| Literature DB >> 26082539 |
Anne D Guerry1, Stephen Polasky2, Jane Lubchenco3, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer4, Gretchen C Daily5, Robert Griffin6, Mary Ruckelshaus7, Ian J Bateman8, Anantha Duraiappah9, Thomas Elmqvist10, Marcus W Feldman11, Carl Folke12, Jon Hoekstra13, Peter M Kareiva14, Bonnie L Keeler15, Shuzhuo Li16, Emily McKenzie17, Zhiyun Ouyang18, Belinda Reyers19, Taylor H Ricketts20, Johan Rockström10, Heather Tallis21, Bhaskar Vira22.
Abstract
The central challenge of the 21st century is to develop economic, social, and governance systems capable of ending poverty and achieving sustainable levels of population and consumption while securing the life-support systems underpinning current and future human well-being. Essential to meeting this challenge is the incorporation of natural capital and the ecosystem services it provides into decision-making. We explore progress and crucial gaps at this frontier, reflecting upon the 10 y since the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. We focus on three key dimensions of progress and ongoing challenges: raising awareness of the interdependence of ecosystems and human well-being, advancing the fundamental interdisciplinary science of ecosystem services, and implementing this science in decisions to restore natural capital and use it sustainably. Awareness of human dependence on nature is at an all-time high, the science of ecosystem services is rapidly advancing, and talk of natural capital is now common from governments to corporate boardrooms. However, successful implementation is still in early stages. We explore why ecosystem service information has yet to fundamentally change decision-making and suggest a path forward that emphasizes: (i) developing solid evidence linking decisions to impacts on natural capital and ecosystem services, and then to human well-being; (ii) working closely with leaders in government, business, and civil society to develop the knowledge, tools, and practices necessary to integrate natural capital and ecosystem services into everyday decision-making; and (iii) reforming institutions to change policy and practices to better align private short-term goals with societal long-term goals.Entities:
Keywords: beneficiary; decision making; human well-being; resilience; sustainable development
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26082539 PMCID: PMC4475956 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1503751112
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205