Literature DB >> 33389504

Does the use of video improve patient satisfaction in the consent process for local-anaesthetic urological procedures?

Allison L Moore1, Justin B Howlett2, Manraj K Phull3, Lukhona L Mpungose4, Sebastian R Samson4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess patient satisfaction with the use of portable video media (PVM) for the purpose of taking informed consent for common urological outpatient procedures performed under local anaesthesia.
METHODS: Patients undergoing the following procedures were approached for recruitment: flexible cystoscopy with or without biopsy, transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy or flexible cystoscopy with insertion or removal of a ureteric stent. Audio-visual media were developed for each procedure, with each script translated from English into isiXhosa and Afrikaans. The study involved a cross-over for each patient between standard verbal consent (SVC) and PVM consent, with each patient randomised to start with SVC or PVM consent. Each of these consent arms was assessed via a questionnaire.
RESULTS: Sixty patients completed participation, with PVM as the first exposure for 28 patients and 32 patients receiving SVC as their first arm of the study. When comparing the overall satisfaction between SVC and PVM consent (the total scores out of 18 for the questionnaire), patients scored significantly higher for PVM consent (M = 16.3 ± 2.4) compared to SVC (M = 15.4 ± 2.9) (p = 0.002). 92% of the total patient sample preferred PVM consent.
CONCLUSION: Portable video media proved superior to SVC in improving satisfaction in the consent process for common outpatient urological procedures performed under local anaesthesia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Informed consent; Patient satisfaction; Video media

Year:  2021        PMID: 33389504     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02770-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  14 in total

1.  'It would be nice if they could give us more language'--serving South Africa's multilingual patient base.

Authors:  Ana Deumert
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale.

Authors:  D L Larsen; C C Attkisson; W A Hargreaves; T D Nguyen
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  1979

3.  Informed consent: recall by patients tested postoperatively.

Authors:  G Robinson; A Merav
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Informed consent: an evaluation of patients' understanding and opinion (with respect to the operation of transurethral resection of prostate).

Authors:  K C Saw; A M Wood; K Murphy; J R Parry; W G Hartfall
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  The use of portable video media vs standard verbal communication in the urological consent process: a multicentre, randomised controlled, crossover trial.

Authors:  Matthew Winter; Jonathan Kam; Sunny Nalavenkata; Ellen Hardy; Marcus Handmer; Hannah Ainsworth; Wai Gin Lee; Mark Louie-Johnsun
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Informed consent comprehension among vulnerable populations in Ecuador: video-delivered vs. in-person standard method.

Authors:  Ana Quevedo; Cecilia Condo; Gilda Valenzuela; Lucy Molina; Eduardo Castillo; Ana Palacio; Denisse Pareja; Guillermo Prado; Yannine Estrada; Maria Rosa Velazquez; Leonardo Tamariz
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Communication variables in the design of pre-surgical preparatory information.

Authors:  L M Wallace
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1986-05

8.  Video consent: a pilot study of informed consent in laparoscopic urology and its impact on patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Arun Sahai; Rajesh Kucheria; Ben Challacombe; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Decision Aids for Prostate Cancer Screening Choice: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jarno M Riikonen; Gordon H Guyatt; Tuomas P Kilpeläinen; Samantha Craigie; Arnav Agarwal; Thomas Agoritsas; Rachel Couban; Philipp Dahm; Petrus Järvinen; Victor Montori; Nicholas Power; Patrick O Richard; Jarno Rutanen; Henrikki Santti; Thomas Tailly; Philippe D Violette; Qi Zhou; Kari A O Tikkinen
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  A multimedia consent tool for research participants in the Gambia: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Muhammed Olanrewaju Afolabi; Nuala McGrath; Umberto D'Alessandro; Beate Kampmann; Egeruan B Imoukhuede; Raffaella M Ravinetto; Neal Alexander; Heidi J Larson; Daniel Chandramohan; Kalifa Bojang
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 9.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.