Literature DB >> 27466693

Believing in Expertise: How Authors' Credentials and Language Use Influence the Credibility of Online Health Information.

Franziska M Thon1, Regina Jucks1.   

Abstract

Today, many people use the Internet to seek health advice. This study examines how an author's expertise is established and how this affects the credibility of his or her online health information. In a 2 (authors' credentials: medical vs. nonmedical) × 2 (authors' language use: technical vs. every day) within-subjects design, 127 study participants, or "seekers," judged authors' expertise, benevolence, and integrity as well as the credibility of their medical statements. In addition, we assessed seekers' awareness of their own knowledge and behavior. Results revealed that users consciously rewarded authors' credentials and subconsciously punished technical language. Seekers were keenly aware of authors' credentials and perceived authors with medical credentials to have a higher level of expertise and their information to be more credible. Technical language use negatively affected authors' integrity and the credibility of their health information, despite seekers being unaware of it. Practical implications for health communication and implications for future research are outlined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27466693     DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1172296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Commun        ISSN: 1041-0236


  10 in total

1.  How Experts' Use of Medical Technical Jargon in Different Types of Online Health Forums Affects Perceived Information Credibility: Randomized Experiment With Laypersons.

Authors:  Maria Zimmermann; Regina Jucks
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Attacking science on social media: How user comments affect perceived trustworthiness and credibility.

Authors:  Lukas Gierth; Rainer Bromme
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2019-12-05

3.  Hot topics in science communication: Aggressive language decreases trustworthiness and credibility in scientific debates.

Authors:  Lars König; Regina Jucks
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2019-03-07

4.  Influence of Enthusiastic Language on the Credibility of Health Information and the Trustworthiness of Science Communicators: Insights From a Between-Subject Web-Based Experiment.

Authors:  Lars König; Regina Jucks
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2019-08-12

Review 5.  Constraints and Affordances of Online Engagement With Scientific Information-A Literature Review.

Authors:  Friederike Hendriks; Elisabeth Mayweg-Paus; Mark Felton; Kalypso Iordanou; Regina Jucks; Maria Zimmermann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-12-08

6.  Internet-Based Information Behavior After Pregnancy Loss: Interview Study.

Authors:  Nazanin Andalibi; Kristen Bowen
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-03-02

7.  Patient-Reported Quality of Communication Skills in the Clinical Workplace for Clinicians Learning Medical Spanish.

Authors:  Pilar Ortega; Santiago Avila; Yoon Soo Park
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-15

Review 8.  Consumers' Evaluation of Web-Based Health Information Quality: Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Yeolib Kim
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 7.076

Review 9.  Language Use in Conversational Agent-Based Health Communication: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yi Shan; Meng Ji; Wenxiu Xie; Xiaobo Qian; Rongying Li; Xiaomin Zhang; Tianyong Hao
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 7.076

10.  Beware of vested interests: Epistemic vigilance improves reasoning about scientific evidence (for some people).

Authors:  Lukas Gierth; Rainer Bromme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.