Daniel E Payne1,2, Katrina L Dell2, Phillipa J Karoly1,3, Vaclav Kremen4,5, Vaclav Gerla5, Levin Kuhlmann2,6, Gregory A Worrell4, Mark J Cook2,3, David B Grayden1,2, Dean R Freestone2. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 2. Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 3. Graeme Clark Institute, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 4. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 5. Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics, and Cybernetics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. 6. Department of Data Science and AI, Faculty of IT, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Most seizure forecasting algorithms have relied on features specific to electroencephalographic recordings. Environmental and physiological factors, such as weather and sleep, have long been suspected to affect brain activity and seizure occurrence but have not been fully explored as prior information for seizure forecasts in a patient-specific analysis. The study aimed to quantify whether sleep, weather, and temporal factors (time of day, day of week, and lunar phase) can provide predictive prior probabilities that may be used to improve seizure forecasts. METHODS: This study performed post hoc analysis on data from eight patients with a total of 12.2 years of continuous intracranial electroencephalographic recordings (average = 1.5 years, range = 1.0-2.1 years), originally collected in a prospective trial. Patients also had sleep scoring and location-specific weather data. Histograms of future seizure likelihood were generated for each feature. The predictive utility of individual features was measured using a Bayesian approach to combine different features into an overall forecast of seizure likelihood. Performance of different feature combinations was compared using the area under the receiver operating curve. Performance evaluation was pseudoprospective. RESULTS: For the eight patients studied, seizures could be predicted above chance accuracy using sleep (five patients), weather (two patients), and temporal features (six patients). Forecasts using combined features performed significantly better than chance in six patients. For four of these patients, combined forecasts outperformed any individual feature. SIGNIFICANCE: Environmental and physiological data, including sleep, weather, and temporal features, provide significant predictive information on upcoming seizures. Although forecasts did not perform as well as algorithms that use invasive intracranial electroencephalography, the results were significantly above chance. Complementary signal features derived from an individual's historic seizure records may provide useful prior information to augment traditional seizure detection or forecasting algorithms. Importantly, many predictive features used in this study can be measured noninvasively.
OBJECTIVE: Most seizure forecasting algorithms have relied on features specific to electroencephalographic recordings. Environmental and physiological factors, such as weather and sleep, have long been suspected to affect brain activity and seizure occurrence but have not been fully explored as prior information for seizure forecasts in a patient-specific analysis. The study aimed to quantify whether sleep, weather, and temporal factors (time of day, day of week, and lunar phase) can provide predictive prior probabilities that may be used to improve seizure forecasts. METHODS: This study performed post hoc analysis on data from eight patients with a total of 12.2 years of continuous intracranial electroencephalographic recordings (average = 1.5 years, range = 1.0-2.1 years), originally collected in a prospective trial. Patients also had sleep scoring and location-specific weather data. Histograms of future seizure likelihood were generated for each feature. The predictive utility of individual features was measured using a Bayesian approach to combine different features into an overall forecast of seizure likelihood. Performance of different feature combinations was compared using the area under the receiver operating curve. Performance evaluation was pseudoprospective. RESULTS: For the eight patients studied, seizures could be predicted above chance accuracy using sleep (five patients), weather (two patients), and temporal features (six patients). Forecasts using combined features performed significantly better than chance in six patients. For four of these patients, combined forecasts outperformed any individual feature. SIGNIFICANCE: Environmental and physiological data, including sleep, weather, and temporal features, provide significant predictive information on upcoming seizures. Although forecasts did not perform as well as algorithms that use invasive intracranial electroencephalography, the results were significantly above chance. Complementary signal features derived from an individual's historic seizure records may provide useful prior information to augment traditional seizure detection or forecasting algorithms. Importantly, many predictive features used in this study can be measured noninvasively.
Authors: Mark J Cook; Terence J O'Brien; Samuel F Berkovic; Michael Murphy; Andrew Morokoff; Gavin Fabinyi; Wendyl D'Souza; Raju Yerra; John Archer; Lucas Litewka; Sean Hosking; Paul Lightfoot; Vanessa Ruedebusch; W Douglas Sheffield; David Snyder; Kent Leyde; David Himes Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Levin Kuhlmann; Philippa Karoly; Dean R Freestone; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Andriy Temko; Alexandre Barachant; Feng Li; Gilberto Titericz; Brian W Lang; Daniel Lavery; Kelly Roman; Derek Broadhead; Scott Dobson; Gareth Jones; Qingnan Tang; Irina Ivanenko; Oleg Panichev; Timothée Proix; Michal Náhlík; Daniel B Grunberg; Chip Reuben; Gregory Worrell; Brian Litt; David T J Liley; David B Grayden; Mark J Cook Journal: Brain Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Isabell Kiral-Kornek; Subhrajit Roy; Ewan Nurse; Benjamin Mashford; Philippa Karoly; Thomas Carroll; Daniel Payne; Susmita Saha; Steven Baldassano; Terence O'Brien; David Grayden; Mark Cook; Dean Freestone; Stefan Harrer Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 8.143
Authors: P Nejedly; V Kremen; V Sladky; J Cimbalnik; P Klimes; F Plesinger; I Viscor; M Pail; J Halamek; B H Brinkmann; M Brazdil; P Jurak; G Worrell Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-08-06 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Benjamin H Brinkmann; Philippa J Karoly; Ewan S Nurse; Sonya B Dumanis; Mona Nasseri; Pedro F Viana; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Dean R Freestone; Greg Worrell; Mark P Richardson; Mark J Cook Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Rachel E Stirling; David B Grayden; Wendyl D'Souza; Mark J Cook; Ewan Nurse; Dean R Freestone; Daniel E Payne; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Tal Pal Attia; Pedro F Viana; Mark P Richardson; Philippa J Karoly Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 4.003