Literature DB >> 33382008

Development of an Intraoperative Pipeline for Holographic Mixed Reality Visualization During Spinal Fusion Surgery.

Vivek P Buch1, Kobina G Mensah-Brown1, James W Germi1, Brian J Park2, Peter J Madsen1, Austin J Borja1, Debanjan Haldar1, Patricia Basenfelder1, Jang W Yoon1, James M Schuster1, Han-Chiao I Chen1.   

Abstract

Objective. Holographic mixed reality (HMR) allows for the superimposition of computer-generated virtual objects onto the operator's view of the world. Innovative solutions can be developed to enable the use of this technology during surgery. The authors developed and iteratively optimized a pipeline to construct, visualize, and register intraoperative holographic models of patient landmarks during spinal fusion surgery. Methods. The study was carried out in two phases. In phase 1, the custom intraoperative pipeline to generate patient-specific holographic models was developed over 7 patients. In phase 2, registration accuracy was optimized iteratively for 6 patients in a real-time operative setting. Results. In phase 1, an intraoperative pipeline was successfully employed to generate and deploy patient-specific holographic models. In phase 2, the registration error with the native hand-gesture registration was 20.2 ± 10.8 mm (n = 7 test points). Custom controller-based registration significantly reduced the mean registration error to 4.18 ± 2.83 mm (n = 24 test points, P < .01). Accuracy improved over time (B = -.69, P < .0001) with the final patient achieving a registration error of 2.30 ± .58 mm. Across both phases, the average model generation time was 18.0 ± 6.1 minutes (n = 6) for isolated spinal hardware and 33.8 ± 8.6 minutes (n = 6) for spinal anatomy. Conclusions. A custom pipeline is described for the generation of intraoperative 3D holographic models during spine surgery. Registration accuracy dramatically improved with iterative optimization of the pipeline and technique. While significant improvements and advancements need to be made to enable clinical utility, HMR demonstrates significant potential as the next frontier of intraoperative visualization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D visualization; HoloLens™; augmented reality; holographic mixed reality; spine surgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 33382008      PMCID: PMC8243385          DOI: 10.1177/1553350620984339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Innov        ISSN: 1553-3506            Impact factor:   2.058


  18 in total

1.  Minimally Invasive Unilateral Percutaneous Transfracture Fixation of a Hangman's Fracture Using Neuronavigation and Intraoperative Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Mohamed A R Soliman; Benjamin Y M Kwan; Balraj S Jhawar
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Augmented reality-assisted pedicle screw insertion: a cadaveric proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Camilo A Molina; Nicholas Theodore; A Karim Ahmed; Erick M Westbroek; Yigal Mirovsky; Ran Harel; Emanuele Orru'; Majid Khan; Timothy Witham; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2019-03-29

3.  Technical Feasibility and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Nerve Block With Assistance of a Wearable Head-up Display.

Authors:  Jang W Yoon; Kent Richter; Tito Vivas-Buitrago; Esther J Kim; Robert E Chen; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Jose L Diaz-Gomez; Steven R Clendenen
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 6.288

4.  Technical feasibility and safety of an intraoperative head-up display device during spine instrumentation.

Authors:  Jang W Yoon; Robert E Chen; Phillip K Han; Phong Si; William D Freeman; Stephen M Pirris
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 2.547

5.  Augmented reality-guided neurosurgery: accuracy and intraoperative application of an image projection technique.

Authors:  Leila Besharati Tabrizi; Mehran Mahvash
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 6.  Robotics in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Matthew S Galetta; Joseph D Leider; Srikanth N Divi; Dhruv K C Goyal; Gregory D Schroeder
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

7.  Real-time Video-Streaming to Surgical Loupe Mounted Head-Up Display for Navigated Meningioma Resection.

Authors:  Roberto Diaz; Jang Yoon; Robert Chen; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Robert Wharen; Ricardo Komotar
Journal:  Turk Neurosurg       Date:  2017-04-30       Impact factor: 1.003

8.  Clinical Accuracy of Holographic Navigation Using Point-Based Registration on Augmented-Reality Glasses.

Authors:  Tristan P C van Doormaal; Jesse A M van Doormaal; Tom Mensink
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.703

9.  The use of intraoperative computed tomography navigation in pituitary surgery promises a better intraoperative orientation in special cases.

Authors:  Stefan Linsler; Sebastian Antes; Sebastian Senger; Joachim Oertel
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

Review 10.  Recent Development of Augmented Reality in Surgery: A Review.

Authors:  P Vávra; J Roman; P Zonča; P Ihnát; M Němec; J Kumar; N Habib; A El-Gendi
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.682

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Intra-operative wearable visualization in spine surgery: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Hasan S Ahmad; Jang W Yoon
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-03

Review 2.  Spine Surgery Assisted by Augmented Reality: Where Have We Been?

Authors:  Yanting Liu; Min-Gi Lee; Jin-Sung Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 3.  Visualization, navigation, augmentation. The ever-changing perspective of the neurosurgeon.

Authors:  A Boaro; F Moscolo; A Feletti; G M V Polizzi; S Nunes; F Siddi; M L D Broekman; F Sala
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-08-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.