Jakob Siedlecki1, Lars-Olof Hattenbach2, Nikolas Feltgen3, Siegfried G Priglinger4. 1. Augenklinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland. jakob.siedlecki@med.uni-muenchen.de. 2. Augenklinik, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen gGmbH, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland. 3. Augenklinik, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Universitätsmedizin, Göttingen, Deutschland. 4. Augenklinik, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Retinal vein occlusion, subdivided into central retinal and branch retinal vein occlusion, is one of the most frequent vascular diseases of the retina. Biomarkers of optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT-angiography and (ultra-widefield) fluorescein angiography are of exceptional importance in the initial diagnosis and also in the treatment of complications associated with retinal vascular occlusion, particularly macular edema. METHODS: A systematic literature review was carried out in PubMed with the keywords central retinal vein occlusion, branch retinal vein occlusion, biomarker, OCT, OCT angiography, ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography with prioritization of the most important aspects. RESULTS: Relevant biomarkers in OCT include central retinal thickness (CRT), macular fluid, the integrity of the photoreceptor bands (external limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone), disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL), hyperreflective foci, choroidal thickness and signs of ischemia, such as a prominent middle limiting membrane (p-MLM), paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM) as well as hyperreflectivity of inner retinal layers (HIRL). The importance of OCT-angiography lies particularly in the assessment of microvascular alterations, especially vessel density in the deep retinal vascular plexus, the foveal avascular zone and of areas with no capillary perfusion. Biomarkers of ultra-widefield angiography, such as peripheral ischemia (ischemic index) and neovascularízation are essential with respect to treatment decisions for retinal laser. CONCLUSION: A multitude of simple and complex biomarkers currently enable an effective individualized evaluation of treatment and prognosis in retinal vein occlusion. A shift from invasive to noninvasive biomarkers can be observed.
BACKGROUND: Retinal vein occlusion, subdivided into central retinal and branch retinal vein occlusion, is one of the most frequent vascular diseases of the retina. Biomarkers of optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT-angiography and (ultra-widefield) fluorescein angiography are of exceptional importance in the initial diagnosis and also in the treatment of complications associated with retinal vascular occlusion, particularly macular edema. METHODS: A systematic literature review was carried out in PubMed with the keywords central retinal vein occlusion, branch retinal vein occlusion, biomarker, OCT, OCT angiography, ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography with prioritization of the most important aspects. RESULTS: Relevant biomarkers in OCT include central retinal thickness (CRT), macular fluid, the integrity of the photoreceptor bands (external limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone), disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL), hyperreflective foci, choroidal thickness and signs of ischemia, such as a prominent middle limiting membrane (p-MLM), paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM) as well as hyperreflectivity of inner retinal layers (HIRL). The importance of OCT-angiography lies particularly in the assessment of microvascular alterations, especially vessel density in the deep retinal vascular plexus, the foveal avascular zone and of areas with no capillary perfusion. Biomarkers of ultra-widefield angiography, such as peripheral ischemia (ischemic index) and neovascularízation are essential with respect to treatment decisions for retinal laser. CONCLUSION: A multitude of simple and complex biomarkers currently enable an effective individualized evaluation of treatment and prognosis in retinal vein occlusion. A shift from invasive to noninvasive biomarkers can be observed.
Authors: Sophie Rogers; Rachel L McIntosh; Ning Cheung; Lyndell Lim; Jie Jin Wang; Paul Mitchell; Jonathan W Kowalski; Hiep Nguyen; Tien Y Wong Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Thomas Ach; Alexandra E Hoeh; Karen B Schaal; Alexander F Scheuerle; Stefan Dithmar Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2009-09-09 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Mathieu F Bakhoum; K Bailey Freund; Rosa Dolz-Marco; Belinda C S Leong; Caroline R Baumal; Jay S Duker; David Sarraf Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Ingrid U Scott; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Neal L Oden; Michael S Ip; Barbara A Blodi; J Michael Jumper; Maria Figueroa Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2009-01-22 Impact factor: 12.079