Literature DB >> 12099485

Under what conditions is recognition spared relative to recall after selective hippocampal damage in humans?

J S Holdstock1, A R Mayes, N Roberts, E Cezayirli, C L Isaac, R C O'Reilly, K A Norman.   

Abstract

The claim that recognition memory is spared relative to recall after focal hippocampal damage has been disputed in the literature. We examined this claim by investigating object and object-location recall and recognition memory in a patient, YR, who has adult-onset selective hippocampal damage. Our aim was to identify the conditions under which recognition was spared relative to recall in this patient. She showed unimpaired forced-choice object recognition but clearly impaired recall, even when her control subjects found the object recognition task to be numerically harder than the object recall task. However, on two other recognition tests, YR's performance was not relatively spared. First, she was clearly impaired at an equivalently difficult yes/no object recognition task, but only when targets and foils were very similar. Second, YR was clearly impaired at forced-choice recognition of object-location associations. This impairment was also unrelated to difficulty because this task was no more difficult than the forced-choice object recognition task for control subjects. The clear impairment of yes/no, but not of forced-choice, object recognition after focal hippocampal damage, when targets and foils are very similar, is predicted by the neural network-based Complementary Learning Systems model of recognition. This model postulates that recognition is mediated by hippocampally dependent recollection and cortically dependent familiarity; thus hippocampal damage should not impair item familiarity. The model postulates that familiarity is ineffective when very similar targets and foils are shown one at a time and subjects have to identify which items are old (yes/no recognition). In contrast, familiarity is effective in discriminating which of similar targets and foils, seen together, is old (forced-choice recognition). Independent evidence from the remember/know procedure also indicates that YR's familiarity is normal. The Complementary Learning Systems model can also accommodate the clear impairment of forced-choice object-location recognition memory if it incorporates the view that the most complete convergence of spatial and object information, represented in different cortical regions, occurs in the hippocampus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12099485     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.10011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  74 in total

1.  Multiple routes to memory: distinct medial temporal lobe processes build item and source memories.

Authors:  Lila Davachi; Jason P Mitchell; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Spatial memory, recognition memory, and the hippocampus.

Authors:  Nicola J Broadbent; Larry R Squire; Robert E Clark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Pattern separation deficits following damage to the hippocampus.

Authors:  C Brock Kirwan; Andrew Hartshorn; Shauna M Stark; Naomi J Goodrich-Hunsaker; Ramona O Hopkins; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  A medial temporal lobe division of labor: insights from memory in aging and early Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  David A Wolk; Kathryn L Dunfee; Bradford C Dickerson; Howard J Aizenstein; Steven T DeKosky
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.899

5.  Teasing apart tangrams: testing hippocampal pattern separation with a collaborative referencing paradigm.

Authors:  Melissa C Duff; David E Warren; Rupa Gupta; Juan Pablo Benabe Vidal; Daniel Tranel; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  Specific responses of human hippocampal neurons are associated with better memory.

Authors:  Nanthia A Suthana; Neelroop N Parikshak; Arne D Ekstrom; Matias J Ison; Barbara J Knowlton; Susan Y Bookheimer; Itzhak Fried
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Attention promotes episodic encoding by stabilizing hippocampal representations.

Authors:  Mariam Aly; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Functional neuroanatomy of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory: a unified account based on multiple trace theory.

Authors:  Morris Moscovitch; R Shayna Rosenbaum; Asaf Gilboa; Donna Rose Addis; Robyn Westmacott; Cheryl Grady; Mary Pat McAndrews; Brian Levine; Sandra Black; Gordon Winocur; Lynn Nadel
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Electrolytic lesions of the dorsal hippocampus disrupt renewal of conditional fear after extinction.

Authors:  Jinzhao Ji; Stephen Maren
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Yes/no versus forced-choice recognition memory in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: patterns of impairment and associations with dementia severity.

Authors:  Lindsay R Clark; Nikki H Stricker; David J Libon; Lisa Delano-Wood; David P Salmon; Dean C Delis; Mark W Bondi
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 3.535

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.