Literature DB >> 33362621

Applying Q-Methodology to Investigate People' Preferences for Multivariate Stimuli.

Jie Gao1, Alessandro Soranzo2.   

Abstract

This article serves as a step-by-step guide of a new application of Q-methodology to investigate people's preferences for multivariate stimuli. Q-methodology has been widely applied in fields such as sociology, education and political sciences but, despite its numerous advantages, it has not yet gained much attention from experimental psychologists. This may be due to the fact that psychologists examining preferences, often adopt stimuli resulting from a combination of characteristics from multiple variables, and in repeated measure designs. At present, Q methodology has not been adapted to accommodate. We therefore developed a novel analysis procedure allowing Q-methodology to handle these conditions. We propose a protocol requiring five analyses of a decision process to estimate: (1) the preference of stimuli, (2) the dominance of variables, (3) the individual differences, (4) the interaction between individual differences and preference, and (5) the interaction between individual differences and dominance. The guide comes with a script developed in R (R Core Team, 2020) to run the five analyses; furthermore, we provide a case study with a detailed description of the procedure and corresponding results. This guide is particularly beneficial to conduct and analyze experiments in any research on people's preferences, such as experimental aesthetics, prototype testing, visual perception (e.g., judgments of similarity/dissimilarity to a model), etc.
Copyright © 2020 Gao and Soranzo.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Q-methodology; dominance – rank orders; individual differences; preference; repeated measures analyses

Year:  2020        PMID: 33362621      PMCID: PMC7758491          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.556509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  9 in total

1.  A RATIONALE AND TEST FOR THE NUMBER OF FACTORS IN FACTOR ANALYSIS.

Authors:  J L HORN
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.

Authors:  R B Cattell
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1966-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Mindful judgment and decision making.

Authors:  Elke U Weber; Eric J Johnson
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  A psychometric approach to the measurement of color preference.

Authors:  E P Gelineau
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1981-08

5.  The aesthetics of simple figures.

Authors:  I C McManus
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1980-11

6.  Do observers like curvature or do they dislike angularity?

Authors:  Marco Bertamini; Letizia Palumbo; Tamara Nicoleta Gheorghes; Mai Galatsidas
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2015-04-13

7.  On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects.

Authors:  Alessandro Soranzo; Daniela Petrelli; Luigina Ciolfi; John Reidy
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Taxonomy of Individual Variations in Aesthetic Responses to Fractal Patterns.

Authors:  Branka Spehar; Nicholas Walker; Richard P Taylor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Bootstrapping Q Methodology to Improve the Understanding of Human Perspectives.

Authors:  Aiora Zabala; Unai Pascual
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.