Literature DB >> 28963477

Ecosystem accounts define explicit and spatial trade-offs for managing natural resources.

Heather Keith1, Michael Vardon2, John A Stein2, Janet L Stein2, David Lindenmayer2.   

Abstract

Decisions about natural resource management are frequently complex and vexed, often leading to public policy compromises. Discord between environmental and economic metrics creates problems in assessing trade-offs between different current or potential resource uses. Ecosystem accounts, which quantify ecosystems and their benefits for human well-being consistent with national economic accounts, provide exciting opportunities to contribute significantly to the policy process. We advanced the application of ecosystem accounts in a regional case study by explicitly and spatially linking impacts of human and natural activities on ecosystem assets and services to their associated industries. This demonstrated contributions of ecosystems beyond the traditional national accounts. Our results revealed that native forests would provide greater benefits from their ecosystem services of carbon sequestration, water yield, habitat provisioning and recreational amenity if harvesting for timber production ceased, thus allowing forests to continue growing to older ages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28963477     DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0309-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2397-334X            Impact factor:   15.460


  9 in total

1.  Testing ecosystem accounting in the United States: A case study for the Southeast.

Authors:  Katherine J D Warnell; Marc Russell; Charles Rhodes; Kenneth J Bagstad; Lydia P Olander; David J Nowak; Rajendra Poudel; Pierre D Glynn; Julie L Hass; Satoshi Hirabayashi; Jane Carter Ingram; John Matuszak; Kirsten L L Oleson; Stephen M Posner; Ferdinando Villa
Journal:  Ecosyst Serv       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.454

2.  Putting biodiversity into the national accounts: Creating a new paradigm for economic decisions.

Authors:  Michael Vardon; Heather Keith; Carl Obst; David Lindenmayer
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 3.  Natural capital accounting for better policy.

Authors:  Arjan Ruijs; Michael Vardon; Steve Bass; Sofia Ahlroth
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Hidden collapse is driven by fire and logging in a socioecological forest ecosystem.

Authors:  David B Lindenmayer; Chloe Sato
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  At the human-forest interface.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Developing accurate prediction systems for the terrestrial environment.

Authors:  David B Lindenmayer
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 7.431

7.  From COVID-19 to Green Recovery with natural capital accounting.

Authors:  Michael Vardon; Paul Lucas; Steve Bass; Matthew Agarwala; Andrea M Bassi; Diane Coyle; Anthony Dvarskas; Catherine A Farrell; Oliver Greenfield; Steven King; Martin Lok; Carl Obst; Brian O'Callaghan; Rosimeiry Portela; Juha Siikamäki
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 6.943

8.  Empirical relationships between tree fall and landscape-level amounts of logging and fire.

Authors:  David B Lindenmayer; Wade Blanchard; David Blair; Lachlan McBurney; John Stein; Sam C Banks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Our use, misuse, and abandonment of a concept: Whither habitat?

Authors:  David Anthony Kirk; Allysia C Park; Adam C Smith; Briar J Howes; Brigid K Prouse; Naschelly G Kyssa; Elizabeth N Fairhurst; Kent A Prior
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.