Literature DB >> 21530398

Risk of recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful treatment: a long-term multi-cohort study.

Mariëlle Kocken1, Theo J M Helmerhorst, Johannes Berkhof, Jacqueline A Louwers, Mariëlle A E Nobbenhuis, Aagje G Bais, Cornelis J A Hogewoning, Afra Zaal, René H M Verheijen, Peter J F Snijders, Chris J L M Meijer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: 15% of women treated for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN grade 2 or 3) develop residual or recurrent CIN grade 2 or 3 or cervical cancer, most of which are diagnosed within 2 years of treatment. To gain more insight into the long-term predictive value of different post-treatment strategies, we assessed the long-term cumulative risk of post-treatment CIN grade 2 or 3 or cancer and different follow-up algorithms to identify women at risk of residual or recurrent disease.
METHODS: Women who were included in three studies in the Netherlands and who were treated for CIN grade 2 or 3 between July, 1988, and November, 2004, were followed up by cytology and testing for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) at 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment, and subsequently received cytological screening every 5 years. The primary endpoint was the cumulative risk of post-treatment CIN grade 2 or higher by December, 2009. We also assessed the cumulative risk of CIN grade 2 or higher in women with three consecutive negative cytological smears and women with negative co-testing with cytology and hrHPV at months 6 and 24. This study is registered in the Dutch trial register, NTR1468.
FINDINGS: 435 women were included, 76 (17%) of whom developed post-treatment CIN grade 2 or higher, of which 39 were CIN grade 3 or higher. The 5-year risk of developing post-treatment CIN grade 2 or higher was 16·5% (95% CI 13·0-20·7) and the 10-year risk was 18·3% (13·8-24·0). The 5-year risk of developing post-treatment CIN grade 3 or higher was 8·6% (95% CI 6·0-12·1) and the 10-year risk was 9·2% (5·8-14·2). Women with three consecutive negative cytological smears had a CIN grade 2 or higher risk of 2·9% (95% CI 1·2-7·1) in the next 5 years and of 5·2% (2·1-12·4) in the next 10 years. The 5-year risk of CIN grade 3 or higher was 0·7% (95% CI 0·0-3·9) and the 10-year risk was 0·7% (0·0-6·3). Women with negative results for co-testing had a 5-year risk of CIN grade 2 or higher of 1·0% (95% CI 0·2-4·6) and a 10-year risk of 3·6% (1·1-10·7). The 5-year risk of CIN grade 3 or higher was 0·0% (95% CI 0·0-3·0) and the 10-year risk was 0·0% (0·0-5·3).
INTERPRETATION: The 5-year risk of post-treatment CIN grade 2 or higher in women with three consecutive negative cytological smears or negative co-testing for cytology and hrHPV at 6 and 24 months was similar to that of women with normal cytology in population-based screening and therefore justifies their return to regular screening. FUNDING: VU University Medical Center, Erasmus University Medical Center, Netherlands.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21530398     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70078-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  43 in total

1.  Cervical cancer: squamocolumnar junction ablation--tying up loose ends?

Authors:  Michael Herfs; Christopher P Crum
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Clinical implications of (epi)genetic changes in HPV-induced cervical precancerous lesions.

Authors:  Renske D M Steenbergen; Peter J F Snijders; Daniëlle A M Heideman; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 3.  The incidence of human papillomavirus infection following treatment for cervical neoplasia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anne F Rositch; Heidi M Soeters; Tabatha N Offutt-Powell; Bradford S Wheeler; Sylvia M Taylor; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Long-term costs of introducing HPV-DNA post-treatment surveillance to national cervical cancer screening in Ireland.

Authors:  Maria Agapova; Andrea Duignan; Alan Smith; Ciaran O'Neill; Anirban Basu
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Prognostic outcomes and risk factors for recurrence after laser vaporization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Keisuke Kodama; Hideaki Yahata; Kaoru Okugawa; Hiroshi Tomonobe; Nobuko Yasutake; Sachiko Yoshida; Hiroshi Yagi; Masafumi Yasunaga; Tatsuhiro Ohgami; Ichiro Onoyama; Kazuo Asanoma; Emiko Hori; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Kiyoko Kato
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Human papillomavirus type-specific persistence and reappearance after successful conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Akiko Kudoh; Shinya Sato; Hiroaki Itamochi; Hiroaki Komatsu; Michiko Nonaka; Seiya Sato; Jun Chikumi; Muneaki Shimada; Tetsuro Oishi; Junzo Kigawa; Tasuku Harada
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  DNA methylation and detection of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions using molecular methods.

Authors:  Sandra Mersakova; Marcela Nachajova; Peter Szepe; Petra Sumichrastova Kasajova; Erika Halasova
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-10-12

8.  Five-year risk of recurrence after treatment of CIN 2, CIN 3, or AIS: performance of HPV and Pap cotesting in posttreatment management.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Tina Raine-Bennett; Julia C Gage; Walter K Kinney
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Association Between Positive Human Papillomavirus Status After Conization and Disease Recurrence in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3.

Authors:  Masaki Kamio; Shintaro Yanazume; Shinichi Togami; Hiroaki Kobayashi
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2020-09-10

10.  Necessity for subsequent surgery in women of child-bearing age with positive margins after conization.

Authors:  Xinmei Wang; Juan Xu; Yang Gao; Pengpeng Qu
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.