Literature DB >> 25754260

The StartReact effect in tasks requiring end-point accuracy.

J M Castellote1, J Valls-Solé2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Fast and accurate movements are often performed in response to a sensory signal. In reaction time tasks, execution of open loop movements is speeded up when a startling auditory stimulus (SAS) is applied together with the imperative signal (IS). In this study, we examined the effects of a SAS on the performance of a task that demands accuracy.
METHODS: Nine subjects were asked to move a monitored pen to a target point located in a table at a fixed angular distance of 30 degrees from a start point. The target was a spot of three possible diameters: 5, 10, and 20mm. Finger force for pen holding, pen tip pressure against the table and kinematic variables of the forearm movement were measured for three conditions: control, SAS delivered at IS (SAS-IS trials) and SAS delivered during movement execution (SAS-MOV trials).
RESULTS: Two movement phases could be identified in the movement trajectory and force profile. The first phase, ballistic, was significantly shortened in SAS-MOV trials, with earlier and larger peak velocity and peak force with respect to control trials. The second phase, slow approach to target, was longer in SAS-IS trials but not in SAS-MOV trials. Accuracy was maintained throughout all conditions and stimulation modes.
CONCLUSIONS: A SAS speeds up only the first (ballistic) part of the movement in an accuracy task. Slower target approach compensates for the accelerated initial movement. No changes in the last part of the movement are seen when a SAS is delivered after movement onset. SIGNIFICANCE: The StartReact effect is restricted to the onset of a complex movement, when muscles are activated in a ballistic mode, without feedback.
Copyright © 2015 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Motor control; Motor task; Startle

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25754260     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.01.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  4 in total

1.  Startle reveals decreased response preparatory activation during a stop-signal task.

Authors:  Neil M Drummond; Erin K Cressman; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Does exposure to startle impact voluntary reaching movements in individuals with severe-to-moderate stroke?

Authors:  Marziye Rahimi; Zoe Swann; Claire F Honeycutt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  StartReact effects in first dorsal interosseous muscle are absent in a pinch task, but present when combined with elbow flexion.

Authors:  Juan M Castellote; Markus Kofler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessment of trunk flexion in arm reaching tasks with electromyography and smartphone accelerometry in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  Yolanda Castillo-Escario; Hatice Kumru; Josep Valls-Solé; Loreto García-Alen; Joan Vidal; Raimon Jané
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.