Literature DB >> 22626867

Polarity- and valence-dependent effects of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation on heart rate variability and salivary cortisol.

Andre R Brunoni1, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt, Paulo S Boggio, Felipe Fregni, Eduardo Miranda Dantas, José G Mill, Paulo A Lotufo, Isabela M Benseñor.   

Abstract

Recent evidence has supported the notion that the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) and the sympatho-adreno-medullary (SAM) systems are modulated by cortical structures such as the prefrontal cortex. This top-down modulation may play a major role in the neuroendocrine changes associated with stressful events. We aimed to investigate further this hypothesis by modulating directly prefrontal cortex excitability using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) - a non-invasive, neuromodulatory tool that induces polarity-dependent changes in cortical excitability - and measuring effects on salivary cortisol and heart rate variability as proxies of the HPA and SAM systems. Twenty healthy participants with no clinical and neuropsychiatric conditions were randomized to receive bifrontal tDCS (left anodal/right cathodal or left cathodal/right anodal) or sham stimulation, in a within-subject design. During each stimulation session, after a resting period, subjects were shown images with neutral or negative valence. Our findings showed that excitability enhancing left anodal tDCS induced a decrease in cortisol levels. This effect is more pronounced during emotional negative stimuli. Moreover, vagal activity was higher during left anodal tDCS and emotional negative stimuli, as compared to sham stimulation and neutral images. We also observed an association between higher mood scores, higher vagal activation and lower cortisol levels for anodal stimulation. Subjective mood and anxiety evaluation revealed no specific changes after stimulation. Our findings suggest that tDCS induced transient, polarity specific modulatory top-down effects with anodal tDCS leading to a down-regulation of HPA and SAM systems. Further research using tDCS and neuroendocrine markers should explore the mechanisms of stress regulation in healthy and clinical samples.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22626867     DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology        ISSN: 0306-4530            Impact factor:   4.905


  31 in total

1.  Effects of prefrontal rTMS on autonomic reactions to affective pictures.

Authors:  Christoph Berger; Gregor Domes; Johannes Balschat; Johannes Thome; Jacqueline Höppner
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Transcranial electrical stimulation modifies the neuronal response to psychosocial stress exposure.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Thomas Fischer; Catarina Saiote; Robert Miller; Leila Chaieb; Danny J J Wang; Franziska Plessow; Walter Paulus; Clemens Kirschbaum
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Mitigation of stress: new treatment alternatives.

Authors:  Ahmad Rauf Subhani; Nidal Kamel; Mohamad Naufal Mohamad Saad; Nanda Nandagopal; Kenneth Kang; Aamir Saeed Malik
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Cytokines plasma levels during antidepressant treatment with sertraline and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): results from a factorial, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  André R Brunoni; Rodrigo Machado-Vieira; Carlos A Zarate; Leandro Valiengo; Erica Lm Vieira; Isabela M Benseñor; Paulo A Lotufo; Wagner F Gattaz; Antonio L Teixeira
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Cognitive enhancement or cognitive cost: trait-specific outcomes of brain stimulation in the case of mathematics anxiety.

Authors:  Amar Sarkar; Ann Dowker; Roi Cohen Kadosh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The effects of stress and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on working memory: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yael L E Ankri; Yoram Braw; Galia Luboshits; Oded Meiron
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Association between tDCS computational modeling and clinical outcomes in depression: data from the ELECT-TDCS trial.

Authors:  Paulo J C Suen; Sarah Doll; Marcelo C Batistuzzo; Geraldo Busatto; Lais B Razza; Frank Padberg; Eva Mezger; Lucia Bulubas; Daniel Keeser; Zhi-De Deng; Andre R Brunoni
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 5.270

8.  Enhancing reappraisal of negative emotional memories with transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Nadja Doerig; Rosa J Seinsche; Marius Moisa; Erich Seifritz; Christian C Ruff; Birgit Kleim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A systematic review of non-invasive brain stimulation therapies and cardiovascular risk: implications for the treatment of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Leonardo Augusto Negreiros Parente Capela Sampaio; Renerio Fraguas; Paulo Andrade Lotufo; Isabela Martins Benseñor; André Russowsky Brunoni
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Prefrontal tDCS attenuates counterfactual thinking in female individuals prone to self-critical rumination.

Authors:  Jens Allaert; Rudi De Raedt; Frederik M van der Veen; Chris Baeken; Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.