Literature DB >> 33403669

Exploring valence bias as a metric for frontoamygdalar connectivity and depressive symptoms in childhood.

Nathan M Petro1, Nim Tottenham2, Maital Neta1.   

Abstract

Negativity bias is a core feature of depression that is associated with dysfunctional frontoamygdalar connectivity; this pathway is associated with emotion regulation and sensitive to neurobiological change during puberty. We used a valence bias task (ratings of emotional ambiguity) as a potential early indicator of depression risk and differences in frontoamygdalar connectivity. Previous work using this task demonstrated that children normatively have a negative bias that attenuates with maturation. Here, we test the hypothesis that persistence of this negativity bias as maturation ensues may reveal differences in emotion regulation development, and may be associated with increased risk for depression. In children aged 6-13 years, we tested the moderating role of puberty on relationships between valence bias, depressive symptoms, and frontoamygdalar connectivity. A negative bias was associated with increased depressive symptoms for those at more advanced pubertal stages (within this sample) and less regulatory frontoamygdalar connectivity, whereas a more positive bias was associated with more regulatory connectivity patterns. These data suggest that with maturation, individual differences in positivity biases and associated emotion regulation circuitry confer a differential risk for depression. Longitudinal work is necessary to determine the directionality of these effects and explore the influence of early life events.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amygdala; emotion; medial prefrontal cortex; negativity bias; puberty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33403669      PMCID: PMC8255333          DOI: 10.1002/dev.22084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychobiol        ISSN: 0012-1630            Impact factor:   3.038


  107 in total

Review 1.  Development of gender differences in depression: an elaborated cognitive vulnerability-transactional stress theory.

Authors:  B L Hankin; L Y Abramson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Comparison of fMRI activation at 3 and 1.5 T during perceptual, cognitive, and affective processing.

Authors:  B Krasnow; L Tamm; M D Greicius; T T Yang; G H Glover; A L Reiss; V Menon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Cognitive theory and therapy of anxiety and depression: convergence with neurobiological findings.

Authors:  David A Clark; Aaron T Beck
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Interpretation of homophones related to threat in anxiety states.

Authors:  A Mathews; A Richards; M Eysenck
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1989-02

Review 5.  The developing amygdala: a student of the world and a teacher of the cortex.

Authors:  Nim Tottenham; Laurel J Gabard-Durnam
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2017-06-23

6.  Biased attention in childhood anxiety disorders: a preliminary study.

Authors:  M W Vasey; E L Daleiden; L L Williams; L M Brown
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1995-04

7.  The relations of emotionality and regulation to preschoolers' social skills and sociometric status.

Authors:  N Eisenberg; R A Fabes; J Bernzweig; M Karbon; R Poulin; L Hanish
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1993-10

Review 8.  Pubertal onset as a critical transition for neural development and cognition.

Authors:  Janice M Juraska; Jari Willing
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Pubertal stage and brain anatomy in girls.

Authors:  R E Blanton; R E Cooney; J Joormann; F Eugène; G H Glover; I H Gotlib
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Developmental trajectories of child to adolescent externalizing behavior and adult DSM-IV disorder: results of a 24-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Joni Reef; Sofia Diamantopoulou; Inge van Meurs; Frank C Verhulst; Jan van der Ende
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-10       Impact factor: 4.328

View more
  4 in total

1.  Interpersonal emotion regulation mitigates the link between trait neuroticism and a more negative valence bias.

Authors:  Rebecca L Brock; Nicholas R Harp; Maital Neta
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  Positivity effect in aging: evidence for the primacy of positive responses to emotional ambiguity.

Authors:  Nathan M Petro; Ruby Basyouni; Maital Neta
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 5.133

3.  Social connectedness and negative affect uniquely explain individual differences in response to emotional ambiguity.

Authors:  Maital Neta; Rebecca L Brock
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Individual differences in amygdala volumes predict changes in functional connectivity between subcortical and cognitive control networks throughout adolescence.

Authors:  Brittany K Taylor; Michaela R Frenzel; Jacob A Eastman; Christine M Embury; Oktay Agcaoglu; Yu-Ping Wang; Julia M Stephen; Vince D Calhoun; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 6.556

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.