Literature DB >> 27440499

The use of portable video media vs standard verbal communication in the urological consent process: a multicentre, randomised controlled, crossover trial.

Matthew Winter1,2, Jonathan Kam3, Sunny Nalavenkata4, Ellen Hardy3, Marcus Handmer3, Hannah Ainsworth3, Wai Gin Lee3, Mark Louie-Johnsun3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine if portable video media (PVM) improves patient's knowledge and satisfaction acquired during the consent process for cystoscopy and insertion of a ureteric stent compared to standard verbal communication (SVC), as informed consent is a crucial component of patient care and PVM is an emerging technology that may help improve the consent process. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multi-centre randomised controlled crossover trial, patients requiring cystoscopy and stent insertion were recruited from two major teaching hospitals in Australia over a 15-month period (July 2014-December 2015). Patient information delivery was via PVM and SVC. The PVM consisted of an audio-visual presentation with cartoon animation presented on an iPad. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the validated Client Satisfaction Questionnaire 8 (CSQ-8; maximum score 32) and knowledge was tested using a true/false questionnaire (maximum score 28). Questionnaires were completed after first intervention and after crossover. Scores were analysed using the independent samples t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the crossover analysis.
RESULTS: In all, 88 patients were recruited. A significant 3.1 point (15.5%) increase in understanding was demonstrable favouring the use of PVM (P < 0.001). There was no difference in patient satisfaction between the groups as judged by the CSQ-8. A significant 3.6 point (17.8%) increase in knowledge score was seen when the SVC group were crossed over to the PVM arm. A total of 80.7% of patients preferred PVM and 19.3% preferred SVC. Limitations include the lack of a validated questionnaire to test knowledge acquired from the interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates patients' preference towards PVM in the urological consent process of cystoscopy and ureteric stent insertion. PVM improves patient's understanding compared with SVC and is a more effective means of content delivery to patients in terms of overall preference and knowledge gained during the consent process.
© 2016 The Authors BJU International © 2016 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  informed consent; multimedia; patient education; portable video media

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27440499     DOI: 10.1111/bju.13595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  9 in total

1.  Use of an iPad™ application in preoperative counseling for pelvic reconstructive surgery: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Casey L Kinman; Kate V Meriwether; Cayse M Powell; Deslyn T G Hobson; Jeremy T Gaskins; Sean L Francis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Does the use of video improve patient satisfaction in the consent process for local-anaesthetic urological procedures?

Authors:  Allison L Moore; Justin B Howlett; Manraj K Phull; Lukhona L Mpungose; Sebastian R Samson
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Fertility patients' use and perceptions of online fertility educational material.

Authors:  Claire Ann Jones; Chaula Mehta; Rhonda Zwingerman; Kimberly E Liu
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2020-07-18

4.  Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Johanna Glaser; Sarah Nouri; Alicia Fernandez; Rebecca L Sudore; Dean Schillinger; Michele Klein-Fedyshin; Yael Schenker
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Enhancing the Informed Consent Process Using Shared Decision Making and Consent Refusal Data from the CLEAR III Trial.

Authors:  Amanda L Porter; James Ebot; Karen Lane; Lesia H Mooney; Amy M Lannen; Eugene M Richie; Rachel Dlugash; Steve Mayo; Thomas G Brott; Wendy Ziai; William D Freeman; Daniel F Hanley
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Oxford Video Informed Consent Tool (OxVIC): a pilot study of informed video consent in spinal surgery and preoperative patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Gerard Mawhinney; Chrishan Thakar; Victoria Williamson; Dominique A Rothenfluh; Jeremy Reynolds
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  A test of positive suggestions about side effects as a way of enhancing the analgesic response to NSAIDs.

Authors:  Aurore Fernandez; Irving Kirsch; Louis Noël; Pierre Yves Rodondi; Ted J Kaptchuk; Marc R Suter; Isabelle Décosterd; Chantal Berna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Pot Ignored Boils On: Sustained Calls for Explicit Consent of Intimate Medical Exams.

Authors:  Lori Bruce
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2020-06

9.  Lumbar puncture patient video increases knowledge and reduces uncertainty: An RCT.

Authors:  Rosha Babapour Mofrad; Agnetha D Fruijtier; Leonie N C Visser; Nina Hoogland; Maisa van Dijk; Frederique van Rossum; Femke H Bouwman; Ellen M A Smets; Charlotte E Teunissen; Wiesje M van der Flier
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2021-02-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.