Literature DB >> 33362638

Constraints and Affordances of Online Engagement With Scientific Information-A Literature Review.

Friederike Hendriks1, Elisabeth Mayweg-Paus2, Mark Felton3, Kalypso Iordanou4, Regina Jucks1, Maria Zimmermann2.   

Abstract

Many urgent problems that societies currently face-from climate change to a global pandemic-require citizens to engage with scientific information as members of democratic societies as well as to solve problems in their personal lives. Most often, to solve their epistemic aims (aims directed at achieving knowledge and understanding) regarding such socio-scientific issues, individuals search for information online, where there exists a multitude of possibly relevant and highly interconnected sources of different perspectives, sometimes providing conflicting information. The paper provides a review of the literature aimed at identifying (a) constraints and affordances that scientific knowledge and the online information environment entail and (b) individuals' cognitive and motivational processes that have been found to hinder, or conversely, support practices of engagement (such as critical information evaluation or two-sided dialogue). Doing this, a conceptual framework for understanding and fostering what we call online engagement with scientific information is introduced, which is conceived as consisting of individual engagement (engaging on one's own in the search, selection, evaluation, and integration of information) and dialogic engagement (engaging in discourse with others to interpret, articulate and critically examine scientific information). In turn, this paper identifies individual and contextual conditions for individuals' goal-directed and effortful online engagement with scientific information.
Copyright © 2020 Hendriks, Mayweg-Paus, Felton, Iordanou, Jucks and Zimmermann.

Entities:  

Keywords:  argumentation; digital literacy; epistemic cognition; multiple documents literacy; online engagement with scientific information; scientific literacy

Year:  2020        PMID: 33362638      PMCID: PMC7759725          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  37 in total

1.  Readers' use of source information in text comprehension.

Authors:  Jason L G Braasch; Jean-François Rouet; Nicolas Vibert; M Anne Britt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

2.  Surprised-curious-confused: Epistemic emotions and knowledge exploration.

Authors:  Elisabeth Vogl; Reinhard Pekrun; Kou Murayama; Kristina Loderer
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-03-18

3.  How Moral Threat Shapes Laypersons' Engagement With Science.

Authors:  Jens Bender; Tobias Rothmund; Peter Nauroth; Mario Gollwitzer
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-12

4.  Active-constructive-interactive: a conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities.

Authors:  Michelene T H Chi
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-01

5.  Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors.

Authors:  R J Griffin; S Dunwoody; K Neuwirth
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.498

6.  Believing in Expertise: How Authors' Credentials and Language Use Influence the Credibility of Online Health Information.

Authors:  Franziska M Thon; Regina Jucks
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2016-07-28

7.  Measuring Laypeople's Trust in Experts in a Digital Age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI).

Authors:  Friederike Hendriks; Dorothe Kienhues; Rainer Bromme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Hot topics in science communication: Aggressive language decreases trustworthiness and credibility in scientific debates.

Authors:  Lars König; Regina Jucks
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2019-03-07

9.  Missing Links in Middle School: Developing Use of Disciplinary Relatedness in Evaluating Internet Search Results.

Authors:  Frank C Keil; Jonathan F Kominsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Individual Uncertainty and the Uncertainty of Science: The Impact of Perceived Conflict and General Self-Efficacy on the Perception of Tentativeness and Credibility of Scientific Information.

Authors:  Danny Flemming; Insa Feinkohl; Ulrike Cress; Joachim Kimmerle
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Data practices during COVID: Everyday sensemaking in a high-stakes information ecology.

Authors:  Josh Radinsky; Iris Tabak
Journal:  Br J Educ Technol       Date:  2022-06-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.