Literature DB >> 3338943

Dynamics of invasive pressure monitoring systems: clinical and laboratory evaluation.

N C Gibbs1, R M Gardner.   

Abstract

Seven pressure monitoring systems were evaluated in the clinical setting and in the laboratory to assess their adequacy for recording invasive blood pressures. We found that a large number of systems used in the clinical setting gave erroneous pressure results because of inadequate dynamic response. Results of testing similar systems in the clinical setting and under optimal laboratory conditions differed greatly. Four major findings were made: (1) Air bubbles in the monitoring systems near the transducer accounted for most of the variability of the dynamic characteristics of systems in the clinical setting; (2) simple catheter transducer system setups performed better, suggesting that simple "kits" be used; (3) membrane domes perform adequately if they are attached with care and according to the manufacturer's specifications; and (4) extension tubing was detrimental to the dynamic response of all systems, especially for pulmonary artery catheters. Fast-flush testing of pressure monitoring systems is needed to ensure the adequacy of dynamic response characteristics in the clinical setting. If the fast-flush characteristics are inadequate, physicians and nurses have the opportunity to troubleshoot the system and remove air bubbles and excessive tubing and to properly attach the transducer domes until optimal characteristics are obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3338943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung        ISSN: 0147-9563            Impact factor:   2.210


  5 in total

1.  Dynamic response of a neonatal catheter-manometer system in situ.

Authors:  H van Langen; P Brienesse; K Kopinga; P Wijn
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1993-11

2.  Assessment of left ventricular function by pulse wave analysis in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Sabino Scolletta; Laurent Bodson; Katia Donadello; Fabio S Taccone; Alessandro Devigili; Jean-Louis Vincent; Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Alveolar bone measurement precision for phosphor-plate images.

Authors:  Charles F Hildebolt; Rex Couture; Nathalia M Garcia; Debra Dixon; D Doug Miley; William Shannon; Cheryl Mueller; Eric Langenwalter; Cathy Anderson Spearie; R Civitelli
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2009-09

4.  Comparison of intraarterial with continuous noninvasive blood pressure measurement in postoperative pediatric patients.

Authors:  J K Triedman; J P Saul
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1994-01

5.  On the dynamic performance of the Abbott Safeset blood-conserving arterial line system.

Authors:  R P Woda; R Dzwonczyk; C Buyama; B L Bernacki; W B Kelly
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.502

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.