Literature DB >> 33394202

Prognostic outcomes and risk factors for recurrence after laser vaporization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a single-center retrospective study.

Keisuke Kodama1, Hideaki Yahata2, Kaoru Okugawa1, Hiroshi Tomonobe1, Nobuko Yasutake1, Sachiko Yoshida1, Hiroshi Yagi1, Masafumi Yasunaga1, Tatsuhiro Ohgami1, Ichiro Onoyama1, Kazuo Asanoma1, Emiko Hori1, Mototsugu Shimokawa3, Kiyoko Kato1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is a precancerous lesion that may progress to invasive cervical cancer without intervention. We aim to examine the prognostic outcomes and risk factors for recurrence after laser vaporization for CIN 3, CIN 2 with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, and CIN 1 persisting for more than 2 years.
METHODS: Between 2008 and 2016, a total of 1070 patients underwent cervical laser vaporization using a carbon dioxide laser. We performed a retrospective review of their medical records to assess their clinical characteristics, pathologic factors, and prognostic outcomes.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 34 years (range 18-64 years). The preoperative diagnosis was CIN 1 in 27 patients, CIN 2 in 485 patients, and CIN 3 in 558 patients. Over a median follow-up period of 15 months, the 2-year recurrence rate was 18.9%, and the 5-year recurrence rate was 46.5%. The 2-year retreatment rate was 12.6%, and the 5-year retreatment rate was 30.5%. We diagnosed 9 patients with invasive cancer after treatment; all patients underwent combined multidisciplinary treatment, and there were no deaths during follow-up. The recurrence-free interval was correlated with patient age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.028; 95% CI 1.005-1.051; P = 0.0167), body mass index (HR, 1.052; 95% CI 1.008-1.098; P = 0.0191), and glandular involvement (HR, 1.962; 95% CI 1.353-2.846; P = 0.0004).
CONCLUSIONS: Cervical laser vaporization is effective and useful for patients with CIN who wish to preserve fertility. However, patients with glandular involvement, older age, and higher body weight require close follow-up for recurrence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Laser vaporization; Recurrence-free interval

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33394202     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01848-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  19 in total

Review 1.  Cervical Cancer Screening: More Choices in 2019.

Authors:  George F Sawaya; Karen Smith-McCune; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Kyrgiou; G Koliopoulos; P Martin-Hirsch; M Arbyn; W Prendiville; E Paraskevaidis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-02-11       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Cervical crypt involvement by intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  M C Anderson; R B Hartley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.347

Review 4.  Review of HPV-related diseases and cancers.

Authors:  Pina Brianti; Eduardo De Flammineis; Santo Raffaele Mercuri
Journal:  New Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  Risk of recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful treatment: a long-term multi-cohort study.

Authors:  Mariëlle Kocken; Theo J M Helmerhorst; Johannes Berkhof; Jacqueline A Louwers; Mariëlle A E Nobbenhuis; Aagje G Bais; Cornelis J A Hogewoning; Afra Zaal; René H M Verheijen; Peter J F Snijders; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.

Authors:  Patrice Mathevet; Elias Chemali; Michel Roy; Daniel Dargent
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Prospective randomized trial of LLETZ versus laser ablation in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  R D Alvarez; C W Helm; R P Edwards; R W Naumann; E E Partridge; H M Shingleton; J A McGee; J B Hall; R V Higgins; J M Malone
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  The treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by laser vaporization.

Authors:  J A Jordan; C B Woodman; M J Mylotte; J M Emens; D R Williams; M MacAlary; T Wade-Evans
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1985-04

9.  Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery.

Authors:  Lynn Sadler; Audrey Saftlas; Wenquan Wang; Melissa Exeter; John Whittaker; Lesley McCowan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Laser vaporization versus laser excision conization in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  C K Partington; M J Turner; W P Soutter; M Griffiths; T Krausz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Effect of Surgeon Volume on the Outcome of Laser Vaporization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Michihide Maeda; Tsuyoshi Hisa; Shinya Matsuzaki; Misooja Lee; Seiji Mabuchi; Shoji Kamiura
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.109

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.