Literature DB >> 30115539

MRI-based treatment planning for brain stereotactic radiosurgery: Dosimetric validation of a learning-based pseudo-CT generation method.

Tonghe Wang1, Nivedh Manohar1, Yang Lei1, Anees Dhabaan1, Hui-Kuo Shu1, Tian Liu1, Walter J Curran1, Xiaofeng Yang2.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only radiotherapy treatment planning is attractive since MRI provides superior soft tissue contrast without ionizing radiation compared with computed tomography (CT). However, it requires the generation of pseudo CT from MRI images for patient setup and dose calculation. Our machine-learning-based method to generate pseudo CT images has been shown to provide pseudo CT images with excellent image quality, while its dose calculation accuracy remains an open question. In this study, we aim to investigate the accuracy of dose calculation in brain frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using pseudo CT images which are generated from MRI images using the machine learning-based method developed by our group. We retrospectively investigated a total of 19 treatment plans from 14 patients, each of whom has CT simulation and MRI images acquired during pretreatment. The dose distributions of the same treatment plans were calculated on original CT simulation images as ground truth, as well as on pseudo CT images generated from MRI images. Clinically-relevant DVH metrics and gamma analysis were extracted from both ground truth and pseudo CT results for comparison and evaluation. The side-by-side comparisons on image quality and dose distributions demonstrated very good agreement of image contrast and calculated dose between pseudo CT and original CT. The average differences in Dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics for Planning target volume (PTVs) were less than 0.6%, and no differences in those for organs at risk at a significance level of 0.05. The average pass rate of gamma analysis was 99%. These quantitative results strongly indicate that the pseudo CT images created from MRI images using our proposed machine learning method are accurate enough to replace current CT simulation images for dose calculation in brain SRS treatment. This study also demonstrates the great potential for MRI to completely replace CT scans in the process of simulation and treatment planning.
Copyright © 2018 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; Pseudo CT; Treatment planning

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30115539      PMCID: PMC7775641          DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2018.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  21 in total

Review 1.  Functional MRI for radiotherapy dose painting.

Authors:  Uulke A van der Heide; Antonetta C Houweling; Greetje Groenendaal; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  MRI/linac integration.

Authors:  Jan J W Lagendijk; Bas W Raaymakers; Alexander J E Raaijmakers; Johan Overweg; Kevin J Brown; Ellen M Kerkhof; Richard W van der Put; Björn Hårdemark; Marco van Vulpen; Uulke A van der Heide
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Dosimetric and geometric evaluation of an open low-field magnetic resonance simulator for radiotherapy treatment planning of brain tumours.

Authors:  Brian Holch Kristensen; Finn Jørgen Laursen; Vibeke Løgager; Poul Flemming Geertsen; Anders Krarup-Hansen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  First MR images obtained during megavoltage photon irradiation from a prototype integrated linac-MR system.

Authors:  B G Fallone; B Murray; S Rathee; T Stanescu; S Steciw; S Vidakovic; E Blosser; D Tymofichuk
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Generating patient specific pseudo-CT of the head from MR using atlas-based regression.

Authors:  J Sjölund; D Forsberg; M Andersson; H Knutsson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  MRI simulation for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Slobodan Devic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Results of a multi-institutional benchmark test for cranial CT/MR image registration.

Authors:  Kenneth Ulin; Marcia M Urie; Joel M Cherlow
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Pseudo CT Estimation from MRI Using Patch-based Random Forest.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Yang; Yang Lei; Hui-Kuo Shu; Peter Rossi; Hui Mao; Hyunsuk Shim; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-02

9.  CT substitute derived from MRI sequences with ultrashort echo time.

Authors:  Adam Johansson; Mikael Karlsson; Tufve Nyholm
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Investigation of a method for generating synthetic CT models from MRI scans of the head and neck for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Shu-Hui Hsu; Yue Cao; Ke Huang; Mary Feng; James M Balter
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  18 in total

1.  Dose evaluation of MRI-based synthetic CT generated using a machine learning method for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ghazal Shafai-Erfani; Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Sibo Tian; Pretesh Patel; Ashesh B Jani; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 1.482

2.  MRI-based pseudo CT synthesis using anatomical signature and alternating random forest with iterative refinement model.

Authors:  Yang Lei; Jiwoong Jason Jeong; Tonghe Wang; Hui-Kuo Shu; Pretesh Patel; Sibo Tian; Tian Liu; Hyunsuk Shim; Hui Mao; Ashesh B Jani; Walter J Curran; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-12-05

3.  Deep learning-based image quality improvement for low-dose computed tomography simulation in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Zhen Tian; Xue Dong; Yingzi Liu; Xiaojun Jiang; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Hui-Kuo Shu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-10-24

4.  MRI-based synthetic CT generation using semantic random forest with iterative refinement.

Authors:  Yang Lei; Joseph Harms; Tonghe Wang; Sibo Tian; Jun Zhou; Hui-Kuo Shu; Jim Zhong; Hui Mao; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Learning-based CBCT correction using alternating random forest based on auto-context model.

Authors:  Yang Lei; Xiangyang Tang; Kristin Higgins; Jolinta Lin; Jiwoong Jeong; Tian Liu; Anees Dhabaan; Tonghe Wang; Xue Dong; Robert Press; Walter J Curran; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  MRI classification using semantic random forest with auto-context model.

Authors:  Yang Lei; Tonghe Wang; Xue Dong; Sibo Tian; Yingzi Liu; Hui Mao; Walter J Curran; Hui-Kuo Shu; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-12

Review 7.  Machine learning in quantitative PET: A review of attenuation correction and low-count image reconstruction methods.

Authors:  Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Yabo Fu; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Jonathon A Nye; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.685

8.  Multimodal MRI synthesis using unified generative adversarial networks.

Authors:  Xianjin Dai; Yang Lei; Yabo Fu; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Hui Mao; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  MRI-Based Proton Treatment Planning for Base of Skull Tumors.

Authors:  Ghazal Shafai-Erfani; Yang Lei; Yingzi Liu; Yinan Wang; Tonghe Wang; Jim Zhong; Tian Liu; Mark McDonald; Walter J Curran; Jun Zhou; Hui-Kuo Shu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2019-09-30

Review 10.  A review of deep learning based methods for medical image multi-organ segmentation.

Authors:  Yabo Fu; Yang Lei; Tonghe Wang; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.