Literature DB >> 33365228

Testing ecosystem accounting in the United States: A case study for the Southeast.

Katherine J D Warnell1, Marc Russell2, Charles Rhodes3, Kenneth J Bagstad4, Lydia P Olander1, David J Nowak5, Rajendra Poudel6, Pierre D Glynn7, Julie L Hass8, Satoshi Hirabayashi9, Jane Carter Ingram10, John Matuszak11, Kirsten L L Oleson12, Stephen M Posner13, Ferdinando Villa14.   

Abstract

Ecosystem accounts, as formalized by the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting Experimental Ecosystem Accounts (SEEA EEA), have been compiled in a number of countries, yet there have been few attempts to develop them for the U.S. We explore the potential for U.S. ecosystem accounting by compiling ecosystem extent, condition, and ecosystem services supply and use accounts for a ten-state region in the Southeast. The pilot accounts address air quality, water quality, biodiversity, carbon storage, recreation, and pollination for selected years from 2001 to 2015. Results illustrate how information from ecosystem accounts can contribute to policy and decision-making. Using an example from Atlanta, we also show how ecosystem accounts can be considered alongside other SEEA accounts to give a more complete picture of a local area's environmental-economic trends. The process by which we determined where to place metrics within the accounting framework, which was strongly informed by the National Ecosystem Services Classification System (NESCS), can provide guidance for future ecosystem accounts in the U.S. and other countries. Finally, we identify knowledge gaps that limit the inclusion of certain ecosystem services in the accounts and suggest future research that can close these gaps and improve future U.S. ecosystem accounts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Experimental Ecosystem Accounting; National Ecosystem Services Classification System; System of Environmental-Economic Accounts; air quality regulation; pollination; recreational birding

Year:  2020        PMID: 33365228      PMCID: PMC7751700          DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecosyst Serv        ISSN: 2212-0416            Impact factor:   5.454


  10 in total

1.  Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice.

Authors:  Anne D Guerry; Stephen Polasky; Jane Lubchenco; Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer; Gretchen C Daily; Robert Griffin; Mary Ruckelshaus; Ian J Bateman; Anantha Duraiappah; Thomas Elmqvist; Marcus W Feldman; Carl Folke; Jon Hoekstra; Peter M Kareiva; Bonnie L Keeler; Shuzhuo Li; Emily McKenzie; Zhiyun Ouyang; Belinda Reyers; Taylor H Ricketts; Johan Rockström; Heather Tallis; Bhaskar Vira
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Urban expansion simulation and the spatio-temporal changes of ecosystem services, a case study in Atlanta Metropolitan area, USA.

Authors:  Xiao Sun; John C Crittenden; Feng Li; Zhongming Lu; Xiaolin Dou
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 3.  Natural capital accounting for better policy.

Authors:  Arjan Ruijs; Michael Vardon; Steve Bass; Sofia Ahlroth
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Tree and forest effects on air quality and human health in the United States.

Authors:  David J Nowak; Satoshi Hirabayashi; Allison Bodine; Eric Greenfield
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Ecosystem accounts define explicit and spatial trade-offs for managing natural resources.

Authors:  Heather Keith; Michael Vardon; John A Stein; Janet L Stein; David Lindenmayer
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 15.460

6.  Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance.

Authors:  Lucas A Garibaldi; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Rachael Winfree; Marcelo A Aizen; Riccardo Bommarco; Saul A Cunningham; Claire Kremen; Luísa G Carvalheiro; Lawrence D Harder; Ohad Afik; Ignasi Bartomeus; Faye Benjamin; Virginie Boreux; Daniel Cariveau; Natacha P Chacoff; Jan H Dudenhöffer; Breno M Freitas; Jaboury Ghazoul; Sarah Greenleaf; Juliana Hipólito; Andrea Holzschuh; Brad Howlett; Rufus Isaacs; Steven K Javorek; Christina M Kennedy; Kristin M Krewenka; Smitha Krishnan; Yael Mandelik; Margaret M Mayfield; Iris Motzke; Theodore Munyuli; Brian A Nault; Mark Otieno; Jessica Petersen; Gideon Pisanty; Simon G Potts; Romina Rader; Taylor H Ricketts; Maj Rundlöf; Colleen L Seymour; Christof Schüepp; Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi; Hisatomo Taki; Teja Tscharntke; Carlos H Vergara; Blandina F Viana; Thomas C Wanger; Catrin Westphal; Neal Williams; Alexandra M Klein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment.

Authors:  Ferdinando Villa; Kenneth J Bagstad; Brian Voigt; Gary W Johnson; Rosimeiry Portela; Miroslav Honzák; David Batker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Carbon storage in US wetlands.

Authors:  A M Nahlik; M S Fennessy
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Defining Ecosystem Assets for Natural Capital Accounting.

Authors:  Lars Hein; Ken Bagstad; Bram Edens; Carl Obst; Rixt de Jong; Jan Peter Lesschen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Value of Coastal Wetlands for Flood Damage Reduction in the Northeastern USA.

Authors:  Siddharth Narayan; Michael W Beck; Paul Wilson; Christopher J Thomas; Alexandra Guerrero; Christine C Shepard; Borja G Reguero; Guillermo Franco; Jane Carter Ingram; Dania Trespalacios
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Synthesis of Two Decades of US EPA's Ecosystem Services Research to Inform Environmental, Community, and Sustainability Decision Making.

Authors:  Matthew C Harwell; Chloe A Jackson
Journal:  Sustainability       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 3.889

2.  An Indigenous perspective on ecosystem accounting: Challenges and opportunities revealed by an Australian case study.

Authors:  Anna Normyle; Bruce Doran; Michael Vardon; Dean Mathews; Julie Melbourne; Glenn Althor
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 6.943

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.