Literature DB >> 21132279

Dependence of asymmetrical interference on task demands and hand dominance in bimanual isometric force tasks.

Xiaogang Hu1, Karl M Newell.   

Abstract

This study investigated the asymmetry of bilateral interference in a bimanual isometric force pulse task and the relation of the degree of interference with the asymmetry of the force levels and the hand dominance. One hand produced force pulses with the same peak force target, while the other hand produced different peak forces in blocked conditions with force target ratios between the hands that ranged from 1:1 to 16:1. There was asymmetric interference between the hands in that the hand performing the same peak forces showed stronger (i.e., higher bias and variable error) interference with the hand performing the different peak force than vice versa. The force-time properties also correlated more strongly when the different peak forces were generated by the left non-dominant than the right dominant hand. With increasing peak force ratios, the extent of interference became stronger and plateaued around the force ratio of 8:1 indicating a boundary condition to the asymmetric interference between hands. The results extend to bimanual isometric force control the dependence of bilateral asymmetric interference on task demands and hand dominance and provide further evidence on the degree of bilateral interference with task asymmetry.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21132279     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2502-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Dissociating the structural and metrical specifications of bimanual movement.

Authors:  S P Swinnen; M B Beirinckx; P F Meugens; C B Walter
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Changes in segmental and motor cortical output with contralateral muscle contractions and altered sensory inputs in humans.

Authors:  Tibor Hortobágyi; Janet L Taylor; Nicolas T Petersen; Gabrielle Russell; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Patterns of human interlimb coordination emerge from the properties of non-linear, limit cycle oscillatory processes: theory and data.

Authors:  J A Kelso; K G Holt; P Rubin; P N Kugler
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  The origin of activity in the biceps brachii muscle during voluntary contractions of the contralateral elbow flexor muscles.

Authors:  Inge Zijdewind; Jane E Butler; Simon C Gandevia; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  When two hands are better than one: reduced timing variability during bimanual movements.

Authors:  L L Helmuth; R B Ivry
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Structural constraints on bimanual movements.

Authors:  H Heuer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1993

9.  The effects of attention and handedness on coordination dynamics in a bimanual Fitts' law task.

Authors:  Eric L Amazeen; Shannon D Ringenbach; Polemnia G Amazeen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The control of rapid limb movement in the cat. II. Scaling of isometric force adjustments.

Authors:  C Ghez; D Vicario
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1978-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  6 in total

1.  The effect of motor overflow on bimanual asymmetric force coordination.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Sarah M Roelle; Didier Allexandre; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Jayme S Knutson; Guang H Yue; Andre G Machado; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The effects of task demands on bimanual skill acquisition.

Authors:  Erik H Hoyer; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of Computer-Aided Interlimb Force Coupling Training on Paretic Hand and Arm Motor Control following Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Chueh-Ho Lin; Li-Wei Chou; Hong-Ji Luo; Po-Yi Tsai; Fu-Kong Lieu; Shang-Lin Chiang; Wen-Hsu Sung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Interaction between position sense and force control in bimanual tasks.

Authors:  Giulia Ballardini; Valentina Ponassi; Elisa Galofaro; Giorgio Carlini; Francesca Marini; Laura Pellegrino; Pietro Morasso; Maura Casadio
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Motor control characteristics of upper limbs in response to assistive forces during bilateral tasks.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Ping Yeap Loh; Satoshi Muraki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Motor Adaptations to Pain during a Bilateral Plantarflexion Task: Does the Cost of Using the Non-Painful Limb Matter?

Authors:  François Hug; Paul W Hodges; Timothy J Carroll; Enrico De Martino; Justine Magnard; Kylie Tucker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.