Tyler Etheridge1, Barbara Blodi1, Neal Oden2, Paul Van Veldhuisen2, Ingrid U Scott3, Michael S Ip4, Mihai Mititelu1, Amitha Domalpally5. 1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin. 2. The Emmes Company, LLC, Rockville, Maryland. 3. Departments of Ophthalmology and Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania. 4. Doheny Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California. 5. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: domalpally@wisc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between baseline demographic and spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) features with visual acuity (VA) in the Study of COmparative Treatments for REtinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2) over 2 years. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of prospective clinical trial data. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 362 SCORE2 participants with macular edema secondary to central retinal (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO). METHODS: Spectral domain OCT volume scans were assessed at the SCORE2 reading center at baseline, month 01 (M01), month 06 (M06), month 12 (M12), and month 24 (M24) for central subfield thickness (CST), subretinal fluid, intraretinal fluid, vitreoretinal interface abnormalities, disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL), and ellipsoid zone (EZ) within the central subfield (CSF). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity at M06, M12, and M24. RESULTS: Mean baseline age was 68.9 years. Mean VA at M01 was 63.2 letters, and CST was 299.7 μm. At M01, subretinal fluid was seen in 28.5% intraretinal fluid in 67.2%, DRIL was seen in 73.8%, mostly within the CSF, and the EZ was absent in 9.8 and patchy in 31.7%. In multivariate analysis including all M01 demographics and SD-OCT parameters and their association with VA at M06, M12, and M24, VA at M01 remained significant across all time points up to M24 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this 2-year follow-up of eyes that were treated with both per protocol and off protocol for RVO, VA at M01 was an important predictor of long-term vision and change in vision. Establishing predictors of visual recovery helps identify causes for poor responders to treatment in patients with RVO.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between baseline demographic and spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) features with visual acuity (VA) in the Study of COmparative Treatments for REtinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2) over 2 years. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of prospective clinical trial data. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 362 SCORE2 participants with macular edema secondary to central retinal (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO). METHODS: Spectral domain OCT volume scans were assessed at the SCORE2 reading center at baseline, month 01 (M01), month 06 (M06), month 12 (M12), and month 24 (M24) for central subfield thickness (CST), subretinal fluid, intraretinal fluid, vitreoretinal interface abnormalities, disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL), and ellipsoid zone (EZ) within the central subfield (CSF). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity at M06, M12, and M24. RESULTS: Mean baseline age was 68.9 years. Mean VA at M01 was 63.2 letters, and CST was 299.7 μm. At M01, subretinal fluid was seen in 28.5% intraretinal fluid in 67.2%, DRIL was seen in 73.8%, mostly within the CSF, and the EZ was absent in 9.8 and patchy in 31.7%. In multivariate analysis including all M01 demographics and SD-OCT parameters and their association with VA at M06, M12, and M24, VA at M01 remained significant across all time points up to M24 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this 2-year follow-up of eyes that were treated with both per protocol and off protocol for RVO, VA at M01 was an important predictor of long-term vision and change in vision. Establishing predictors of visual recovery helps identify causes for poor responders to treatment in patients with RVO.
Authors: Sophie L Rogers; Rachel L McIntosh; Lyndell Lim; Paul Mitchell; Ning Cheung; Jonathan W Kowalski; Hiep P Nguyen; Jie Jin Wang; Tien Yin Wong Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: David M Brown; Peter A Campochiaro; Rishi P Singh; Zhengrong Li; Sarah Gray; Namrata Saroj; Amy Chen Rundle; Roman G Rubio; Wendy Yee Murahashi Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2010-04-09 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ingrid U Scott; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Michael S Ip; Barbara A Blodi; Neal L Oden; Jacqueline King; Andrew N Antoszyk; Mark A Peters; Michael Tolentino Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Ingrid U Scott; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Michael S Ip; Barbara A Blodi; Neal L Oden; Maria Figueroa; Pravin U Dugel Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Amy S Babiuch; Michael Han; Felipe F Conti; Karen Wai; Fabiana Q Silva; Rishi P Singh Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Ingrid U Scott; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Neal L Oden; Michael S Ip; Barbara A Blodi; J Michael Jumper; Maria Figueroa Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2009-01-22 Impact factor: 12.079