Literature DB >> 20381871

Ranibizumab for macular edema following central retinal vein occlusion: six-month primary end point results of a phase III study.

David M Brown1, Peter A Campochiaro, Rishi P Singh, Zhengrong Li, Sarah Gray, Namrata Saroj, Amy Chen Rundle, Roman G Rubio, Wendy Yee Murahashi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab in patients with macular edema after central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, sham injection-controlled, double-masked, multicenter clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 392 patients with macular edema after CRVO.
METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive monthly intraocular injections of 0.3 or 0.5 mg of ranibizumab or sham injections. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy outcome measure was mean change from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score at month 6. Secondary outcomes included other parameters of visual function and central foveal thickness (CFT).
RESULTS: Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 6 was 12.7 (9.9-15.4) and 14.9 (12.6-17.2) in the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg ranibizumab groups, respectively, and 0.8 (-2.0 to 3.6) in the sham group (P<0.0001 for each ranibizumab group vs. sham). The percentage of patients who gained > or =15 letters in BCVA at month 6 was 46.2% (0.3 mg) and 47.7% (0.5 mg) in the ranibizumab groups and 16.9% in the sham group (P<0.0001 for each ranibizumab group vs. sham). At month 6, significantly more ranibizumab-treated patients (0.3 mg = 43.9%; 0.5 mg = 46.9%) had BCVA of > or = 20/40 compared with sham patients (20.8%; P<0.0001 for each ranibizumab group vs. sham), and CFT had decreased by a mean of 434 microm (0.3 mg) and 452 microm (0.5 mg) in the ranibizumab groups and 168 microm in the sham group (P<0.0001 for each ranibizumab group vs. sham). The median percent reduction in excess foveal thickness at month 6 was 94.0% and 97.3% in the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg groups, respectively, and 23.9% in the sham group. The safety profile was consistent with previous phase III ranibizumab trials, and no new safety events were identified in patients with CRVO.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab provided rapid improvement in 6-month visual acuity and macular edema following CRVO, with low rates of ocular and nonocular safety events. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20381871     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  256 in total

Review 1.  Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Tasanee Braithwaite; Afshan A Nanji; Paul B Greenberg
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

Review 2.  Emerging therapeutic approaches in the management of retinal angiogenesis and edema.

Authors:  An Truong; Tien Y Wong; Levon M Khachigian
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Vascular endothelial growth factor and age-related macular degeneration: from basic science to therapy.

Authors:  Napoleone Ferrara
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Intravitreal aflibercept for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion in patients with prior treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab.

Authors:  T D Papakostas; L Lim; T van Zyl; J B Miller; B S Modjtahedi; C M Andreoli; D Wu; L H Young; I K Kim; D G Vavvas; D D Esmaili; D Husain; D Eliott; L A Kim
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Reply to 'Comment on: Intravitreal aflibercept for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion in patients with prior treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizmab'.

Authors:  T D Papakostas; D Vavvas; D Eliott; L A Kim
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 6.  [Intravitreal implants: drug carriers and carriers of hope?].

Authors:  S Winterhalter; P Ruokonen; K H van der Velden; U Pleyer; A M Joussen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Outcomes of switching treatment to aflibercept in patients with macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion refractory to ranibizumab.

Authors:  Vasileios Konidaris; Zahra Al-Hubeshy; Konstantinos T Tsaousis; Konstantina Gorgoli; Somnath Banerjee; Theodoros Empeslidis
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Predictive factors for functional improvement following intravitreal bevacizumab injections after central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Kai Januschowski; Nicolas Feltgen; Amelie Pielen; Bernhard Spitzer; Matus Rehak; Georg Spital; Spyridon Dimopoulos; Carsten H Meyer; Gesine B Szurman
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Comparison between ranibizumab and aflibercept for macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Yoshitsugu Saishin; Yuka Ito; Masato Fujikawa; Tomoko Sawada; Masahito Ohji
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Potential anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies for central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Marta S Figueroa; Inés Contreras
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.