Literature DB >> 3338201

Mechanical testing of spinal instrumentation.

R B Ashman1, J G Birch, L B Bone, J D Corin, J A Herring, C E Johnston, J F Ritterbush, J W Roach.   

Abstract

Clinically, implant failure is often the result of fatigue from continuous cyclic loading. Because of the inadequacies of long-run cyclic testing, fatigue susceptibility of implants was investigated by means of strain measurements and stress analysis under physiologic loads. The implants were equipped with strain gauges during load-deformation testing, and the tensile stress (the component of stress-producing fatigue failure in metals) was calculated for that site on the implant. For metals most often implanted for spinal surgery, such as stainless steel and chrome-cobalt alloys, a stress exists, known as the endurance limit, below which failure will not occur, even if cycled indefinitely. By calculating the tensile stresses in an implant and relating them to the endurance limit, the implant's susceptibility to fatigue can be determined at the site of stress analysis without formal cyclic load testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3338201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  11 in total

1.  Load-displacement properties of the thoracolumbar calf spine: experimental results and comparison to known human data.

Authors:  H J Wilke; S T Krischak; K H Wenger; L E Claes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical testing of three newly developed transpedicular multisegmental fixation systems.

Authors:  S Eggli; F Schläpfer; M Angst; P Witschger; M Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Compliance of the L5-S1 spinal unit: a comparative study between an unconstrained and a partially constrained system.

Authors:  E A Charriere; T Beutler; M Caride; P Mordasini; T E Orr; P K Zysset
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Increased rod stiffness improves the degree of deformity correction by segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Kasim Abul-Kasim; Magnus K Karlsson; Acke Ohlin
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2011-07-28

5.  Mechanical Analysis of 3 Posterior Fusion Assemblies Intended to Cross the Cervicothoracic Junction.

Authors:  John T Sherrill; David B Bumpass; Erin M Mannen
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 1.723

6.  Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in the treatment of unstable thoracic and lumbar spine fractures.

Authors:  I T Benli; N R Tandoğan; M Kiş; M Tuzuner; E F Mumcu; S Akalin; M Citak
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  CDH: preliminary report on a new anterior spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  A Hopf; P Eysel; J Dubousset
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Correction manoeuvres in the surgical treatment of spinal deformities.

Authors:  Alpaslan Senkoylu; Mehmet Cetinkaya
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-05-11

9.  Risk factors for rod fracture after posterior correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy: a retrospective case-series.

Authors:  Cameron Barton; Andriy Noshchenko; Vikas Patel; Christopher Cain; Christopher Kleck; Evalina Burger
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-11-04

10.  Stacking-fault strengthening of biomedical Co-Cr-Mo alloy via multipass thermomechanical processing.

Authors:  Kenta Yamanaka; Manami Mori; Shigeo Sato; Akihiko Chiba
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.