Literature DB >> 25041632

Microbiology of sugar-rich environments: diversity, ecology and system constraints.

Bart Lievens1, John E Hallsworth, Maria I Pozo, Zouhaier Ben Belgacem, Andrew Stevenson, Kris A Willems, Hans Jacquemyn.   

Abstract

Microbial habitats that contain an excess of carbohydrate in the form of sugar are widespread in the microbial biosphere. Depending on the type of sugar, prevailing water activity and other substances present, sugar-rich environments can be highly dynamic or relatively stable, osmotically stressful, and/or destabilizing for macromolecular systems, and can thereby strongly impact the microbial ecology. Here, we review the microbiology of different high-sugar habitats, including their microbial diversity and physicochemical parameters, which act to impact microbial community assembly and constrain the ecosystem. Saturated sugar beet juice and floral nectar are used as case studies to explore the differences between the microbial ecologies of low and higher water-activity habitats respectively. Nectar is a paradigm of an open, dynamic and biodiverse habitat populated by many microbial taxa, often yeasts and bacteria such as, amongst many others, Metschnikowia spp. and Acinetobacter spp., respectively. By contrast, thick juice is a relatively stable, species-poor habitat and is typically dominated by a single, xerotolerant bacterium (Tetragenococcus halophilus). A number of high-sugar habitats contain chaotropic solutes (e.g. ethyl acetate, phenols, ethanol, fructose and glycerol) and hydrophobic stressors (e.g. ethyl octanoate, hexane, octanol and isoamyl acetate), all of which can induce chaotropicity-mediated stresses that inhibit or prevent multiplication of microbes. Additionally, temperature, pH, nutrition, microbial dispersion and habitat history can determine or constrain the microbiology of high-sugar milieux. Findings are discussed in relation to a number of unanswered scientific questions.
© 2014 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25041632     DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.12570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 1462-2912            Impact factor:   5.491


  42 in total

1.  Protective role of glycerol against benzene stress: insights from the Pseudomonas putida proteome.

Authors:  Prashanth Bhaganna; Agata Bielecka; Gabriella Molinari; John E Hallsworth
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.886

2.  Stress tolerance and virulence of insect-pathogenic fungi are determined by environmental conditions during conidial formation.

Authors:  Drauzio E N Rangel; Gilberto U L Braga; Éverton K K Fernandes; Chad A Keyser; John E Hallsworth; Donald W Roberts
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.886

3.  A genomic investigation of ecological differentiation between free-living and Drosophila-associated bacteria.

Authors:  Nathan J Winans; Alec Walter; Bessem Chouaia; John M Chaston; Angela E Douglas; Peter D Newell
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Physiological responses of insects to microbial fermentation products: Insights from the interactions between Drosophila and acetic acid.

Authors:  Geonho Kim; Jia Hsin Huang; John G McMullen; Peter D Newell; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.354

Review 5.  The ecology of insect-yeast relationships and its relevance to human industry.

Authors:  Anne A Madden; Mary Jane Epps; Tadashi Fukami; Rebecca E Irwin; John Sheppard; D Magdalena Sorger; Robert R Dunn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Effects of pollen and nectar inoculation by yeasts, bacteria or both on bumblebee colony development.

Authors:  María I Pozo; Toon Mariën; Gaby van Kemenade; Felix Wäckers; Hans Jacquemyn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Reduction of the temperature sensitivity of Halomonas hydrothermalis by iron starvation combined with microaerobic conditions.

Authors:  Jesse P Harrison; John E Hallsworth; Charles S Cockell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Assessing the potential of wild yeasts for bioethanol production.

Authors:  Stefan Ruyters; Vaskar Mukherjee; Kevin J Verstrepen; Johan M Thevelein; Kris A Willems; Bart Lievens
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  Concomitant osmotic and chaotropicity-induced stresses in Aspergillus wentii: compatible solutes determine the biotic window.

Authors:  Flávia de Lima Alves; Andrew Stevenson; Esther Baxter; Jenny L M Gillion; Fakhrossadat Hejazi; Sandra Hayes; Ian E G Morrison; Bernard A Prior; Terry J McGenity; Drauzio E N Rangel; Naresh Magan; Kenneth N Timmis; John E Hallsworth
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.886

10.  The microbiota influences the Drosophila melanogaster life history strategy.

Authors:  Amber W Walters; Rachel C Hughes; Tanner B Call; Carson J Walker; Hailey Wilcox; Samara C Petersen; Seth M Rudman; Peter D Newell; Angela E Douglas; Paul S Schmidt; John M Chaston
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 6.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.