Literature DB >> 2649822

Laser vaporization versus laser excision conization in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

C K Partington1, M J Turner, W P Soutter, M Griffiths, T Krausz.   

Abstract

One hundred patients with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia suitable for ablative therapy were randomly allocated to treatment by either laser vaporization or laser excision conization under local anesthesia in the outpatient colposcopy clinic. The two methods were compared with respect to the immediate surgical complications, ease of performance, and long-term complications. They were comparable in most respects, and both were well accepted by the patients. Laser excision had the added advantage of providing further material for histologic examination to confirm the absence of invasion and the completeness of excision of the lesion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2649822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  3 in total

1.  Prognostic outcomes and risk factors for recurrence after laser vaporization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Keisuke Kodama; Hideaki Yahata; Kaoru Okugawa; Hiroshi Tomonobe; Nobuko Yasutake; Sachiko Yoshida; Hiroshi Yagi; Masafumi Yasunaga; Tatsuhiro Ohgami; Ichiro Onoyama; Kazuo Asanoma; Emiko Hori; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Kiyoko Kato
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Evangelos Paraskevaidis; Andrew Bryant; Heather O Dickinson; Sarah L Keep
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-06-16

Review 3.  Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Pierre P L Martin-Hirsch; Evangelos Paraskevaidis; Andrew Bryant; Heather O Dickinson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.