Literature DB >> 33362622

A Comparison of Human and Computational Melody Prediction Through Familiarity and Expertise.

Matevž Pesek1, Špela Medvešek1, Anja Podlesek2, Marko Tkalčič3, Matija Marolt1.   

Abstract

Melody prediction is an important aspect of music listening. The success of prediction, i.e., whether the next note played in a song is the same as the one predicted by the listener, depends on various factors. In the paper, we present two studies, where we assess how music familiarity and music expertise influence melody prediction in human listeners, and, expressed in appropriate data/algorithmic ways, computational models. To gather data on human listeners, we designed a melody prediction user study, where familiarity was controlled by two different music collections, while expertise was assessed by adapting the Music Sophistication Index instrument to Slovenian language. In the second study, we evaluated the melody prediction accuracy of computational melody prediction models. We evaluated two models, the SymCHM and the Implication-Realization model, which differ substantially in how they approach melody prediction. Our results show that both music familiarity and expertise affect the prediction accuracy of human listeners, as well as of computational models.
Copyright © 2020 Pesek, Medvešek, Podlesek, Tkalčič and Marolt.

Entities:  

Keywords:  compositional hierarchical model; implication-realization model; melody prediction; music information retrieval; music perception; music similarity

Year:  2020        PMID: 33362622      PMCID: PMC7756065          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.557398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  23 in total

Review 1.  Music, cognition, culture, and evolution.

Authors:  I Cross
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Musical syntax is processed in Broca's area: an MEG study.

Authors:  B Maess; S Koelsch; T C Gunter; A D Friederici
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  FMRI investigation of cross-cultural music comprehension.

Authors:  Steven J Morrison; Steven M Demorest; Elizabeth H Aylward; Steven C Cramer; Kenneth R Maravilla
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline.

Authors:  Valmi D Sousa; Wilaiporn Rojjanasrirat
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Universal recognition of three basic emotions in music.

Authors:  Thomas Fritz; Sebastian Jentschke; Nathalie Gosselin; Daniela Sammler; Isabelle Peretz; Robert Turner; Angela D Friederici; Stefan Koelsch
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 6.  A combined model of sensory and cognitive representations underlying tonal expectations in music: from audio signals to behavior.

Authors:  Tom Collins; Barbara Tillmann; Frederick S Barrett; Charles Delbé; Petr Janata
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Universality and diversity in human song.

Authors:  Samuel A Mehr; Manvir Singh; Dean Knox; Daniel M Ketter; Daniel Pickens-Jones; S Atwood; Christopher Lucas; Nori Jacoby; Alena A Egner; Erin J Hopkins; Rhea M Howard; Joshua K Hartshorne; Mariela V Jennings; Jan Simson; Constance M Bainbridge; Steven Pinker; Timothy J O'Donnell; Max M Krasnow; Luke Glowacki
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Neural mechanisms underlying melodic perception and memory for pitch.

Authors:  R J Zatorre; A C Evans; E Meyer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Robust Real-Time Music Transcription with a Compositional Hierarchical Model.

Authors:  Matevž Pesek; Aleš Leonardis; Matija Marolt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The musicality of non-musicians: an index for assessing musical sophistication in the general population.

Authors:  Daniel Müllensiefen; Bruno Gingras; Jason Musil; Lauren Stewart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.