Literature DB >> 3338012

DNA flow cytometry and prognostic factors in 1331 frozen breast cancer specimens.

L G Dressler1, L C Seamer, M A Owens, G M Clark, W L McGuire.   

Abstract

Breast cancer proliferative capacity as determined by the DNA thymidine labeling index, along with estrogen and progesterone receptor status, is highly predictive for risk of relapse and overall survival. Recently, DNA ploidy and proliferative capacity (S-phase fraction [SPF]) as determined by flow cytometry have also shown significant prognostic value. The authors have developed a technique which allows a 50 to 100 mg aliquot of the same frozen breast tumor specimen routinely employed in steroid receptor assays, to be assayed for both DNA ploidy and SPF by flow cytometry. Of the 1331 tumors examined, DNA histograms were evaluable for ploidy in 89% (1184) of specimens examined; 57% of these were aneuploid. Adapting a trapezoidal model to estimate SPF in both diploid and aneuploid tumors, the authors found 81% (1084) to be evaluable for SPF, with a median SPF of 5.8% for the entire population. The median SPF was significantly lower in diploid tumors (2.6%) than in aneuploid tumors (10.3%, P less than 0.0001). Both aneuploidy and high SPF were strongly associated with absence of steroid receptors. Aneuploid tumors showed more striking differences in the frequency of high S-phase values with respect to receptor status and age or menopausal status, whereas diploid but not aneuploid tumors showed lower SPF in node-negative versus node-positive patients. Because it is particularly important to identify the high-risk minority of node-negative patients, the authors examined the node-negative group separately. High SPF subgroups appeared in each category of receptor status and age or menopausal status within the node-negative group, suggesting that SPF will be an independent prognostic factor. With the DNA flow cytometric methods used here, it is now practical to determine ploidy and SPF for nearly every breast cancer patient. These factors, which show associations with established prognostic factors, such as receptor status can now be fully evaluated for their prognostic significance in broad patient populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3338012     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880201)61:3<420::aid-cncr2820610303>3.0.co;2-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  57 in total

1.  A rapid and optimization-free procedure allows the in vivo detection of subtle cell cycle and ploidy alterations in tissues by flow cytometry.

Authors:  Christina Heinlein; Wolfgang Deppert; Antony W Braithwaite; Daniel Speidel
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Flow Cytometric Analysis to Assess the Malignant Potential of Phyllodes Tumor.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1994-12-30       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 3.  Aneuploidy as a prognostic factor in breast cancer.

Authors:  A von Rosen
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1989

4.  Breast biopsy nuclear pellets are a convenient source of DNA for routine determination of Her-2/neu gene amplification.

Authors:  O Malka; Y Pollack; D Benharroch; Y Cohen; R Levy; I Yanai-Inbar; J Gopas
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Comparison of image analysis and flow cytometric determination of cellular DNA content.

Authors:  C Cope; D Rowe; L Delbridge; J Philips; M Friedlander
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Genome size, complexity, and ploidy of the pathogenic fungus Histoplasma capsulatum.

Authors:  J Carr; G Shearer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Characterization of brain and bone-metastasizing clones selected from an ethylnitrosourea-induced rat mammary carcinoma.

Authors:  D G Hall; G Stoica
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.150

8.  An immunohistological study of breast cancer--with special reference to the expression of carbohydrate antigens and estrogen receptor status.

Authors:  M Sowa; Y S Chung; Y Kato; M Nishimura; T Kubo; H Maekawa; Y Fujimoto; K Umeyama; M Kawahara
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1990-05

9.  Oncogene amplification in breast cancer.

Authors:  M Donovan-Peluso; A M Contento; H Tobon; B Ripepi; J Locker
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Mechanism of chemoresistance mediated by miR-140 in human osteosarcoma and colon cancer cells.

Authors:  B Song; Y Wang; Y Xi; K Kudo; S Bruheim; G I Botchkina; E Gavin; Y Wan; A Formentini; M Kornmann; O Fodstad; J Ju
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.