Literature DB >> 3340759

MR imaging artifacts, ferromagnetism, and magnetic torque of intravascular filters, stents, and coils.

G P Teitelbaum1, W G Bradley, B D Klein.   

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in which various intravascular filters, stents, and coils were imaged using magnetic resonance (MR) spin-echo technique at 0.35 T. These devices were also evaluated for ferromagnetism (at 0.35, 1.5, and 4.7 T), magnetic torque (at 0.35 and 1.5 T), and magnetically induced migration within a plastic tube (at 0.35 and 1.5 T for the Greenfield filter [GF]). The stainless-steel GF was evaluated in vitro for its propensity to perforate canine inferior venae cavae (IVC). Magnetic force and torque at 1.5 T did not dislodge the GF or result in perforation of canine IVC by the GF. Beta-3 titanium alloy (used in a new percutaneous version of the GF) is apparently one of the best-suited metals for use with MR imaging because of its lack of ferromagnetism (up to 4.7 T) and absence of MR imaging artifacts (at 0.35 T). Devices composed of Elgiloy (Mobin-Uddin filter), nitinol, and MP32-N (Amplatz filter) alloys all created mild artifacts. Devices fashioned from 304 and 316L (GF and Palmaz stent) stainless-steel alloys created severe "black-hole" artifacts, with the 304 alloy devices also showing marked image distortion. Generally, the greater the ferromagnetism of a device, the greater its magnetic susceptibility artifact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3340759     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.166.3.3340759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  17 in total

1.  In vitro image characteristics of an abdominal aortic stent graft: CTA versus 3D MRA.

Authors:  P R Hilfiker; H H Quick; M Schmidt; J F Debatin
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Comparative performance evaluation of automated segmentation methods of hippocampus from magnetic resonance images of temporal lobe epilepsy patients.

Authors:  Mohammad-Parsa Hosseini; Mohammad-Reza Nazem-Zadeh; Dario Pompili; Kourosh Jafari-Khouzani; Kost Elisevich; Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Magnetic resonance characteristics of the LGM vena cava filter: technical note.

Authors:  P M Kiproff; Z L Deeb; F M Contractor; M B Khoury
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Extensive pneumatized air cells causing susceptibility artifacts in the petrosus part of the ICA.

Authors:  M R McCoy; E Broussalis; M Killer; J Steinbacher; F Klausner
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.649

7.  Evaluation of ferromagnetism and magnetic resonance imaging artifacts of the Strecker tantalum vascular stent.

Authors:  G P Teitelbaum; M Raney; M J Carvlin; A H Matsumoto; K H Barth
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Magnetic resonance angiography of intravascular endoprostheses: investigation of three devices.

Authors:  J P Laissy; C Grand; C Matos; J Struyven; J F Berger; E Schouman-Claeys
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of the spine after surgery with or without implant.

Authors:  H Leclet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  A standardized evaluation of artefacts from metallic compounds during fast MR imaging.

Authors:  Shumei Murakami; Rinus G Verdonschot; Miyoshi Kataoka; Naoya Kakimoto; Hiroaki Shimamoto; Sven Kreiborg
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.