Literature DB >> 12725758

Comparison of fMRI activation at 3 and 1.5 T during perceptual, cognitive, and affective processing.

B Krasnow1, L Tamm, M D Greicius, T T Yang, G H Glover, A L Reiss, V Menon.   

Abstract

Previous studies comparing fMRI data acquired at 1.5 T and higher field strengths have focused on examining signal increases in the visual and motor cortices. No information is, however, available on the relative gain, or the comparability of data, obtained at higher field strengths for other brain regions such as the prefrontal and other association cortices. In the present study, we investigated fMRI activation at 1.5 and 3 T during visual perception, visuospatial working memory, and affect-processing tasks. A 23% increase in striate and extrastriate activation volume was observed at 3 T compared with that for 1.5 T during the visual perception task. During the working memory task significant increases in activation volume were observed in frontal and parietal association cortices as well as subcortical structures, including the caudate, globus pallidus, putamen, and thalamus. Increases in working memory-related activation volume of 82, 73, 83, and 36% were observed in the left frontal, right frontal, left parietal, and right parietal lobes, respectively, for 3 T compared with 1.5 T. These increases were characterized by increased activation at 3 T in several prefrontal and parietal cortex regions that showed activation at 1.5 T. More importantly, at 3 T, activation was detected in several regions, such as the ventral aspects of the inferior frontal gyrus, orbitofrontal gyrus, and lingual gyrus, which did not show significant activation at 1.5 T. No difference in height or extent of activation was detected between the two scanners in the amygdala during affect processing. Signal dropout in the amygdala from susceptibility artifact was greater at 3 T, with a 12% dropout at 3 T compared with a 9% dropout at 1.5 T. The spatial smoothness of T2* images was greater at 3 T by less than 1 mm, suggesting that the greater extent of activation at 3 T beyond these spatial scales was not due primarily to increased intrinsic spatial correlations at 3 T. Rather, the increase in percentage of voxels activated reflects increased sensitivity for detection of brain activation at higher field strength. In summary, our findings suggest that functional imaging of prefrontal and other association cortices can benefit significantly from higher magnetic field strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12725758     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00002-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  46 in total

1.  Neurotransmitter interactions in psychotropic drug action: beyond dopamine and serotonin.

Authors:  Andrew J Greenshaw
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 2.  Spiral imaging in fMRI.

Authors:  Gary H Glover
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  A systematic review of the utility of 1.5 versus 3 Tesla magnetic resonance brain imaging in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Joanna M Wardlaw; Will Brindle; Ana M Casado; Kirsten Shuler; Moira Henderson; Brenda Thomas; Jennifer Macfarlane; Susana Muñoz Maniega; Katherine Lymer; Zoe Morris; Cyril Pernet; William Nailon; Trevor Ahearn; Abdul Nashirudeen Mumuni; Carlos Mugruza; John McLean; Goultchira Chakirova; Yuehui Terry Tao; Johanna Simpson; Andrew C Stanfield; Harriet Johnston; Jehill Parikh; Natalie A Royle; Janet De Wilde; Mark E Bastin; Nick Weir; Andrew Farrall; Maria C Valdes Hernandez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Effects of combining field strengths on auditory functional MRI group analysis: 1.5T and 3T.

Authors:  Kihwan Han; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Suicide attempters with Borderline Personality Disorder show differential orbitofrontal and parietal recruitment when reflecting on aversive memories.

Authors:  Jennifer A Silvers; Alexa D Hubbard; Sadia Chaudhury; Emily Biggs; Jocelyn Shu; Michael F Grunebaum; Eric Fertuck; Jochen Weber; Hedy Kober; Amanda Carson-Wong; Beth S Brodsky; Megan Chesin; Kevin N Ochsner; Barbara Stanley
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 4.791

6.  Activation volume vs BOLD signal change as measures of fMRI activation - Its impact on GABA - fMRI activation correlation.

Authors:  Pallab K Bhattacharyya; Micheal D Phillips; Lael A Stone; Mark J Lowe
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Hippocampal atrophy confounds template-based functional MR imaging measures of hippocampal activation in patients with mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  C K Sandstrom; S Krishnan; M J Slavin; T-T T Tran; P M Doraiswamy; J R Petrella
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Integrating rewards and cognition in the frontal cortex.

Authors:  Alison M Gilbert; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  fMRI-acoustic noise alters brain activation during working memory tasks.

Authors:  D Tomasi; E C Caparelli; L Chang; T Ernst
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Different structures involved during ictal and interictal epileptic activity in malformations of cortical development: an EEG-fMRI study.

Authors:  L Tyvaert; C Hawco; E Kobayashi; P LeVan; F Dubeau; J Gotman
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.