalakanis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Improved intralimb coordination in people with incomplete spinal cord injury following training with body weight support and electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Edelle Carmen Field-Fote; Dejan Tepavac
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2002-07

3.  Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching.

Authors:  Kathleen Y Haaland; Jillian L Prestopnik; Robert T Knight; Roland R Lee
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Asymmetric interference associated with force amplitude and hand dominance in bimanual constant isometric force.

Authors:  Xiaogang Hu; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.422

5.  Associations among strength, steadiness, and hand function across the adult life span.

Authors:  Adam R Marmon; Michael A Pascoe; Robert S Schwartz; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Dependence of asymmetrical interference on task demands and hand dominance in bimanual isometric force tasks.

Authors:  Xiaogang Hu; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Asymmetric control mechanisms of bimanual coordination: an application of directed connectivity analysis to kinematic and functional MRI data.

Authors:  Yohko Maki; Kin Foon Kevin Wong; Motoaki Sugiura; Tohru Ozaki; Norihiro Sadato
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Toward a movement dynamics perspective on dual-task performance.

Authors:  S P Swinnen; C B Walter
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 2.888

9.  Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion.

Authors:  G Borg
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.024

10.  Dynamic stability after ACL injury: who can hop?

Authors:  K S Rudolph; M J Axe; L Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.