Literature DB >> 33392695

Does exposure to startle impact voluntary reaching movements in individuals with severe-to-moderate stroke?

Marziye Rahimi1,2, Zoe Swann3, Claire F Honeycutt4.   

Abstract

When movements of individuals with stroke (iwS) are elicited by startling acoustic stimulus (SAS), reaching movements are faster, further, and directed away from the body. However, these startle-evoked movements also elicit task-inappropriate flexor activity, raising concerns that chronic exposure to startle might also induce heightened flexor activity during voluntarily elicited movement. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of startle exposure on voluntary movements during point-to-point reaching in individuals with moderate and severe stroke. We hypothesize that startle exposure will increase task-inappropriate activity in flexor muscles, which will be associated with worse voluntarily initiated reaching performance (e.g. decreased distance, displacement, and final accuracy). Eleven individuals with moderate-to-severe stroke (UEFM = 8-41/66 and MAS = 0-4/4) performed voluntary point-to-point reaching with 1/3 of trials elicited by an SAS. We used electromyography to measure activity in brachioradialis (BR), biceps (BIC), triceps lateral head (TRI), pectoralis (PEC), anterior deltoid (AD), and posterior deltoid (PD). Conversely to our hypothesis, exposure to startle did not increase abnormal flexion but rather antagonist activity in the elbow flexors and shoulder horizontal adductors decreased, suggesting that abnormal flexor/extensor co-contraction was reduced. This reduction of flexion led to increased reaching distance (18.2% farther), movement onset (8.6% faster), and final accuracy (16.1% more accurate) by the end of the session. This study offers the first evidence that exposure to startle in iwS does not negatively impact voluntary movement; moreover, exposure may improve volitionally activated reaching movements by decreasing abnormal flexion activity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abnormal flexor activity; Point-to-point reaching; Rehabilitation; Severe stroke; Startle

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33392695      PMCID: PMC7943527          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-06005-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  45 in total

1.  The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man.

Authors:  T E TWITCHELL
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1951-12       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  The StartReact effect in tasks requiring end-point accuracy.

Authors:  J M Castellote; J Valls-Solé
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Hemispheric specialization and functional impact of ipsilesional deficits in movement coordination and accuracy.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Prepared movements are elicited early by startle.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; J Timothy Inglis; David J Sanderson; Ian M Franks
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Training of reaching in stroke survivors with severe and chronic upper limb paresis using a novel nonrobotic device: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ruth N Barker; Sandra G Brauer; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Neck rotation modulates flexion synergy torques, indicating an ipsilateral reticulospinal source for impairment in stroke.

Authors:  Michael D Ellis; Justin Drogos; Carolina Carmona; Thierry Keller; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Startle evokes nearly identical movements in multi-jointed, two-dimensional reaching tasks.

Authors:  Meilin R Ossanna; Xi Zong; Vengateswaran J Ravichandran; Claire F Honeycutt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Robotic quantification of upper extremity loss of independent joint control or flexion synergy in individuals with hemiparetic stroke: a review of paradigms addressing the effects of shoulder abduction loading.

Authors:  Michael D Ellis; Yiyun Lan; Jun Yao; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Evidence for startle as a measurable behavioral indicator of motor learning.

Authors:  Nathan J Kirkpatrick; Vengateswaran J Ravichandran; Eric J Perreault; Sydney Y Schaefer; Claire F Honeycutt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Brainstem and spinal cord MRI identifies altered sensorimotor pathways post-stroke.

Authors:  Haleh Karbasforoushan; Julien Cohen-Adad; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

1.  Highlights from the 30th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Neural Control of Movement.

Authors:  Marta Russo; Nofar Ozeri-Engelhard; Kathleen Hupfeld; Caroline Nettekoven; Simon Thibault; Ehsan Sedaghat-Nejad; Daniela Buchwald; David Xing; Omid Zobeiri; Konstantina Kilteni; Scott T Albert; Giacomo Ariani
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.974

2.  Startle Increases the Incidence of Anticipatory Muscle Activations but Does Not Change the Task-Specific Muscle Onset for Patients After Subacute Stroke.

Authors:  Nan Xia; Chang He; Yang-An Li; Minghui Gu; Zejian Chen; Xiupan Wei; Jiang Xu; Xiaolin Huang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.003

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.