Literature DB >> 33403510

Evaluation of peak skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: relationship with fluoroscopic pulse rate and target vessel.

Takuro Tanaka1,2, Kosuke Matsubara3, Satoshi Kobayashi3.   

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the peak skin dose (PSD) associated with radiation skin injury and the fluoroscopic pulse rate or target vessel during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures. We consecutively included 213 patients who underwent PCI procedures. The fluoroscopic time (FT), total number of cine frames, reference air kerma (RAK), and PSD were compared between the two types of fluoroscopic pulse rates (10 and 7.5 pulses/s) and among target vessels. The total number of X-ray tube angulations for each target vessel was also investigated. The median FT was 21.5 min in the 10 pulses/s group and 19.4 min in the 7.5 pulses/s group (p = 0.068, Wilcoxon rank sum test). The median PSD in the 10 pulses/s group was 749 mGy, which was significantly higher than that in the 7.5 pulses/s group (549 mGy) (p < 0.001). The median RAK in the right coronary artery (RCA) was equivalent to that in the left anterior descending artery. However, among the target vessels, the median PSD tended to be the highest in the RCA. There was a difference in the X-ray tube angulation used depending on the target vessel. PCI in the RCA used the left anterior oblique angle more frequently than PCI in the other vessels and tended to use only one angulation. The calculated PSD was related to the target vessel of the PCI procedure, and it was also closely related to the X-ray tube angulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dosimetry; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Radiation protection; Skin dose; Target vessel; Tube angulation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33403510     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-020-00599-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  4 in total

1.  Patient doses and occupational exposure in a hybrid operating room.

Authors:  C Andrés; H Pérez-García; M Agulla; R Torres; D Miguel; A Del Castillo; C M Flota; D Alonso; J de Frutos; C Vaquero
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 2.  Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures.

Authors:  J Valentin
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2000

3.  Evaluation of Entrance Skin Dose during Catheter Ablation Procedures by Use of Reference Air-Kerma Displayed on Angiography Systems.

Authors:  Shigenobu Seguchi; Takaya Saijo; Yoshinobu Ishikawa; Tatsuji Nagao
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  Sarcopenia among patients receiving hemodialysis: weighing the evidence.

Authors:  Piyawan Kittiskulnam; Juan J Carrero; Glenn M Chertow; George A Kaysen; Cynthia Delgado; Kirsten L Johansen
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 12.910

  4 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  What are useful methods to reduce occupational radiation exposure among radiological medical workers, especially for interventional radiology personnel?

Authors:  Koichi Chida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2022-05-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.