Literature DB >> 33403503

Time intervals between semen production, initiation of analysis, and IUI significantly influence clinical pregnancies and live births.

U Punjabi1,2, H Van Mulders3, L Van de Velde3, I Goovaerts3, K Peeters3,4, W Cassauwers3, T Lyubetska3, K Clasen3, P Janssens3, O Zemtsova3, E Roelant5, D De Neubourg3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Does IDEF mapping help monitor the technical process of IUI and explore the potential improvements which might contribute to increased pregnancy and live birth rates?
METHOD: Retrospective analysis of 1729 homologous IUI cycles of couples attending a fertility clinic in a university hospital setting. Standardized conventional semen parameters were analyzed and the semen samples prepared via discontinuous density gradient centrifugation.
RESULTS: There was no significant association between sperm concentration, motility and morphology (analysis phase), and pregnancy outcome. Only female and male ages were significantly associated with the pregnancy outcome. There was a significant difference in the odds on clinical pregnancies and live births when analysis was ≤ 21 min initiated, and < 107 min between sample production and IUI, adjusted for male and female age.
CONCLUSIONS: Adjusting for the couple's age, we could show that time intervals between semen production and analysis and IUI when kept low significantly influenced clinical pregnancies and live births.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Density gradient centrifugation; IDEF modeling; Intrauterine insemination; Semen parameters

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33403503      PMCID: PMC7884513          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-02020-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  43 in total

Review 1.  Predictive value of normal sperm morphology in intrauterine insemination (IUI): a structured literature review.

Authors:  J Van Waart; T F Kruger; C J Lombard; W Ombelet
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 15.610

2.  Prewash total motile count is a poor predictor of live birth in intrauterine insemination cycles.

Authors:  Erin B Mankus; Alan E Holden; Paige M Seeker; Jordan C Kampschmidt; Jessica E McLaughlin; Robert S Schenken; Jennifer F Knudtson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Semen quality and prediction of IUI success in male subfertility: a systematic review.

Authors:  Willem Ombelet; Nathalie Dhont; Annelies Thijssen; Eugene Bosmans; Thinus Kruger
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.828

4.  Predictive value of sperm morphology and progressively motile sperm count for pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Louise Lemmens; Snjezana Kos; Cornelis Beijer; Jacoline W Brinkman; Frans A L van der Horst; Leonie van den Hoven; Dorit C Kieslinger; Netty J van Trooyen-van Vrouwerff; Albert Wolthuis; Jan C M Hendriks; Alex M M Wetzels
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  ESHRE basic semen analysis courses 1995-1999: immediate beneficial effects of standardized training.

Authors:  L Björndahl; C L R Barratt; L R Fraser; U Kvist; D Mortimer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  'How to count sperm properly': checklist for acceptability of studies based on human semen analysis.

Authors:  Lars Björndahl; Christopher L R Barratt; David Mortimer; Pierre Jouannet
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Intrauterine insemination after ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate: predictive potential of inseminating motile count and sperm morphology.

Authors:  W Ombelet; H Vandeput; G Van de Putte; A Cox; M Janssen; P Jacobs; E Bosmans; O Steeno; T Kruger
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Clinical success of intrauterine insemination cycles is affected by the sperm preparation time.

Authors:  Patricia Fauque; Philippe Lehert; Marjorie Lamotte; Karima Bettahar-Lebugle; Alphée Bailly; Catherine Diligent; Michel Clédat; Paul Pierrot; Marie-Lorraine Guénédal; Paul Sagot
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Prognosis factors of pregnancy after intrauterine insemination with the husband's sperm: conclusions of an analysis of 2,019 cycles.

Authors:  Laka Dinelli; Blandine Courbière; Vincent Achard; Elisabeth Jouve; Carole Deveze; Audrey Gnisci; Jean-Marie Grillo; Odile Paulmyer-Lacroix
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Advanced paternal age alone does not adversely affect pregnancy or live-birth rates or sperm parameters following intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Takayuki Tatsumi; Eri Ishida; Kuniko Tatsumi; Yumiko Okada; Takakazu Saito; Toshiro Kubota; Hidekazu Saito
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-07-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.