Literature DB >> 25164801

Active-constructive-interactive: a conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities.

Michelene T H Chi1.   

Abstract

Active, constructive, and interactive are terms that are commonly used in the cognitive and learning sciences. They describe activities that can be undertaken by learners. However, the literature is actually not explicit about how these terms can be defined; whether they are distinct; and whether they refer to overt manifestations, learning processes, or learning outcomes. Thus, a framework is provided here that offers a way to differentiate active, constructive, and interactive in terms of observable overt activities and underlying learning processes. The framework generates a testable hypothesis for learning: that interactive activities are most likely to be better than constructive activities, which in turn might be better than active activities, which are better than being passive. Studies from the literature are cited to provide evidence in support of this hypothesis. Moreover, postulating underlying learning processes allows us to interpret evidence in the literature more accurately. Specifying distinct overt activities for active, constructive, and interactive also offers suggestions for how learning activities can be coded and how each kind of activity might be elicited.
Copyright © 2009 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Keywords:  Active; Constructive; Interactive; Learning activities

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 25164801     DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1756-8757


  56 in total

1.  Using online lectures to make time for active learning.

Authors:  Amy J Prunuske; Janet Batzli; Evelyn Howell; Sarah Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Generating explanations via analogical comparison.

Authors:  Christian Hoyos; Dedre Gentner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10

3.  Student Perceptions of Learning Through an International Comparison.

Authors:  Phillip Woods; Jason Perepelkin; Amary Mey; Rodney Gapp; Michelle King
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-12-25       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  "Alien Health": A Nutrition Instruction Exergame Using the Kinect Sensor.

Authors:  Mina C Johnson-Glenberg; Caroline Savio-Ramos; Hue Henry
Journal:  Games Health J       Date:  2014-08-01

5.  Scientific Discovery Games for Biomedical Research.

Authors:  Rhiju Das; Benjamin Keep; Peter Washington; Ingmar H Riedel-Kruse
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci       Date:  2019-07

6.  Metacognitive study strategies in a college course and their relation to exam performance.

Authors:  Cristina D Zepeda; Timothy J Nokes-Malach
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-11-04

7.  Active engagement in a web-based tutorial to prevent obesity grounded in Fuzzy-Trace Theory predicts higher knowledge and gist comprehension.

Authors:  Priscila G Brust-Renck; Valerie F Reyna; Evan A Wilhelms; Christopher R Wolfe; Colin L Widmer; Elizabeth M Cedillos-Whynott; A Kate Morant
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-08

8.  Predicting Second and Third Graders' Reading Comprehension Gains: Observing Students' and Classmates Talk during Literacy Instruction using COLT.

Authors:  Carol McDonald Connor; Benjamin Kelcey; Nicole Sparapani; Yaacov Petscher; Sarah W Siegal; Ashley Adams; Jin Kyoung Hwang; Joanne F Carlisle
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2019-12-18

9.  Scaffolding of small groups' metacognitive activities with an avatar.

Authors:  Inge Molenaar; Ming Ming Chiu; Peter Sleegers; Carla van Boxtel
Journal:  Int J Comput Support Collab Learn       Date:  2011-10-12

10.  Brain Training for Kids: Adding a Human Touch.

Authors:  Brenna Hassinger-Das; Kathy Hirsh-Pasek
Journal:  Cerebrum       Date:  2019-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.