| Literature DB >> 29717898 |
Ana Quevedo1, Cecilia Condo1, Gilda Valenzuela1, Lucy Molina1, Eduardo Castillo1, Ana Palacio2,3, Denisse Pareja1,3, Guillermo Prado4, Yannine Estrada4, Maria Rosa Velazquez4, Leonardo Tamariz2,3.
Abstract
The informed consent comprehension process is key to engaging potential research subject participation. The aim of this study is to compare informed consent comprehension between two methods: standard and video-delivered. We compared the in-person and video-delivered informed consent process in the Familias Unidas intervention. We evaluated comprehension using a 7-item true/false questionnaire. There were a total of 152 participants in the control group and 87 in the experimental. General characteristics were similar between both groups (p > 0.05). First-attempt informed consent comprehension was higher in the intervention group but was not statistically significant (80% and 78% respectively p = 0.44). A video-delivered informed consent process did not differ from the standard method of informed consent in a low educational and socioeconomic environment.Entities:
Keywords: General medicine/internal medicine; informed consent; low health literacy; low literacy; research ethics; telehealth
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29717898 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1470931
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Account Res ISSN: 0898-9621 Impact factor: 2.622