Literature DB >> 33381586

Learning Curve and Clinical Outcome of Biportal Endoscopic-Assisted Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Ju-Eun Kim1, Hyun-Seung Yoo2, Dae-Jung Choi1, Jin-Ho Hwang1, Eugene J Park3, Seungho Chung3.   

Abstract

Interbody fusion is a common surgical technique for diseases of the lumbar spine. Biportal endoscopic-assisted lumbar interbody fusion (BE-LIF) is a novel minimally invasive technique that has a long learning curve, which can be a barrier for surgeons. Therefore, we analyzed the learning curve in terms of operative time and evaluated the outcomes of BE-LIF. A retrospective study of fifty-seven consecutive patients who underwent BE-LIF for degenerative lumbar disease by a single surgeon from January 2017 to December 2018 was performed. Fifty patients underwent a single-level procedure, and 7 underwent surgery at two levels. The mean follow-up period was 24 months (range, 14-38). Total operative time, postoperative drainage volume, time to ambulation, and complications were analyzed. Clinical outcome was measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for back and leg pain, and modified Macnab criteria. The learning curve was evaluated by a nonparametric regression locally weighted scatterplot smoothing curve. Cases before the stable point on the curve were designated as group A, and those after the stable point were designated group B. Operative time decreased as the number of cases increased. A stable point was noticed on the 400th day and the 34th case after the first BE-LIF was performed. All cases showed improved ODI and VAS scores at the final follow-up. Overall mean operative time was 171.74 ± 35.1 min. Mean operative time was significantly lower in group B (139.7 ± 11.6 min) compared to group A (193.4 ± 28.3 min). Time to ambulation was significantly lower in group B compared to group A. VAS and ODI scores did not differ between the two groups. BE-LIF is an effective minimally invasive technique for lumbar degenerative disease. In our case series, this technique required approximately 34 cases to reach an adequate performance level.
Copyright © 2020 Ju-Eun Kim et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33381586      PMCID: PMC7762649          DOI: 10.1155/2020/8815432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


  30 in total

1.  Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Yue Zhou; Zheng Feng Zhang; Chang Qing Li; Wen Jie Zheng; Jie Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach.

Authors:  ShunWu Fan; ZhiJun Hu; FengDong Zhao; Xing Zhao; Yue Huang; Xiangqian Fang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Jae Chul Lee; Hae-Dong Jang; Byung-Joon Shin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal endoscopic discectomy-assisted oblique lumbar interbody fusion: preliminary results.

Authors:  Dong Hwa Heo; Jin-Sung Kim
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.047

5.  Learning curve and complications of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Pedro S Silva; Paulo Pereira; Pedro Monteiro; Pedro A Silva; Rui Vaz
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life.

Authors:  Owoicho Adogwa; Scott L Parker; Ali Bydon; Joseph Cheng; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2011-12

7.  Clinical and radiological outcomes between biportal endoscopic decompression and microscopic decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Woo-Kie Min; Ju-Eun Kim; Dae-Jung Choi; Eugene J Park; Jeong Heo
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 1.601

8.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results.

Authors:  James D Schwender; Langston T Holly; David P Rouben; Kevin T Foley
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-02

9.  Back pain and disability after lumbar laminectomy: is there a relationship to muscle retraction?

Authors:  Gorav Datta; Kanna K Gnanalingham; David Peterson; Nigel Mendoza; Kevin O'Neill; James Van Dellen; Alison McGregor; Sean P F Hughes
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Ju-Eun Kim; Dae-Jung Choi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-05-18
View more
  4 in total

1.  Learning Curve and Complications of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy: Cumulative Sum and Risk-Adjusted Cumulative Sum Analysis.

Authors:  Jinchao Xu; Dong Wang; Jidan Liu; Chengyue Zhu; Jianhang Bao; Wenshuo Gao; Wei Zhang; Hao Pan
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-08-15

2.  Learning Curve and Initial Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Renchun Tan; Xin Lv; Pengfei Wu; Yawei Li; Yuliang Dai; Bin Jiang; Bolin Ren; Guohua Lv; Bing Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-28

3.  Physician-Related Variability in the Outcomes of an Invasive Treatment for Neck and Back Pain: A Multi-Level Analysis of Data Gathered in Routine Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ana Royuela; Francisco M Kovacs; Jesús Seco-Calvo; Borja M Fernández-Félix; Víctor Abraira; Javier Zamora
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Endoscopic Techniques for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Principles and Context.

Authors:  Bryan Zheng; Elias Shaaya; Josh Feler; Owen P Leary; Matthew J Hagan; Ankush Bajaj; Jared S Fridley; Frank Hassel; Raymond Gardocki; Ricardo Casal Grau; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Albert E Telfeian
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.