Literature DB >> 23905958

Learning curve and complications of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Pedro S Silva1, Paulo Pereira, Pedro Monteiro, Pedro A Silva, Rui Vaz.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) has the potential advantage of minimizing soft-tissue damage and reducing recovery time compared to open procedures. A steep learning curve has been described for the technique. The aim of the present study was to define the learning curve that describes the progress of a single surgeon performing the MI-TLIF.
METHODS: One hundred fifty consecutive patients with degenerative lumbar disease who underwent 1- or 2-level MI-TLIF were included in the study. Operative time, corrected operative time per level, and complications were analyzed. The learning curve was assessed using a negative exponential curve-fit regression analysis.
RESULTS: One hundred ten patients underwent 1-level and 18 patients underwent 2-level MI-TLIF; the remaining 22 underwent a single-level procedure plus an ancillary procedure (decompression at adjacent level, vertebral augmentation through fenestrated pedicle screws, interspinous device at adjacent level). Negative exponential curves appropriately described the relationship between operative time and experience for 1-level surgery and after correction of operative time per level (R(2) = 0.65 and 0.57). The median operative time was 140 minutes (interquartile range 120-173 minutes), and a 50% learning milestone was achieved at Case 12; a 90% learning milestone was achieved at Case 39. No patient required transfusion in the perioperative period. The overall complication rate was 12.67% and the most frequent complication was a dural tear (5.32%). Before the 50% and 90% learning milestones, the complication rates were 33% and 20.51%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The MI-TLIF is a reliable and effective option for lumbar arthrodesis. According to the present study, 90% of the learning curve can be achieved at around the 40th case.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23905958     DOI: 10.3171/2013.5.FOCUS13157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  22 in total

1.  Accuracy of minimally invasive percutaneous thoracolumbar pedicle screws using 2D fluoroscopy: a retrospective review through 3D CT analysis.

Authors:  Mark J Winder; Paul M Gilhooly
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

2.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable articulating interbody spacers significantly improves radiographic outcomes compared to static interbody spacers.

Authors:  Anthony J Russo; Steven A Schopler; Katelyn J Stetzner; Torrey Shirk
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09

Review 3.  Learning curve for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yong Ahn; Sol Lee; Woo-Kyung Kim; Sang-Gu Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.721

4.  [Comparative study of microendoscope-assisted and conventional minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases].

Authors:  Jianwen Dong; Yang Yang; Zihao Chen; Mingzhu Yu; Bin Liu; Qiyou Wang; Peigen Xie; Ruiqiang Chen; Limin Rong
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-07-15

5.  Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Isthmic Versus Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Dustin H Massel; Benjamin C Mayo; Grant D Shifflett; Daniel D Bohl; Philip K Louie; Bryce A Basques; William W Long; Krishna D Modi; Fady Y Hijji; Ankur S Narain; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-04-30

6.  True anteroposterior view pedicle screw insertion technique.

Authors:  Jia-Yue Bai; Wei Zhang; Ji-Long An; Ya-Peng Sun; Wen-Yuan Ding; Yong Shen
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Attractive Option for Select Failed Backs.

Authors:  Arvind G Kulkarni; Shashidhar Bangalore Kantharajanna; Abhilash N Dhruv
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-02-07

Review 8.  Lower complication and reoperation rates for laminectomy rather than MI TLIF/other fusions for degenerative lumbar disease/spondylolisthesis: A review.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-03-07

9.  Learning Curve and Clinical Outcomes of Performing Surgery with the InterTan Intramedullary Nail in Treating Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  A-Bing Li; Wei-Jiang Zhang; Ji-Qi Wang; You-Ming Zhao; Wei-Jun Guo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Radiation Exposure in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Effect of the Learning Curve.

Authors:  Abhishek Kumar; Robert K Merrill; Samuel C Overley; Dante M Leven; Joshua J Meaike; Avani Vaishnav; Catherine Gang; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.