| Literature DB >> 33376745 |
Shahana Wahid1, Ali Alqahtani2, Rafeeq Alam Khan1,3.
Abstract
Dementia and related conditions disturb the ability to perform routine life activities prohibiting a person from making appropriate decisions. Seeds of Cucumis melo and Citrullus lanatus have been investigated extensively for various pharmacological properties; hence, considering the presence of bioactive compounds, it was assumed that these seed extracts may support the functioning of the central nervous system. Thus, the present study was designed to investigate the short-term and long-term memory-enhancing effects of C. melo and C. lanatus seed extracts in mice by the Morris water maze (spatial learning and memory), stationary rod test, and passive avoidance tests (fear-motivated tests). Ethanol extract of both seeds were prepared by standard procedure and given to animals in the doses of 50 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg, and 200 mg/kg. The results were compared to standard drugs diazepam and imipramine given in the doses of 3 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg, respectively. Extracts of both the seeds were found to possess significant memory and cognition-enhancing effects in mice when tested by passive avoidance, stationary rod, and water maze tests. Results demonstrate memory and cognition-enhancing effects of these extracts which may be due to the presence of bioactive compounds in these seeds.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33376745 PMCID: PMC7746445 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8823038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Effects of C. melo and C. lanatus seed extracts on memory (passive avoidance).
| Groups & doses (mg/kg) | Latency time (sec) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 h | 24 h | 8th day | 21st day | |
| Control | 115 ± 34 | 99 ± 11.6 | 94 ± 15 | 55 ± 6.26 |
|
| 274 ± 26∗∗ | 300 ± .0.0∗∗ | 271 ± 29.1∗∗ | 261 ± 28∗∗ |
|
| 272 ± 28∗∗ | 258 ± 29∗∗ | 242 ± 29.7∗∗ | 246 ± 28∗∗ |
|
| 266 ± 28∗∗ | 289 ± 10.5∗∗ | 259 ± 27.3∗∗ | 111 ± 27 |
|
| 236 ± 32∗ | 281 ± 18.5∗∗ | 285 ± 15.2∗∗ | 104 ± 33 |
|
| 300 ± 0.0∗∗ | 300 ± 0.0∗∗ | 271 ± 29∗∗ | 222 ± 26∗∗ |
|
| 226 ± 36∗ | 260 ± 26.7∗∗ | 168.65 ± 36 | 237 ± 28.5∗∗ |
| Diazepam 3 | 155 ± 65 | 86 ± 13.5 | 16 ± 3.1∗ | 32 ± 14∗ |
| Imipramine 30 | 257 ± 43∗ | 245 ± 54.6∗ | 269 ± 31∗ | 209 ± 39∗ |
n = 10. Mean ± SEM. ∗P < 0.05 significant as compared to the control; ∗∗P < 0.01 highly significant as compared to the control.
Effects of C. melo and C. lanatus seed extracts on memory by stationary rod.
| Groups & doses (mg/kg) | Time to reach platform (sec) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning | 24 h | 8th day | 21st day | |
| Control | 12.04 ± 1.0 | 19.5 ± 1.1 | 25.9 ± 0.8 | 26.3 ± 1.1 |
|
| 11.9 ± 0.8 | 7.6 ± 0.9∗∗ | 5.3 ± 0.3∗∗ | 9.9 ± 1.3∗∗ |
|
| 14 ± 1.1 | 6.7 ± 0.4∗∗ | 8.0 ± 0.7∗∗ | 10.0 ± 1.0∗∗ |
|
| 18 ± 1.1 | 14.8 ± 1.5 | 12.5 ± 1 | 15.1 ± 1.2 |
|
| 16.5 ± 1.3 | 6.6 ± 0.5∗∗ | 7 ± 0.6∗∗ | 8.8 ± 1.4∗∗ |
|
| 12.7 ± 0.5 | 8.8 ± 0.9∗∗ | 8.3 ± 1∗∗ | 8.7 ± 1.1∗∗ |
|
| 14.5 ± 1.5 | 11.1 ± 0.7∗ | 11.6 ± 0.6∗∗ | 9 ± 1.0∗∗ |
| Diazepam 3 | 16.3 ± 0.6 | 28 ± 5 | 63.4 ± 8.5∗∗ | 82.9 ± 10.5∗∗ |
| Imipramine 30 | 13.9 ± 1.6 | 11.9 ± 1.8 | 8.2 ± 1.5∗∗ | 6.2 ± 0.9∗∗ |
n = 10. Mean ± SEM. ∗P < 0.05 significant as compared to the control; ∗∗P < 0.01 highly significant as compared to the control.
Effects of C. melo and C. lanatus seed extracts on memory by water maze test.
| Groups & doses (mg/kg) | Time to reach platform (sec) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning | 24 h | 8th day | 21st day | |
| Control | 14.4 ± 1.5 | 10.3 ± 0.7 | 19.0 ± 0.9 | 20.3 ± 0.7 |
|
| 15.5 ± 1.5 | 3.4 ± 0.5∗∗ | 3.9 ± 0.5∗∗ | 5.6 ± 0.6∗ |
|
| 13.9 ± 1.8 | 4.7 ± 0.7∗ | 3.3 ± 0.6∗∗ | 6.4 ± 1∗ |
|
| 16.3 ± 1.1 | 5.0 ± 0.9∗ | 6.4 ± 1.0∗∗ | 25.9 ± 3.9 |
|
| 9.6 ± 2 | 5.4 ± 1.04 | 4.6 ± 0.3∗∗ | 4.4 ± 0.7∗ |
|
| 7.8 ± 1.4 | 5.3 ± 0.5 | 2.6 ± 0.30∗∗ | 3.9 ± 0.6∗ |
|
| 8.0 ± 2 | 3.6 ± 0.3∗∗ | 3.5 ± 0.3∗∗ | 5.6 ± 0.7∗ |
| Diazepam 3 | 15.2 ± 0.8 | 33.8 ± 2.7∗∗ | 36.6 ± 2.9∗∗ | 91.7 ± 13.1∗∗ |
| Imipramine 30 | 13.9 ± 1.6 | 11.9 ± 1.8 | 8.2 ± 1.5∗∗ | 6.2 ± 0.9∗∗ |
n = 10. Mean ± SEM. ∗P < 0.05 significant as compared to the control; ∗∗P < 0.01 highly significant difference as compared to the control.