Jeremy LaMothe1,2, Josh R Baxter2,3, Susannah Gilbert4, Conor I Murphy2,5, Sydney C Karnovsky2, Mark C Drakos6. 1. 1 Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, Health Sciences Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 2. 2 Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA. 3. 3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 4. 4 Department of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA. 5. 5 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 6. 6 Foot and Ankle Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Syndesmotic injuries can be associated with poor patient outcomes and posttraumatic ankle arthritis, particularly in the case of malreduction. However, ankle joint contact mechanics following a syndesmotic injury and reduction remains poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to characterize the effects of a syndesmotic injury and reduction techniques on ankle joint contact mechanics in a biomechanical model. METHODS: Ten cadaveric whole lower leg specimens with undisturbed proximal tibiofibular joints were prepared and tested in this study. Contact area, contact force, and peak contact pressure were measured in the ankle joint during simulated standing in the intact, injured, and 3 reduction conditions: screw fixation with a clamp, screw fixation without a clamp (thumb technique), and a suture-button construct. Differences in these ankle contact parameters were detected between conditions using repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Syndesmotic disruption decreased tibial plafond contact area and force. Syndesmotic reduction did not restore ankle loading mechanics to values measured in the intact condition. Reduction with the thumb technique was able to restore significantly more joint contact area and force than the reduction clamp or suture-button construct. CONCLUSION: Syndesmotic disruption decreased joint contact area and force. Although the thumb technique performed significantly better than the reduction clamp and suture-button construct, syndesmotic reduction did not restore contact mechanics to intact levels. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Decreased contact area and force with disruption imply that other structures are likely receiving more loads (eg, medial and lateral gutters), which may have clinical implications such as the development of posttraumatic arthritis.
BACKGROUND: Syndesmotic injuries can be associated with poor patient outcomes and posttraumatic ankle arthritis, particularly in the case of malreduction. However, ankle joint contact mechanics following a syndesmotic injury and reduction remains poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to characterize the effects of a syndesmotic injury and reduction techniques on ankle joint contact mechanics in a biomechanical model. METHODS: Ten cadaveric whole lower leg specimens with undisturbed proximal tibiofibular joints were prepared and tested in this study. Contact area, contact force, and peak contact pressure were measured in the ankle joint during simulated standing in the intact, injured, and 3 reduction conditions: screw fixation with a clamp, screw fixation without a clamp (thumb technique), and a suture-button construct. Differences in these ankle contact parameters were detected between conditions using repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Syndesmotic disruption decreased tibial plafond contact area and force. Syndesmotic reduction did not restore ankle loading mechanics to values measured in the intact condition. Reduction with the thumb technique was able to restore significantly more joint contact area and force than the reduction clamp or suture-button construct. CONCLUSION: Syndesmotic disruption decreased joint contact area and force. Although the thumb technique performed significantly better than the reduction clamp and suture-button construct, syndesmotic reduction did not restore contact mechanics to intact levels. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Decreased contact area and force with disruption imply that other structures are likely receiving more loads (eg, medial and lateral gutters), which may have clinical implications such as the development of posttraumatic arthritis.
Authors: Bennet A Butler; Eric C Hempen; Mauricio Barbosa; Muturi Muriuki; Robert M Havey; Richard W Nicolay; Anish R Kadakia Journal: J Orthop Date: 2019-06-04
Authors: Andres Eduardo O'Daly; R Timothy Kreulen; Sorawut Thamyongkit; Alfred Pisano; Kitchai Luksameearunothai; Erik A Hasenboehler; Melvin D Helgeson; Babar Shafiq Journal: Foot Ankle Orthop Date: 2020-11-23
Authors: Murray T Wong; Charmaine Wiens; Jeremy Lamothe; W Brent Edwards; Prism S Schneider Journal: Foot Ankle Int Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 2.827