Delia A Gheorghe1,2, Muriel T N Panouillères3,4,5, Nicholas D Walsh6. 1. School of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 3. Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 4. CIAMS, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405, Orsay Cedex, France. 5. CIAMS, Université d'Orléans, 45067, Orléans, France. 6. School of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. nicholas.walsh@uea.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) over the prefrontal cortex has been shown to modulate subjective, neuronal and neuroendocrine responses, particularly in the context of stress processing. However, it is currently unknown whether tDCS stimulation over other brain regions, such as the cerebellum, can similarly affect the stress response. Despite increasing evidence linking the cerebellum to stress-related processing, no studies have investigated the hormonal and behavioural effects of cerebellar tDCS. METHODS: This study tested the hypothesis of a cerebellar tDCS effect on mood, behaviour and cortisol. To do this we employed a single-blind, sham-controlled design to measure performance on a cerebellar-dependent saccadic adaptation task, together with changes in cortisol output and mood, during online anodal and cathodal stimulation. Forty-five participants were included in the analysis. Stimulation groups were matched on demographic variables, potential confounding factors known to affect cortisol levels, mood and a number of personality characteristics. RESULTS: Results showed that tDCS polarity did not affect cortisol levels or subjective mood, but did affect behaviour. Participants receiving anodal stimulation showed an 8.4% increase in saccadic adaptation, which was significantly larger compared to the cathodal group (1.6%). CONCLUSION: The stimulation effect on saccadic adaptation contributes to the current body of literature examining the mechanisms of cerebellar stimulation on associated function. We conclude that further studies are needed to understand whether and how cerebellar tDCS may module stress reactivity under challenge conditions.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) over the prefrontal cortex has been shown to modulate subjective, neuronal and neuroendocrine responses, particularly in the context of stress processing. However, it is currently unknown whether tDCS stimulation over other brain regions, such as the cerebellum, can similarly affect the stress response. Despite increasing evidence linking the cerebellum to stress-related processing, no studies have investigated the hormonal and behavioural effects of cerebellar tDCS. METHODS: This study tested the hypothesis of a cerebellar tDCS effect on mood, behaviour and cortisol. To do this we employed a single-blind, sham-controlled design to measure performance on a cerebellar-dependent saccadic adaptation task, together with changes in cortisol output and mood, during online anodal and cathodal stimulation. Forty-five participants were included in the analysis. Stimulation groups were matched on demographic variables, potential confounding factors known to affect cortisol levels, mood and a number of personality characteristics. RESULTS: Results showed that tDCS polarity did not affect cortisol levels or subjective mood, but did affect behaviour. Participants receiving anodal stimulation showed an 8.4% increase in saccadic adaptation, which was significantly larger compared to the cathodal group (1.6%). CONCLUSION: The stimulation effect on saccadic adaptation contributes to the current body of literature examining the mechanisms of cerebellar stimulation on associated function. We conclude that further studies are needed to understand whether and how cerebellar tDCS may module stress reactivity under challenge conditions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cerebellum; Cortisol; Saccadic adaptation; Transcranial direct current stimulation
Authors: Chris Baeken; Rudi De Raedt; Lemke Leyman; Johan Schiettecatte; Kris Poppe; Leon Kaufman; Margot Haes; Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt; Ellen Anckaert; Hugo D'Haenen Journal: World J Biol Psychiatry Date: 2009 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Andrea Antal; Thomas Fischer; Catarina Saiote; Robert Miller; Leila Chaieb; Danny J J Wang; Franziska Plessow; Walter Paulus; Clemens Kirschbaum Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2013-12-31 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Andre R Brunoni; Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt; Paulo S Boggio; Felipe Fregni; Eduardo Miranda Dantas; José G Mill; Paulo A Lotufo; Isabela M Benseñor Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2012-05-22 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Dragana I Claflin; Kevin D Schmidt; Zachary D Vallandingham; Michal Kraszpulski; Michael B Hennessy Journal: Neurobiol Learn Mem Date: 2017-05-22 Impact factor: 2.877