Huan Mao1, Xiuhong Guan1, Kewen Peng2, Yanjun Cai1, Jing Yang1, Xueping He3, Hanwei Chen3, Xiaoyong Zhang4, Xiaoming Bi5, Xin Liu6, Debiao Li7, Zhaoyang Fan7, Zhixian Deng1, Guoxi Xie1. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. 2. Department of Radiology, Nanshan People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China. 3. Department of Radiology, Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, China. 4. MR Collaborations, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Shenzhen, China. 5. MR R&D, Siemens Healthineers, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 6. Paul C. Lauterbur Biomedical Imaging Center, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Shenzhen, China. 7. Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Black-blood thrombus imaging (BTI) has shown to be advantageous for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, previous techniques using fast spin echo have a high specific absorption rate. As DANTE (delay alternating with nutation for tailored excitation) black-blood preparation can suppress blood flows over a broad range of velocities, we hypothesized that a DANTE black-blood preparation combined with a fast low-angle shot (FLASH) gradient-echo readout-DANTE-FLASH could be used to diagnose DVT. METHODS: Eleven healthy volunteers and 30 suspected DVT patients were recruited to undergo DANTE-FLASH and magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI). The suspected DVT patients were also examined by ultrasound (US). For the segment level, a total of 1,066 venous vessel segments were analyzed. Using US and MRDTI as the references, the sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), and accuracy (ACC) of DANTE-FLASH were calculated. To quantitatively compare image quality between DANTE-FLASH and MRDTI, image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), apparent contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between muscle and the venous lumen, and the apparent CNR between the thrombus and venous lumen were measured. Additionally, diagnostic confidence, image quality, and clot burden were also evaluated. RESULTS: Using the consensus results of US and MRDTI as a standard reference, the diagnostic SE, SP, PPV, NPV, and ACC of DANTE-FLASH for the 2 readers were 97.0% and 93.2%, 99.0% and 98.2%, 93.4% and 87.9%, 99.6% and 99.0%, and 98.8% and 97.6%, respectively. According to the image quantitative analysis results, DANTE-FLASH demonstrated higher image SNR and CNR than MRDTI. The image quality and diagnostic confidence scores of DANTE-FLASH were higher than MRDTI (3.66±0.44 vs. 3.52±0.52, P<0.001, and 3.84±0.36 vs. 3.76±0.41, P<0.001). There was excellent agreement between DANTE-FLASH and MRDTI on clot burden evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: DANTE-FLASH provided better image quality than MRDTI and accurately detected thrombi. It may, therefore, serve as a safe and convenient alternative for the diagnosis of DVT. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Black-blood thrombus imaging (BTI) has shown to be advantageous for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, previous techniques using fast spin echo have a high specific absorption rate. As DANTE (delay alternating with nutation for tailored excitation) black-blood preparation can suppress blood flows over a broad range of velocities, we hypothesized that a DANTE black-blood preparation combined with a fast low-angle shot (FLASH) gradient-echo readout-DANTE-FLASH could be used to diagnose DVT. METHODS: Eleven healthy volunteers and 30 suspected DVT patients were recruited to undergo DANTE-FLASH and magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI). The suspected DVT patients were also examined by ultrasound (US). For the segment level, a total of 1,066 venous vessel segments were analyzed. Using US and MRDTI as the references, the sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), and accuracy (ACC) of DANTE-FLASH were calculated. To quantitatively compare image quality between DANTE-FLASH and MRDTI, image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), apparent contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between muscle and the venous lumen, and the apparent CNR between the thrombus and venous lumen were measured. Additionally, diagnostic confidence, image quality, and clot burden were also evaluated. RESULTS: Using the consensus results of US and MRDTI as a standard reference, the diagnostic SE, SP, PPV, NPV, and ACC of DANTE-FLASH for the 2 readers were 97.0% and 93.2%, 99.0% and 98.2%, 93.4% and 87.9%, 99.6% and 99.0%, and 98.8% and 97.6%, respectively. According to the image quantitative analysis results, DANTE-FLASH demonstrated higher image SNR and CNR than MRDTI. The image quality and diagnostic confidence scores of DANTE-FLASH were higher than MRDTI (3.66±0.44 vs. 3.52±0.52, P<0.001, and 3.84±0.36 vs. 3.76±0.41, P<0.001). There was excellent agreement between DANTE-FLASH and MRDTI on clot burden evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: DANTE-FLASH provided better image quality than MRDTI and accurately detected thrombi. It may, therefore, serve as a safe and convenient alternative for the diagnosis of DVT. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT); magnetic resonance imaging; thrombus
Authors: Elizabeth A Sadowski; Lindsey K Bennett; Micah R Chan; Andrew L Wentland; Andrea L Garrett; Robert W Garrett; Arjang Djamali Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-01-31 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Clinton D Protack; Andrew M Bakken; Nikhil Patel; Wael E Saad; David L Waldman; Mark G Davies Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.268