Literature DB >> 33387647

A phylogeny for the Drosophila montium species group: A model clade for comparative analyses.

William R Conner1, Emily K Delaney2, Michael J Bronski3, Paul S Ginsberg4, Timothy B Wheeler5, Kelly M Richardson6, Brooke Peckenpaugh7, Kevin J Kim2, Masayoshi Watada8, Ary A Hoffmann6, Michael B Eisen3, Artyom Kopp2, Brandon S Cooper5, Michael Turelli9.   

Abstract

The Drosophila montium species group is a clade of 94 named species, closely related to the model species D. melanogaster. The montium species group is distributed over a broad geographic range throughout Asia, Africa, and Australasia. Species of this group possess a wide range of morphologies, mating behaviors, and endosymbiont associations, making this clade useful for comparative analyses. We use genomic data from 42 available species to estimate the phylogeny and relative divergence times within the montium species group, and its relative divergence time from D. melanogaster. To assess the robustness of our phylogenetic inferences, we use 3 non-overlapping sets of 20 single-copy coding sequences and analyze all 60 genes with both Bayesian and maximum likelihood methods. Our analyses support monophyly of the group. Apart from the uncertain placement of a single species, D. baimaii, our analyses also support the monophyly of all seven subgroups proposed within the montium group. Our phylograms and relative chronograms provide a highly resolved species tree, with discordance restricted to estimates of relatively short branches deep in the tree. In contrast, age estimates for the montium crown group, relative to its divergence from D. melanogaster, depend critically on prior assumptions concerning variation in rates of molecular evolution across branches, and hence have not been reliably determined. We discuss methodological issues that limit phylogenetic resolution - even when complete genome sequences are available - as well as the utility of the current phylogeny for understanding the evolutionary and biogeographic history of this clade.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian inference; Biogeography; Chronograms; Drosophila phylogeny; Maximum likelihood inference; Phylogenetic discordance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33387647      PMCID: PMC7946709          DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2020.107061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  85 in total

1.  Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization.

Authors:  Loren H Rieseberg; Olivier Raymond; David M Rosenthal; Zhao Lai; Kevin Livingstone; Takuya Nakazato; Jennifer L Durphy; Andrea E Schwarzbach; Lisa A Donovan; Christian Lexer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Improving marginal likelihood estimation for Bayesian phylogenetic model selection.

Authors:  Wangang Xie; Paul O Lewis; Yu Fan; Lynn Kuo; Ming-Hui Chen
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Frequentist properties of Bayesian posterior probabilities of phylogenetic trees under simple and complex substitution models.

Authors:  John Huelsenbeck; Bruce Rannala
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Wolbachia Acquisition by Drosophila yakuba-Clade Hosts and Transfer of Incompatibility Loci Between Distantly Related Wolbachia.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Dan Vanderpool; William R Conner; Daniel R Matute; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Rapid evolutionary rewiring of a structurally constrained eye enhancer.

Authors:  Christina I Swanson; David B Schwimmer; Scott Barolo
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  An examination of the constancy of the rate of molecular evolution.

Authors:  C H Langley; W M Fitch
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Rapid Global Spread of wRi-like Wolbachia across Multiple Drosophila.

Authors:  Michael Turelli; Brandon S Cooper; Kelly M Richardson; Paul S Ginsberg; Brooke Peckenpaugh; Chenling X Antelope; Kevin J Kim; Michael R May; Antoine Abrieux; Derek A Wilson; Michael J Bronski; Brian R Moore; Jian-Jun Gao; Michael B Eisen; Joanna C Chiu; William R Conner; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Temporal patterns of fruit fly (Drosophila) evolution revealed by mutation clocks.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Sankar Subramanian; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Estimating divergence dates and substitution rates in the Drosophila phylogeny.

Authors:  Darren J Obbard; John Maclennan; Kang-Wook Kim; Andrew Rambaut; Patrick M O'Grady; Francis M Jiggins
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  ABySS 2.0: resource-efficient assembly of large genomes using a Bloom filter.

Authors:  Shaun D Jackman; Benjamin P Vandervalk; Hamid Mohamadi; Justin Chu; Sarah Yeo; S Austin Hammond; Golnaz Jahesh; Hamza Khan; Lauren Coombe; Rene L Warren; Inanc Birol
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  4 in total

1.  Using Species Groups to Approach the Large and Taxonomically Unresolved Freshwater Fish Family Nemacheilidae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes).

Authors:  Tomáš Dvořák; Vendula Šlechtová; Jörg Bohlen
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-22

2.  Phylogenomic analyses of the genus Drosophila reveals genomic signals of climate adaptation.

Authors:  Fang Li; Rahul V Rane; Victor Luria; Zijun Xiong; Jiawei Chen; Zimai Li; Renee A Catullo; Philippa C Griffin; Michele Schiffer; Stephen Pearce; Siu Fai Lee; Kerensa McElroy; Ann Stocker; Jennifer Shirriffs; Fiona Cockerell; Chris Coppin; Carla M Sgrò; Amir Karger; John W Cain; Jessica A Weber; Gabriel Santpere; Marc W Kirschner; Ary A Hoffmann; John G Oakeshott; Guojie Zhang
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 8.678

3.  cifB-transcript levels largely explain cytoplasmic incompatibility variation across divergent Wolbachia.

Authors:  J Dylan Shropshire; Emily Hamant; William R Conner; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  PNAS Nexus       Date:  2022-06-28

4.  Phylogenetic resolution of the fly superfamily Ephydroidea-Molecular systematics of the enigmatic and diverse relatives of Drosophilidae.

Authors:  Isaac S Winkler; Ashley H Kirk-Spriggs; Keith M Bayless; John Soghigian; Rudolf Meier; Thomas Pape; David K Yeates; A Bernardo Carvalho; Robert S Copeland; Brian M Wiegmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.