Literature DB >> 33410568

Performance of deep learning synthetic CTs for MR-only brain radiation therapy.

Xiaoning Liu1, Hajar Emami2, Siamak P Nejad-Davarani3, Eric Morris4, Lonni Schultz5, Ming Dong2, Carri K Glide-Hurst6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the dosimetric and image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) performance of a novel generative adversarial network (GAN) generated synthetic CT (synCT) in the brain and compare its performance for clinical use including conventional brain radiotherapy, cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), planar, and volumetric IGRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: SynCT images for 12 brain cancer patients (6 SRS, 6 conventional) were generated from T1-weighted postgadolinium magnetic resonance (MR) images by applying a GAN model with a residual network (ResNet) generator and a convolutional neural network (CNN) with 5 convolutional layers as the discriminator that classified input images as real or synthetic. Following rigid registration, clinical structures and treatment plans derived from simulation CT (simCT) images were transferred to synCTs. Dose was recalculated for 15 simCT/synCT plan pairs using fixed monitor units. Two-dimensional (2D) gamma analysis (2%/2 mm, 1%/1 mm) was performed to compare dose distributions at isocenter. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics (D95% , D99% , D0.2cc, and D0.035cc ) were assessed for the targets and organ at risks (OARs). IGRT performance was evaluated via volumetric registration between cone beam CT (CBCT) to synCT/simCT and planar registration between KV images to synCT/simCT digital reconstructed radiographs (DRRs).
RESULTS: Average gamma passing rates at 1%/1mm and 2%/2mm were 99.0 ± 1.5% and 99.9 ± 0.2%, respectively. Excellent agreement in DVH metrics was observed (mean difference ≤0.10 ± 0.04 Gy for targets, 0.13 ± 0.04 Gy for OARs). The population averaged mean difference in CBCT-synCT registrations were <0.2 mm and 0.1 degree different from simCT-based registrations. The mean difference between kV-synCT DRR and kV-simCT DRR registrations was <0.5 mm with no statistically significant differences observed (P > 0.05). An outlier with a large resection cavity exhibited the worst-case scenario.
CONCLUSION: Brain GAN synCTs demonstrated excellent performance for dosimetric and IGRT endpoints, offering potential use in high precision brain cancer therapy.
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep Learning; General Adversarial Network; Image Guided Radiation Therapy; Synthetic CT

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33410568      PMCID: PMC7856502          DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


  30 in total

1.  Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction to the scientific issues.

Authors:  Søren M Bentzen; Louis S Constine; Joseph O Deasy; Avi Eisbruch; Andrew Jackson; Lawrence B Marks; Randall K Ten Haken; Ellen D Yorke
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions.

Authors:  D A Low; W B Harms; S Mutic; J A Purdy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  MRI-based treatment planning for brain stereotactic radiosurgery: Dosimetric validation of a learning-based pseudo-CT generation method.

Authors:  Tonghe Wang; Nivedh Manohar; Yang Lei; Anees Dhabaan; Hui-Kuo Shu; Tian Liu; Walter J Curran; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 1.482

4.  MR-OPERA: A Multicenter/Multivendor Validation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Only Prostate Treatment Planning Using Synthetic Computed Tomography Images.

Authors:  Emilia Persson; Christian Gustafsson; Fredrik Nordström; Maja Sohlin; Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson; Karin Petruson; Niina Rintelä; Kristoffer Hed; Lennart Blomqvist; Björn Zackrisson; Tufve Nyholm; Lars E Olsson; Carl Siversson; Joakim Jonsson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Pseudo CT Estimation from MRI Using Patch-based Random Forest.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Yang; Yang Lei; Hui-Kuo Shu; Peter Rossi; Hui Mao; Hyunsuk Shim; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-02

6.  MRI-only brain radiotherapy: Assessing the dosimetric accuracy of synthetic CT images generated using a deep learning approach.

Authors:  Samaneh Kazemifar; Sarah McGuire; Robert Timmerman; Zabi Wardak; Dan Nguyen; Yang Park; Steve Jiang; Amir Owrangi
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Investigation of a method for generating synthetic CT models from MRI scans of the head and neck for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Shu-Hui Hsu; Yue Cao; Ke Huang; Mary Feng; James M Balter
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Generating synthetic CTs from magnetic resonance images using generative adversarial networks.

Authors:  Hajar Emami; Ming Dong; Siamak P Nejad-Davarani; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Estimating CT Image From MRI Data Using Structured Random Forest and Auto-Context Model.

Authors:  Tri Huynh; Yaozong Gao; Jiayin Kang; Li Wang; Pei Zhang; Jun Lian; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Using synthetic CT for partial brain radiation therapy: Impact on image guidance.

Authors:  Eric D Morris; Ryan G Price; Joshua Kim; Lonni Schultz; M Salim Siddiqui; Indrin Chetty; Carri Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-04-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.