Literature DB >> 35451780

Accounting for Correlation Between Traits in Genomic Prediction.

Osval Antonio Montesinos-López1, Abelardo Montesinos-López2, Brandon A Mosqueda-Gonzalez3, José Cricelio Montesinos-López4, José Crossa5,6.   

Abstract

Genomic enabled prediction is playing a key role for the success of genomic selection (GS). However, according to the No Free Lunch Theorem, there is not a universal model that performs well for all data sets. Due to this, many statistical and machine learning models are available for genomic prediction. When multitrait data is available, models that are able to account for correlations between phenotypic traits are preferred, since these models help increase the prediction accuracy when the degree of correlation is moderate to large. For this reason, in this chapter we review multitrait models for genome-enabled prediction and we illustrate the power of this model with real examples. In addition, we provide details of the software (R code) available for its application to help users implement these models with its own data. The multitrait models were implemented under conventional Bayesian Ridge regression and best linear unbiased predictor, but also under a deep learning framework. The multitrait deep learning framework helps implement prediction models with mixed outcomes (continuous, binary, ordinal, and count, measured on different scales), which is not easy in conventional statistical models. The illustrative examples are very detailed in order to make the implementation of multitrait models in plant and animal breeding friendlier for breeders and scientists.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian methods; Deep learning methods; Genomic selection; Multitrait; Plant breeding

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35451780     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2205-6_10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  5 in total

1.  Multiple-trait genomic selection methods increase genetic value prediction accuracy.

Authors:  Yi Jia; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Accuracy of multi-trait genomic selection using different methods.

Authors:  Mario P L Calus; Roel F Veerkamp
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Novel applications of multitask learning and multiple output regression to multiple genetic trait prediction.

Authors:  Dan He; David Kuhn; Laxmi Parida
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  A review of deep learning applications for genomic selection.

Authors:  Osval Antonio Montesinos-López; Abelardo Montesinos-López; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; José Alberto Barrón-López; Johannes W R Martini; Silvia Berenice Fajardo-Flores; Laura S Gaytan-Lugo; Pedro C Santana-Mancilla; José Crossa
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Advantages and limitations of multiple-trait genomic prediction for Fusarium head blight severity in hybrid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Authors:  Albert W Schulthess; Yusheng Zhao; C Friedrich H Longin; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 5.699

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.